Hypothesis testing with error correction models

被引:3
|
作者
Kraft, Patrick W. [1 ]
Key, Ellen M. [2 ]
Lebo, Matthew J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA
[2] Appalachian State Univ, Boone, NC 28608 USA
[3] Univ Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
关键词
Time series models; PUBLIC-OPINION; PARTY SUPPORT; TIME; DYNAMICS; COINTEGRATION; INFERENCE;
D O I
10.1017/psrm.2021.41
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Grant and Lebo (2016) and Keele et al. (2016) clarify the conditions under which the popular general error correction model (GECM) can be used and interpreted easily: In a bivariate GECM the data must be integrated in order to rely on the error correction coefficient, alpha(1)*, to test cointegration and measure the rate of error correction between a single exogenous x and a dependent variable, y. Here we demonstrate that even if the data are all integrated, the test on alpha(1)* is misunderstood when there is more than a single independent variable. The null hypothesis is that there is no cointegration between y and any x but the correct alternative hypothesis is that y is cointegrated with at least one but not necessarily more than one of the x's. A significant alpha(1)* can occur when some i(1) regressors are not cointegrated and the equation is not balanced. Thus, the correct limiting distributions of the righthand-side long-run coefficients may be unknown. We use simulations to demonstrate the problem and then discuss implications for applied examples.
引用
收藏
页码:870 / 878
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条