ECG clues for false ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction activations

被引:6
|
作者
Agrawal, Akanksha [1 ]
Lu, Marvin [1 ]
Kanjanahattakij, Napatt [1 ]
Jeon, Hee Do [1 ]
Romero-Corral, Abel [2 ]
Figueredo, Vincent [2 ]
Pressman, Gregg [2 ]
机构
[1] Albert Einstein Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Philadelphia, PA 19141 USA
[2] Albert Einstein Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Philadelphia, PA 19141 USA
关键词
activation; ECG; false; ST-elevation myocardial infarction;
D O I
10.1097/MCA.0000000000000716
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Rapid diagnosis of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is crucial for appropriate management. Catheterization for a false STEMI activation has risks including exposure to contrast agent and radiation, increased healthcare costs and delay in treatment of the primary medical condition. Patients and methods This was a single center retrospective study including all 'cath alerts' between January 2012 and December 2015. 'Cath alert' is a term used to activate the interventional cardiology team when STEMI is suspected by the emergency department physicians based on review of the initial ECG. We reviewed all STEMI alerts to understand ECG differences between true and false STEMI. Results Our study population (N = 361) included 221 (61%) men and 140 (39%) women, with average age 60 +/- 4.2 years. Among the 361 STEMI alerts, 82 (22.7%) did not have acute coronary syndrome. Common ECG causes of misdiagnosis included left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH, found in 40/82, 49%), early repolarization changes (20/82, 24%), right bundle branch block (RBBB) (13/82, 16%), and Brugada pattern (3/82, 4%). Multivariate regression analysis showed that LVH and RBBB were independent predictors of nonacute coronary syndrome false STEMI (odds ratio: 0.54; 95% confidence interval: 0.32-0.93; P = 0.03 for LVH, and odds ratio: 0.26, 95% confidence interval: 0.1-0.62, P = 0.004 for RBBB). Conclusion The incidence of false STEMI alerts was almost 23% at our center. This number might be reduced with additional training of emergency department physicians in ECG interpretation, and recognition of common causes of misdiagnosis such as LVH, early repolarization changes, RBBB, and Brugada pattern.
引用
收藏
页码:406 / 412
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ST-segment resolution as a marker for severe myocardial fibrosis in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Qian Dong
    Xuesong Wen
    Guanglei Chang
    Rui Xia
    Sihang Wang
    Yunjing Yang
    Yi Tao
    Dongying Zhang
    Shu Qin
    [J]. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 21
  • [22] ST-segment resolution as a marker for severe myocardial fibrosis in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Dong, Qian
    Wen, Xuesong
    Chang, Guanglei
    Xia, Rui
    Wang, Sihang
    Yang, Yunjing
    Tao, Yi
    Zhang, Dongying
    Qin, Shu
    [J]. BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [23] Is The Diagnosis ST-Segment Elevation or Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction?
    Tsutsumi, Katsuhiko
    Tsukahara, Kengo
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2018, 138 (23) : 2715 - 2717
  • [24] Acute ECG ST-segment elevation mimicking myocardial infarction in a patient with pulmonary embolism
    Goslar, Tomaz
    Podbregar, Matej
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR ULTRASOUND, 2010, 8
  • [25] Infarct characteristics and outcome of patients with transient ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction compared to ST-segment and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Demirkiran, A.
    Hoeven, N.
    Janssens, G.
    Lemkes, J.
    Everaars, H.
    Ven, P.
    Cauteren, Y.
    Leeuwen, M.
    Nap, A.
    Bekkers, S.
    Royen, N.
    Smulders, M.
    Rossum, A.
    Robbers, L.
    Nijveldt, R.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2020, 41 : 195 - 195
  • [26] Acute ECG ST-segment elevation mimicking myocardial infarction in a patient with pulmonary embolism
    Tomaž Goslar
    Matej Podbregar
    [J]. Cardiovascular Ultrasound, 8
  • [27] Emergency Cardiac Catheterization for "False-Positive" ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Nfor, Tonga
    Hashim, Hani
    Kostopoulos, Louie
    Gupta, Anjan
    Bajwa, Tanvir
    Allaqaband, Suhail
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2009, 120 (18) : S1008 - S1008
  • [28] Accurate Prediction of False ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Ready for Prime Time?
    Heckle, Mark R.
    Efeovbokhan, Nephertiti
    Thomas, Fridjof
    Blumer, Mary
    Chumpia, Mason
    Ibebuogu, Uzoma
    Reed, Guy L.
    Khouzam, Rami N.
    [J]. CURRENT PROBLEMS IN CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 43 (10) : 400 - 412
  • [29] Usefulness of the CODE ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Program to Improve Quality Assurance in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Ginanjar, Eka
    Sjaaf, Amal C.
    Alwi, Idrus
    Sulistiadi, Wahyu
    Darmawan, Ede Surya
    Wibowo, Adik
    Liastuti, Lies Dina
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 165 : 27 - 32
  • [30] Epidemiological characteristics of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in Peru: Results of the PEruvian Registry of ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (PERSTEMI)
    Chacon-Diaz, Manuel
    Vega, Alejandro
    Araoz, Ofelia
    Rios, Patricia
    Baltodano, Roberto
    Villanueva, Fernando
    Montesinos, Alexander
    Martos, Jorge
    Zevallos, John
    Miranda, David
    Gutierrez, Jorge
    Carasas, Jose
    Pecho, Alex
    Negron, Sandra
    Anchante, Henry
    Llerena, Nassip
    Yabar, German
    Chumbe, Javier
    Ramirez, Sara
    Lazo, Marco
    Sotomayor, Jorge
    Lopez, Marco
    Perez, Carlos
    [J]. ARCHIVOS DE CARDIOLOGIA DE MEXICO, 2018, 88 (05): : 403 - 412