EDI and barcoding in the homecenter industry: 1992 vs. 1998

被引:0
|
作者
Roadcap, CA
Smith, PM
Vlosky, RP
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Louisiana State Univ, Sch Forestry Wildlife & Fisheries, Ctr Agr, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
As competition increases in the $118-billion homecenter industry, homecenter retailers are implementing technologies such as Electronic Data interchange (EDI) and barcoding at the unit and piece levels in order to develop or maintain a competitive advantage. This article discusses the degree to which EDI, unit-level barcoding, and point-of-sale (POS) scanning of piece-level barcodes were used by large U.S. homecenters in 1998. The research is longitudinal in that it extends a 1992 benchmark study by Vlosky and Smith (30,31). Consistent with the 1992 study, our sample included the 500 largest homecenter retail companies (by sales) in the United States. This group of large homecenters represented 75 percent ($80 billion) of the total homecenter industry sales in 1997. Results From our study indicate that overall adoption of these technologies by homecenters increased dramatically between 1992 and 1998. In general, across all supplier sectors, homecenter respondent implementation of unit-level barcoding, POS scanning, and EDI increased by 262 percent, 236 percent, and 189 percent, respectively. When examining implementation specifically with woodproducts suppliers, homecenter implementation increased 474 percent, 353 percent, and 493 percent for unit-level barcode scanning, POS scanning wood product merchandise, and EDI relations with wood products suppliers, respectively Results also show that our study respondents implemented unit-level barcoding primarily to reduce data-entry errors and to improve inventory management and control. Respondents implemented EDI mainly to increase data accuracy, create a cost savings, and speed up product replenishment.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 38
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Revolution 4.0: Industry vs. Agriculture in a Future Development for SMEs
    Zambon, Ilaria
    Cecchini, Massimo
    Egidi, Gianluca
    Saporito, Maria Grazia
    Colantoni, Andrea
    PROCESSES, 2019, 7 (01)
  • [32] Comparison of Research Based vs. Industry Developed PSS Models
    Ryan, Linda
    Tormey, David
    Share, Perry
    EXPLORING SERVICES SCIENCE, 2011, 82 : 216 - +
  • [33] New vs. "old" economy: insights on competitiveness in the global IT industry
    Carayannis, E
    Sagi, J
    TECHNOVATION, 2001, 21 (08) : 501 - 514
  • [34] EFFICIENCY VS. CONSERVATION? COMPETING FRAMINGS AND THE FUTURE OF THE LIGHTING INDUSTRY
    Franceschini, Simone
    Pansera, Mario
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013,
  • [35] Extending the firm vs. industry debate: Does industry life cycle stage matter?
    Karniouchina, Ekaterina V.
    Carson, Stephen J.
    Short, Jeremy C.
    Ketchen, David J., Jr.
    STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2013, 34 (08) : 1010 - 1018
  • [36] Clicks vs. bricks in the emerging online financial services industry
    Hensmans, M
    van den Bosch, FAJ
    Volberda, HW
    LONG RANGE PLANNING, 2001, 34 (02) : 231 - 247
  • [37] Project Management in Development Aid Industry - Public vs. Private
    Simovic, Dragana
    CROATIAN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS REVIEW, 2015, 21 (72): : 167 - 197
  • [38] Deaboriginization of Russian Sociological Expertise Industry: Dispute Vs. Conquista
    Bumagin, Roman
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SOCIOLOGY-EKONOMICHESKAYA SOTSIOLOGIYA, 2019, 20 (02): : 183 - 193
  • [39] The extension service and the beef industry: Yesterday vs. today.
    Paterson, J. A.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2007, 85 : 156 - 156
  • [40] DEFENSE INDUSTRY FINANCING - PUBLIC CREDIT VS. BANK CREDIT
    Suhan, Florin
    EUROPEAN FINANCE, BUSINESS AND REGULATION (EUFIRE 2020), 2020, : 77 - 87