Use of Biosolids to Enhance Rangeland Forage Quality

被引:11
|
作者
McFarland, Michael J. [1 ]
Vasquez, Issaak Romero [1 ]
Vutran, MaiAnh [1 ]
Schmitz, Mark [3 ]
Brobst, Robert B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Utah State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Logan, UT 84321 USA
[2] US EPA, Denver, CO USA
[3] State Utah Dept Environm Qual, Div Water Qual, Salt Lake City, UT USA
关键词
rangelands; biosolids; invasive species; PLANT;
D O I
10.2175/106143009X12529484815872
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Biosolids land application was demonstrated to be a potentially cost-effective means for restoring forage productivity and enhancing soil-moisture-holding capacity on disturbed rangelands. By land-applying aerobically digested, anaerobically digested, composted, and lime-stabilized biosolids on rangeland test plots at rates of up to 20 times (20X) the estimated nitrogen-based agronomic rate, forage yields were found to increase from 132.8 kg/ha (118.2 lb/ac) ( control plots) to 1182.3 kg/ha (1052.8 lb/ac). Despite the environmental benefits associated with increased forage yield (e.g., reduced soil erosion, improved drainage, and enhanced terrestrial carbon sequestration), the type of forage generated both before and after biosolids land application was found to be dominated by invasive weeds, all of which were characterized as having fair to poor nutritional value. Opportunistic and shallow rooting invasive weeds not only have marginal nutritional value, they also limit the establishment of native perennial grasses and thus biodiversity. Many of the identified invasive species (e.g., Cheatgrass) mature early, a characteristic that significantly increases the fuel loads that support the increased frequency and extent of western wildfires. Water Environ. Res., 82, 455 ( 2010).
引用
收藏
页码:455 / 461
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Wild bison as ecological indicators of the effectiveness of management practices to increase forage quality on open rangeland
    Ranglack, Dustin H.
    du Toit, Johan T.
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2015, 56 : 145 - 151
  • [22] SWITCHGRASSES - FORAGE YIELD, FORAGE QUALITY AND WATER-USE EFFICIENCY
    KOSHI, PT
    STUBBENDIECK, J
    ECK, HV
    MCCULLY, WG
    JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT, 1982, 35 (05): : 623 - 627
  • [23] COW WEIGHTS AND REPRODUCTION ON NATIVE RANGELAND AND NATIVE RANGELAND-COMPLEMENTARY FORAGE SYSTEMS
    SIMS, PL
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1993, 71 (07) : 1704 - 1711
  • [24] Environmental Impact of Exceptional Quality Biosolids Use in Urban Agriculture
    Alvarez-Cannpos, Odiney
    Evanylo, Gregory K.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2019, 48 (06) : 1872 - 1880
  • [25] Evidence That Forage-Fed Cows Can Enhance Milk Quality
    Davis, Hannah
    Chatzidimitriou, Eleni
    Leifert, Carlo
    Butler, Gillian
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (09)
  • [26] Application of biosolids to degraded semiarid rangeland: Nine-year responses
    White, CS
    Loftin, SR
    Aguilar, R
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1997, 26 (06) : 1663 - 1671
  • [27] A review of forage legume research for rangeland improvement in Zimbabwe
    Mapiye, C.
    Mupangwa, J. F.
    Mugabe, P. H.
    Chikumba, N.
    Poshiwa, X.
    Foti, R.
    TROPICAL GRASSLANDS, 2006, 40 (03): : 145 - 149
  • [28] A comprehensive approach of Botanical Compositions and Forage Yields in a Rangeland
    Alper, Babalik Ahmet
    Kamil, Kilic
    RESEARCH JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2015, 10 (10): : 14 - 20
  • [29] CANE BLUESTEMS - FORAGE YIELD, FORAGE QUALITY AND WATER-USE EFFICIENCY
    KOSHI, PT
    ECK, HV
    STUBBENDIECK, J
    MCCULLY, WG
    JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT, 1977, 30 (03): : 190 - 193
  • [30] Considering Spatiotemporal Forage Variability in Rangeland Inventory and Monitoring
    Zimmer, Scott N.
    Schupp, Eugene W.
    Boettinger, Janis L.
    Reeves, Matt C.
    Thacker, Eric T.
    RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2021, 79 (01) : 53 - 63