When companies improve the sustainability of the natural environment: A study of large US companies

被引:14
|
作者
De Mendonca, Taryn [1 ]
Zhou, Yan [1 ]
机构
[1] Harbin Inst Technol, Sch Management, 13 Fayuan St, Harbin 150001, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China
关键词
competitive advantage; government regulation; proactive environmental strategies; social movement pressure; sustainability; CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY; SOCIAL-MOVEMENTS; STRATEGIC RESPONSES; ADVANTAGE THEORY; FIRMS; PERFORMANCE; MODEL; DETERMINANTS; PROACTIVITY; MOTIVATION;
D O I
10.1002/bse.2398
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In light of the call for companies to abandon current approaches to environmental management, this study adds to the environmental strategy literature and uses the evidence of competitive dynamics among companies to identify a mechanism by which companies invest in proactive environmental strategies and thereby improve the sustainability of the natural environment. An examination utilizing fixed effects regressions on a sample of large U.S.-based companies reveal that even after controlling the number, environmental and financial performance of leading (environmental) companies, laggard (environmental) companies are more likely to invest in proactive environmental strategies when their leading peers display higher sustainability orientations. Neither the expectation of government regulation nor social movement pressure was found to be influential in this relationship. Therefore, the future dominance of companies' investments in the sustainability of the natural environment will be driven by companies themselves as long as competitive advantages are expected.
引用
收藏
页码:801 / 811
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Sustainability reporting in construction companies: An Australian Study
    Davidson, Kathryn
    Wilson, Lou
    Zuo, Jian
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUCTION & RISK MANAGEMENT, VOLS I AND II, 2010, : 922 - 926
  • [12] Natural gas back in favour with US power companies
    Jeff Tollefson
    Nature, 2008, 451 : 753 - 753
  • [13] Natural gas back in favour with US power companies
    Tollefson, Jeff
    NATURE, 2008, 451 (7180) : 753 - 753
  • [14] The systemic risk of US oil and natural gas companies
    Caporin, Massimiliano
    Fontini, Fulvio
    Panzica, Roberto
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2023, 121
  • [15] Environmental Performance, Customer Satisfaction, and Profitability: A Study among Large US Companies
    De Mendonca, Taryn Renatta
    Zhou, Yan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (19)
  • [16] SUSTAINABILITY IN LARGE UK LISTED RETAIL COMPANIES: A SECTORAL ANALYSIS
    Keay, Andrew
    Iqbal, Taskin
    DEAKIN LAW REVIEW, 2018, 23 : 209 - 244
  • [17] Benchmarking the performance of water companies for regulatory purposes to improve its sustainability
    Sala-Garrido, Ramon
    Mocholi-Arce, Manuel
    Maziotis, Alexandros
    Molinos-Senante, Maria
    NPJ CLEAN WATER, 2023, 6 (01)
  • [18] Benchmarking the performance of water companies for regulatory purposes to improve its sustainability
    Ramon Sala-Garrido
    Manuel Mocholí-Arce
    Alexandros Maziotis
    Maria Molinos-Senante
    npj Clean Water, 6
  • [19] Freedom-Form Companies as an Enabling Environment: A Way to Human Sustainability?
    Retaux, Xavier
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH CONGRESS OF THE INTERNATIONAL ERGONOMICS ASSOCIATION (IEA 2018), VOL 8: ERGONOMICS AND HUMAN FACTORS IN MANUFACTURING, AGRICULTURE, BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION, SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND MINING, 2019, 825 : 737 - 745
  • [20] A Study on Sustainability Indicators for Energy Companies in Viet Nam
    Tsai, Jung-Fa
    Lee, Ruey-Chu
    Tran, Dinh-Hieu
    Hoang, Minh-Chau
    Lin, Ming-Hua
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (03)