Development of an Orofacial Esthetic Scale in Prosthodontic Patients

被引:0
|
作者
Larsson, Pernilla [1 ]
John, Mike T. [2 ,3 ]
Nilner, Krister [4 ]
Bondemark, Lars [5 ]
List, Thomas [6 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Oral Rehab, SE-58185 Linkoping, Sweden
[2] Univ Minnesota, Dept Diagnost & Biol Sci, Minneapolis, MN USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Div Epidemiol & Community Hlth, Minneapolis, MN USA
[4] Malmo Univ, Dept Prosthet Dent, Fac Odontol, Malmo, Sweden
[5] Malmo Univ, Dept Orthodont, Fac Odontol, Malmo, Sweden
[6] Malmo Univ, Dept Stomatognath Physiol, Fac Odontol, Malmo, Sweden
关键词
ORAL-HEALTH IMPACT; DENTAL AESTHETICS; SHORT-FORM; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; VALIDATION; SMILE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: Despite the interest and need to assess orofacial esthetics in prosthodontic patients, few self-reporting instruments are available to measure this construct, and none describe how prosthodontic patients perceive the appearance of their face, mouth, teeth, and dentures. The development of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale (DES) is reported in this article, in particular its conceptual framework, how questionnaire items were generated, and the scale's measurement model. Materials and Methods: After test conceptualization, the authors solicited esthetic concerns from 17 prosthodontic patients by asking them to evaluate their own photographs. A focus group of 8 dental professionals reduced the initial number of concerns/items and decided on an item response format. Pilot testing in 9 subjects generated the final instrument, the DES. Exploratory factor analysis was performed to investigate DES dimensionality and item analysis to investigate item difficulty and discrimination in 119 subjects. Results: Prosthodontic patients generated an initial 28 esthetic concerns. These items were reduced to 8 preliminary representative items that were subsequently confirmed during pilot testing. Analysis supported 8 items assessing appearance: face, profile, mouth, tooth alignment, tooth shape, tooth color, gums, and overall impression, measured on an 11-point numeric rating scale (0 = very dissatisfied, 10 = very satisfied). Exploratory factor analysis found only 1 factor and high positive loadings for all items (.73 to .94) on the first factor, supporting the unidimensionality of the DES. Conclusions: The OES, developed especially for prosthodontic patients, is a brief questionnaire that assesses orofacial esthetic impacts. Int J Prosthodont 2010;23: 249-256.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 256
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Psychometric properties of the Albanian version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale: OES-ALB
    Venera Bimbashi
    Asja Čelebić
    Gloria Staka
    Flurije Hoxha
    Sanja Peršić
    Nikola Petričević
    BMC Oral Health, 15
  • [22] Esthetic prosthodontic treatment - The state-of-the-art
    Yatani, Hirofumi
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTIC RESEARCH, 2015, 59 (04) : 216 - 219
  • [23] ORTHODONTIC AND PROSTHODONTIC INTERRELATIONSHIP FOR A COMPREHENSIVE ESTHETIC OUTCOME
    Hotchandani, Arshin
    Desai, Hina
    Nirmal, N. J.
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2014, 3 (39): : 9913 - 9917
  • [24] Prosthodontic Treatment in Patients with Temporomandibular Disorders and Orofacial Pain and/or Bruxism: A Review of the Literature
    Minervini, Giuseppe
    Fiorillo, Luca
    Russo, Diana
    Lanza, Alessandro
    D'Amico, Cesare
    Cervino, Gabriele
    Meto, Aida
    Di Francesco, Fabrizio
    PROSTHESIS, 2022, 4 (02): : 253 - 262
  • [25] Comparison of two rating scales with the orofacial esthetic scale and practical recommendations for its application
    Swaha Pattanaik
    Mike T. John
    Seungwon Chung
    San Keller
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 20
  • [26] Assessment of differential item functioning across English and Spanish versions of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale
    Pattanaik, Swaha
    John, Mike T.
    Chung, Seungwon
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2021, 48 (01) : 73 - 80
  • [27] PROSTHODONTIC MANAGEMENT OF TEMPOROMANDIBULAR DISORDERS AND OROFACIAL PAIN
    LITVAK, H
    MALAMENT, KA
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1993, 69 (01): : 77 - 84
  • [28] Comparison of two rating scales with the orofacial esthetic scale and practical recommendations for its application
    Pattanaik, Swaha
    John, Mike T.
    Chung, Seungwon
    Keller, San
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2022, 20 (01)
  • [29] Psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale (OES-NL) in dental patients with and without self-reported tooth wear
    Wetselaar, P.
    Koutris, M.
    Visscher, C. M.
    Larsson, P.
    John, M. T.
    Lobbezoo, F.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2015, 42 (11) : 803 - 809
  • [30] Development and validation of the Manchester orofacial pain disability scale
    Aggarwal, VR
    Lunt, M
    Zakrzewska, JM
    Macfarlane, GJ
    Macfarlane, TV
    COMMUNITY DENTISTRY AND ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 33 (02) : 141 - 149