A RISK-INFORMED METHODOLOGY FOR ASME SECTION XI, APPENDIX G

被引:0
|
作者
Gamble, Ronald [1 ]
Server, William [1 ]
Bishop, Bruce [1 ]
Palm, Nathan [1 ]
Heinecke, Carol [1 ]
机构
[1] Sartrex Corp, Rockville, MD USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code [1], Section XI, Appendix G provides a deterministic procedure for defining Service Level A and B pressure-temperature limits for ferritic components in the reactor coolant pressure boundary. An alternative risk-informed methodology has been developed for ASME Section XI, Appendix G. This alternative methodology provides easy to use procedures to define risk-informed pressure-temperature limits for Service Level A and B events, including leak testing and reactor start-up and shut-down. Risk-informed pressure-temperature limits provide more operational flexibility, particularly for reactor pressure vessels with relatively high irradiation levels and radiation sensitive materials. This work evaluated selected plants spanning the population of pressurized water reactors (PWRs) and boiling water reactors (BWRs). The evaluation included determining appropriate material properties, reviewing operating history and system operational constraints, and performing probabilistic fracture mechanics analyses. The analysis results were used to define risk-informed pressure-temperature relationships that comply with safety goals defined by the United States (U.S.) Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This alternative methodology will provide greater operational flexibility, especially for Service Level A and B events that may adversely affect efficient and safe plant operation, such as low- temperature-over-pressurization (LTOP) for PWRs and system leak testing for BWRs. Overall, application of this methodology can result in increased plant efficiency, and increased plant and personnel safety.
引用
收藏
页码:671 / 685
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] REVISION TO STRESS INTENSITY FACTOR EQUATIONS FOR ASME SECTION XI APPENDIX C-4000, DETERMINATION OF FAILURE MODE
    Hojo, Kiminobu
    Xu, Steven
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING CONFERENCE, 2018, VOL 1A, 2019,
  • [42] BASIS BACKGROUND FOR ASME CODE SECTION-XI PROPOSED APPENDIX-VIII - ULTRASONIC EXAMINATION PERFORMANCE DEMONSTRATION
    COWFER, CD
    [J]. NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 1991, 131 (03) : 313 - 317
  • [43] EXPERIENCE WITH ASME SECTION-XI FLAW EVALUATION
    RICCARDELLA, PC
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1984, 46 : 674 - 676
  • [44] Risk-informed decision making with PARAGON™
    Shanley, L
    True, D
    Parsley, E
    Steinmetz, J
    Burchill, W
    [J]. PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, VOL 1- 6, 2004, : 450 - 455
  • [45] ASME SECTION-XI - PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE
    CHOCKIE, LJ
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1984, 46 : 672 - 672
  • [46] Realising the potential of risk-informed PrEP
    Schaefer, Robin
    Schmidt, Heather-Marie A.
    [J]. LANCET HIV, 2022, 9 (05): : E302 - E304
  • [47] INTEGRITY RISK-INFORMED DECISION MAKING
    Hassanien, Sherif
    Langer, Doug
    Abdolrazaghi, Mona
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL PIPELINE CONFERENCE, 2018, VOL 2, 2018,
  • [48] Quantitative Risk-Informed Design of Levees
    Sibley, Heather M.
    Vroman, Noah D.
    Shewbridge, Scott E.
    [J]. GEO-RISK 2017: IMPACT OF SPATIAL VARIABILITY, PROBABILISTIC SITE CHARACTERIZATION, AND GEOHAZARDS, 2017, (284): : 76 - 90
  • [49] Defaults and incentives in risk-informed regulation
    Bier, VM
    Jang, SC
    [J]. HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 1999, 5 (04): : 635 - 644
  • [50] RISK-INFORMED SAFETY MARGIN CHARACTERIZATION
    Hess, Stephen M.
    Dinh, Nam
    Gaertner, John P.
    Szilard, Ronaldo
    [J]. ICONE 17: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEAR ENGINEERING, VOL 1, 2009, : 11 - 17