The surgical outcome of decompression alone versus decompression with limited fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis

被引:19
|
作者
Masuda, Kenji [1 ]
Higashi, Takayuki [1 ]
Yamada, Katsutaka [1 ]
Sekiya, Tatsuhiro [1 ]
Saito, Tomoyuki [1 ]
机构
[1] Yokohama City Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Sch Med, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
关键词
degenerative lumbar scoliosis; decompression; short segmental fusion; criteria for intervertebral instability; SPINAL DEFORMITY; SURGERY; MANAGEMENT; STENOSIS;
D O I
10.3171/2018.1.SPINE17879
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of radiological parameters for surgical decision-making in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) by comparing the clinical and radiological results after decompression or decompression and fusion surgery. METHODS The authors prospectively planned surgical treatment for 298 patients with degenerative lumbar disease between September 2005 and March 2013. The surgical method used at their institution to address intervertebral instability is precisely defined based on radiological parameters. Among 64 patients with a Cobb angle ranging from 10 degrees to 25 degrees, 57 patients who underwent follow-up for more than 2 years postoperatively were evaluated. These patients were divided into 2 groups: those in the decompression group underwent decompression alone (n = 25), and those in the fusion group underwent decompression and short segmental fusion (n = 32). Surgical outcomes were reviewed, including preoperative and postoperative Cobb angles, lumbar lordosis based on radiological parameters, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores. RESULTS The JOA scores of the decompression group and fusion group improved from 5.9 +/- 1.6 to 10.0 +/- 2.8 and from 7.2 +/- 2.0 to 11.3 +/- 2.8, respectively, which was not significantly different between the groups. At the final followup, the postoperative Cobb angle in the decompression group changed from 14 degrees +/- 2.9 degrees to 14.3 degrees +/- 6.4 degrees and remained stable, while the Cobb angle in the fusion group decreased from 14.8 degrees +/- 4.0 degrees to 10.0 degrees +/- 8.5 degrees after surgery. CONCLUSIONS The patients in both groups demonstrated improved JOA scores and preserved Cobb angles after surgery. The improvement in JOA scores and preservation of Cobb angles in both groups show that the evaluation of spinal instability using radiological parameters is appropriate for surgical decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 264
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of the Efficacy of Decompression Alone and Decompression with Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis
    Zhao, Wei
    Qiao, Huyun
    Li, Chunjiang
    Guan, Haishan
    BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2021, 128 : 27 - 28
  • [2] Surgical Outcomes of Decompression, Decompression With Limited Fusion, and Decompression With Full Curve Fusion for Degenerative Scoliosis With Radiculopathy
    Transfeldt, Ensor E.
    Topp, Raymond
    Mehbod, Amir A.
    Winter, Robert B.
    SPINE, 2010, 35 (20) : 1872 - 1875
  • [3] Decompression alone or decompression and fusion in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis
    Wei, Fei-Long
    Zhou, Cheng-Pei
    Gao, Quan-You
    Du, Ming-Rui
    Gao, Hao-Ran
    Zhu, Kai-Long
    Li, Tian
    Qian, Ji-Xian
    Yan, Xiao-Dong
    ECLINICALMEDICINE, 2022, 51
  • [4] Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression Alone Versus Limited Decompression/Fusion in the Treatment of Adult Degenerative Scoliosis: A Retrospective Study
    Zhang, Yao
    Lin, Wancheng
    Lian, Xin
    Ding, Lixiang
    Song, Jipeng
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2024,
  • [5] Decompression Alone Versus Decompression and Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Meta-Analysis
    Chen, Zihao
    Xie, Peigen
    Feng, Feng
    Chhantyal, Kishor
    Yang, Yang
    Rong, Limin
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 111 : E158 - E170
  • [6] Limited Improvement With Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Alone for Degenerative Scoliosis With Cobb Angle Over 20° The Impact of Decompression Location
    Asada, Tomoyuki
    Simon, Chad Z.
    Singh, Nishtha
    Tuma, Olivia
    Subramanian, Tejas
    Araghi, Kasra
    Lu, Amy Z.
    Mai, Eric
    Kim, Yeo Eun
    Allen, Myles R. J.
    Korsun, Maximilian
    Zhang, Joshua
    Kwas, Cole
    Singh, Sumedha
    Dowdell, James
    Sheha, Evan D.
    Qureshi, Sheeraz A.
    Iyer, Sravisht
    SPINE, 2024, 49 (15) : 1037 - 1045
  • [7] Decompression plus fusion versus decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liang, Hai-Feng
    Liu, Shu-Hao
    Chen, Zi-Xian
    Fei, Qin-Ming
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 26 (12) : 3084 - 3095
  • [8] Decompression plus fusion versus decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hai-Feng Liang
    Shu-Hao Liu
    Zi-Xian Chen
    Qin-Ming Fei
    European Spine Journal, 2017, 26 : 3084 - 3095
  • [9] Outcome of Decompression Alone Versus Decompression Plus Transpedicular Screw Fixation in the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spine Stenosis
    Ullah, Abid
    Sabir, Nadeem
    Ansari, Hizbullah Riaz
    Atta, Malik Ahsan
    Aziz, Mohammad Omer
    Zaman, Atiq Uz
    Aziz, Amer
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2022, 16 (01): : 90 - 91
  • [10] Decompression Versus Decompression and Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis in a Workers' Compensation Setting
    Tye, Erik Y.
    Anderson, Joshua
    Haas, Arnold
    Percy, Rick
    Woods, Stephen T.
    Ahn, Nicholas
    SPINE, 2017, 42 (13) : 1017 - 1023