Use of Biosolids to Enhance Rangeland Forage Quality

被引:11
|
作者
McFarland, Michael J. [1 ]
Vasquez, Issaak Romero [1 ]
Vutran, MaiAnh [1 ]
Schmitz, Mark [3 ]
Brobst, Robert B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Utah State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Logan, UT 84321 USA
[2] US EPA, Denver, CO USA
[3] State Utah Dept Environm Qual, Div Water Qual, Salt Lake City, UT USA
关键词
rangelands; biosolids; invasive species; PLANT;
D O I
10.2175/106143009X12529484815872
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Biosolids land application was demonstrated to be a potentially cost-effective means for restoring forage productivity and enhancing soil-moisture-holding capacity on disturbed rangelands. By land-applying aerobically digested, anaerobically digested, composted, and lime-stabilized biosolids on rangeland test plots at rates of up to 20 times (20X) the estimated nitrogen-based agronomic rate, forage yields were found to increase from 132.8 kg/ha (118.2 lb/ac) ( control plots) to 1182.3 kg/ha (1052.8 lb/ac). Despite the environmental benefits associated with increased forage yield (e.g., reduced soil erosion, improved drainage, and enhanced terrestrial carbon sequestration), the type of forage generated both before and after biosolids land application was found to be dominated by invasive weeds, all of which were characterized as having fair to poor nutritional value. Opportunistic and shallow rooting invasive weeds not only have marginal nutritional value, they also limit the establishment of native perennial grasses and thus biodiversity. Many of the identified invasive species (e.g., Cheatgrass) mature early, a characteristic that significantly increases the fuel loads that support the increased frequency and extent of western wildfires. Water Environ. Res., 82, 455 ( 2010).
引用
收藏
页码:455 / 461
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMPARISON OF CURRENT FORAGE YIELD AND SOME FORAGE QUALITY PARAMETERS OF DIFFERENT RANGELAND SITES
    Gullap, Mehmet Kerim
    FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2021, 30 (12): : 13290 - 13296
  • [2] HANDBOOK OF FORAGE AND RANGELAND INSECTS
    Pelzer, Nancy
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & FOOD INFORMATION, 2008, 9 (03) : 266 - 267
  • [3] The effects of traditional grazing practices on upland (yayla) rangeland vegetation and forage quality
    Comakli, Binali
    Dasci, Mahmut
    Koc, Ali
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY, 2008, 32 (04) : 259 - 265
  • [4] MICROWAVE DRYING OF RANGELAND FORAGE SAMPLES
    SCHUMAN, GE
    RAUZI, F
    JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT, 1981, 34 (05): : 426 - 428
  • [5] Using municipal biosolids to bring new life to rangeland
    Glass, S
    BIOCYCLE, 2000, 41 (04) : 60 - 61
  • [6] Perennial Forage Systems Enhance Ecosystem Quality Variables Compared with Annual Forage Systems
    Igboke, Ogechukwu
    Bortolon, Elisandra S. O.
    Ashworth, Amanda J.
    Tallaksen, Joel
    Picasso, Valentin D.
    Berti, Marisol T.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (23)
  • [7] Fungal and Oomycete Pathogens Reduce Rangeland Quality Mainly Through Decreasing Forage Production
    Sun, Xinhang
    Peng, Sichen
    Zhao, Yimin
    Nie, Yu
    Qi, Yanwen
    Zhang, Zhenhua
    Zhou, Shurong
    ECOSYSTEMS, 2024, 27 (02) : 265 - 277
  • [8] Fungal and Oomycete Pathogens Reduce Rangeland Quality Mainly Through Decreasing Forage Production
    Xinhang Sun
    Sichen Peng
    Yimin Zhao
    Yu Nie
    Yanwen Qi
    Zhenhua Zhang
    Shurong Zhou
    Ecosystems, 2024, 27 : 265 - 277
  • [9] PLANT CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND DIGESTIBILITY OF RANGELAND FORAGE
    BALL, R
    WAGNER, DG
    POWELL, J
    HAMMOND, RW
    OKLAHOMA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATION, 1978, (103): : 60 - 63
  • [10] Modeling ammonia volatilization from biosolids applied to semiarid rangeland
    Texas Tech Univ, Lubbock, United States
    Soil Sci Soc Am J, 6 (1794-1798):