Decision-Level and Feature-Level Integration of Remote Sensing and Geospatial Big Data for Urban Land Use Mapping

被引:0
|
作者
Yin, Jiadi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Fu, Ping [1 ,2 ]
Hamm, Nicholas A. S. [1 ,2 ]
Li, Zhichao [3 ]
You, Nanshan [3 ,4 ]
He, Yingli [3 ,4 ]
Cheshmehzangi, Ali [5 ]
Dong, Jinwei [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham Ningbo China, Sch Geog Sci, Fac Sci & Engn, Ningbo 315100, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Nottingham Ningbo China, Geospatial & Geohazards Res Grp, Fac Sci & Engn, Ningbo 315100, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Key Lab Land Surface Pattern & Simulat, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Nottingham Ningbo China, Dept Architecture & Built Environm, Ningbo 315100, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
urban land use; remote sensing; geospatial big data; decision-level integration; feature-level integration; Hangzhou; GOOGLE EARTH ENGINE; TIME-SERIES; SOCIAL-MEDIA; USE CLASSIFICATION; FUNCTIONAL ZONES; COVER; IMAGERY; AREA; SURFACE; POPULATION;
D O I
10.3390/rs13081579
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Information about urban land use is important for urban planning and sustainable development. The emergence of geospatial big data (GBD), increased the availability of remotely sensed (RS) data and the development of new methods for data integration to provide new opportunities for mapping types of urban land use. However, the modes of RS and GBD integration are diverse due to the differences in data, study areas, classifiers, etc. In this context, this study aims to summarize the main methods of data integration and evaluate them via a case study of urban land use mapping in Hangzhou, China. We first categorized the RS and GBD integration methods into decision-level integration (DI) and feature-level integration (FI) and analyzed their main differences by reviewing the existing literature. The two methods were then applied for mapping urban land use types in Hangzhou city, based on urban parcels derived from the OpenStreetMap (OSM) road network, 10 m Sentinel-2A images, and points of interest (POI). The corresponding classification results were validated quantitatively and qualitatively using the same testing dataset. Finally, we illustrated the advantages and disadvantages of both approaches via bibliographic evidence and quantitative analysis. The results showed that: (1) The visual comparison indicates a generally better performance of DI-based classification than FI-based classification; (2) DI-based urban land use mapping is easy to implement, while FI-based land use mapping enables the mixture of features; (3) DI-based and FI-based methods can be used together to improve urban land use mapping, as they have different performances when classifying different types of land use. This study provides an improved understanding of urban land use mapping in terms of the RS and GBD integration strategy.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Integrating remote sensing and geospatial big data for urban land use mapping: A review
    Yin, Jiadi
    Dong, Jinwei
    Hamm, Nicholas A. S.
    Li, Zhichao
    Wang, Jianghao
    Xing, Hanfa
    Fu, Ping
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2021, 103
  • [2] Feature-level and decision-level fusion of noncoincidently sampled sensors for land mine detection
    Gunatilaka, AH
    Baertlein, BA
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2001, 23 (06) : 577 - 589
  • [3] Integrating Remote Sensing and Geospatial Big Data for Land Cover and Land Use Mapping and Monitoring
    See, Linda
    Lesiv, Myroslava
    Schepaschenko, Dmitry
    [J]. LAND, 2024, 13 (06)
  • [4] An extension of iterative scaling for joint decision-level and feature-level fusion in ensemble classification
    Miller, DJ
    Pal, S
    [J]. 2005 IEEE WORKSHOP ON MACHINE LEARNING FOR SIGNAL PROCESSING (MLSP), 2005, : 61 - 66
  • [5] Combining feature-level and decision-level fusion in a hierarchical classifier for emotion recognition in the wild
    Sun, Bo
    Li, Liandong
    Wu, Xuewen
    Zuo, Tian
    Chen, Ying
    Zhou, Guoyan
    He, Jun
    Zhu, Xiaoming
    [J]. JOURNAL ON MULTIMODAL USER INTERFACES, 2016, 10 (02) : 125 - 137
  • [6] Combining feature-level and decision-level fusion in a hierarchical classifier for emotion recognition in the wild
    Bo Sun
    Liandong Li
    Xuewen Wu
    Tian Zuo
    Ying Chen
    Guoyan Zhou
    Jun He
    Xiaoming Zhu
    [J]. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces, 2016, 10 : 125 - 137
  • [7] Machine Learning-Based Ensemble Prediction of Water-Quality Variables Using Feature-Level and Decision-Level Fusion with Proximal Remote Sensing
    Peterson, Kyle T.
    Sagan, Vasit
    Sidike, Paheding
    Hasenmueller, Elizabeth A.
    Sloan, John J.
    Knouft, Jason H.
    [J]. PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 85 (04): : 269 - 280
  • [8] Multimodal Emotion Recognition Framework Using a Decision-Level Fusion and Feature-Level Fusion Approach
    Devi, C. Akalya
    Renuka, D.
    [J]. IETE JOURNAL OF RESEARCH, 2023, 69 (12) : 8909 - 8920
  • [9] Comparison between Decision-Level and Feature-Level Fusion of Acoustic and Linguistic Features for Spontaneous Emotion Recognition
    Planet, Santiago
    Iriondo, Ignasi
    [J]. 7TH IBERIAN CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES (CISTI 2012), 2012,
  • [10] Comparison between Decision-Level and Feature-Level Fusion of Acoustic and Linguistic Features for Spontaneous Emotion Recognition
    Planet, Santiago
    Iriondo, Ignasi
    [J]. SISTEMAS Y TECNOLOGIAS DE INFORMACION, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2012, : 199 - 204