Compliance and cooperation in global value chains: The effects of the better cotton initiative in Pakistan and India

被引:2
|
作者
Ghori, Shakil
Lund-Thomsen, Peter [1 ]
Gallemore, Caleb [2 ]
Singh, Sukhpal [3 ]
Riisgaard, Lone [4 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Business Sch, Ctr Business & Dev Studies, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Lafayette Coll, Easton, PA 18042 USA
[3] Indian Inst Management Ahmedabad, Ahmadabad, Gujarat, India
[4] Roskilde Univ, Roskilde, Denmark
关键词
Global Value Chains; Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives; Better Cotton Initiative; India; Pakistan; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; SUSTAINABILITY; CERTIFICATION; NETWORKS; BENEFITS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107312
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The Better Cotton Imitative (BCI), the world's largest multi-stakeholder initiative (MSI) for sustainable cotton production, is a prime example of a hybrid "cooperation-compliance" model used by some MSIs to engage farmers and on-farm workers in the global South. Using a mixed methods approach, we investigate the impacts of this hybrid model on economic, environmental, and labor conditions of farmers and on-farm workers on irrigated cotton farms in Pakistan and India. In one of few cross-national comparisons of BCI impacts, we find evidence that farmers participating in BCI's "cooperation-compliance" model report (a) higher gross incomes and (b) lower input costs than comparison farmers. However, (c) BCI had no positive impacts upon labor conditions on cotton farms, as compared to conventional peers. Finally, (d) BCI's impacts are mediated by institutional and geographic differences across the study sites. We conclude that effects of MSIs are hard to generalize but can most meaningfully be understood within particular institutional designs, value chains, specific time periods, and institutional contexts.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Do global innovation networks influence the status of global value chains? Based on a patent cooperation network perspective
    Xu, Shenyi
    Lian, Ganghui
    Song, Miaoyuan
    Xu, Aiting
    [J]. HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 11 (01):
  • [32] Making sense of downstream labour risk in global value chains: The case of the Australian cotton industry
    Boersma, Martijn
    Josserand, Emmanuel
    Kaine, Sarah
    Payne, Alice
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, 2022, 64 (02) : 200 - 222
  • [33] Do developing countries gain by participating in global value chains? Evidence from India
    Choorikkad Veeramani
    Garima Dhir
    [J]. Review of World Economics, 2022, 158 : 1011 - 1042
  • [34] Analysing Opportunities for India in Global Value Chains in Post COVID-19 Era
    Bagaria, Nidhi
    [J]. FOREIGN TRADE REVIEW, 2022, 57 (03) : 261 - 282
  • [35] Labour standards in global value chains in India: the case of handknotted carpet manufacturing cluster
    Giri A.K.
    Singh S.P.
    [J]. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 2016, 5 (1-2) : 37 - 52
  • [36] Do developing countries gain by participating in global value chains? Evidence from India
    Veeramani, Choorikkad
    Dhir, Garima
    [J]. REVIEW OF WORLD ECONOMICS, 2022, 158 (04) : 1011 - 1042
  • [37] The carbon footprint of India and its drivers: A structural decomposition analysis of global value chains
    Dwivedi, Arun Kumar
    Soni, Archana
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2023, 56
  • [38] Trade Agreements and Global Value Chains: New Evidence from China's Belt and Road Initiative
    Peng, Fei
    Kang, Lili
    Liu, Taoxiong
    Cheng, Jia
    Ren, Luxiao
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (04)
  • [39] Who are the producers and consumers? Value chains and food policy effects in the wheat sector in Pakistan
    Alonso, Elena Briones
    Swinnen, Johan
    [J]. FOOD POLICY, 2016, 61 : 40 - 58
  • [40] Measurement, decomposition and emission reduction effects of digital global value chains
    He, Yaxing
    Xie, Chi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 378