Integrating remote sensing and geospatial big data for urban land use mapping: A review

被引:93
|
作者
Yin, Jiadi [1 ,2 ]
Dong, Jinwei [1 ]
Hamm, Nicholas A. S. [2 ]
Li, Zhichao [1 ]
Wang, Jianghao [3 ]
Xing, Hanfa [4 ,5 ]
Fu, Ping [2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Land Surface Pattern & Simulat, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Nottingham, Sch Geog Sci & Geospatial Res Grp, Fac Sci & Engn, Ningbo 315100, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, State Key Lab Resources & Environm Informat Syst, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[4] Shandong Normal Univ, Coll Geog & Environm, Jinan 250300, Peoples R China
[5] South China Normal Univ, Sch Geog, Guangzhou 510631, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Integration methods; Urban functional zone classification; Urban management; Land use; SOCIAL-MEDIA DATA; GOOGLE EARTH ENGINE; COVER CLASSIFICATION; IMPERVIOUS SURFACE; TIME-SERIES; IMAGERY; METRICS; TWITTER; REGION; AREAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jag.2021.102514
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
Remote Sensing (RS) has been used in urban mapping for a long time; however, the complexity and diversity of urban functional patterns are difficult to be captured by RS only. Emerging Geospatial Big Data (GBD) are considered as the supplement to RS data, and help to contribute to our understanding of urban lands from physical aspects (i.e., urban land cover) to socioeconomic aspects (i.e., urban land use). Integrating RS and GBD could be an effective way to combine physical and socioeconomic aspects with great potential for high-quality urban land use classification. In this study, we reviewed the existing literature and focused on the state-of-the-art and perspective of the urban land use categorization by integrating RS and GBD. Specifically, the commonly used RS features (e.g., spectral, textural, temporal, and spatial features) and GBD features (e.g., spatial, temporal, semantic, and sequence features) were identified and analyzed in urban land use classification. The integration strategies for RS and GBD features were categorized into feature-level integration (FI) and decision-level integration (DI). To be more specific, the FI method integrates the RS and GBD features and classifies urban land use types using the integrated feature sets; the DI method processes RS and GBD independently and then merges the classification results based on decision rules. We also discussed other critical issues, including analysis unit setting, parcel segmentation, parcel labeling of land use types, and data integration. Our findings provide a retrospect of different features from RS and GBD, strategies of RS and GBD integration, and their pros and cons, which could help to define the framework for future urban land use mapping and better support urban planning, urban environment assessment, urban disaster monitoring and urban traffic analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Integrating Remote Sensing and Geospatial Big Data for Land Cover and Land Use Mapping and Monitoring
    See, Linda
    Lesiv, Myroslava
    Schepaschenko, Dmitry
    [J]. LAND, 2024, 13 (06)
  • [2] Mapping urban functional zones with remote sensing and geospatial big data: a systematic review
    Du, Shouhang
    Zhang, Xiuyuan
    Lei, Yichen
    Huang, Xin
    Tu, Wei
    Liu, Bo
    Meng, Qingyan
    Du, Shihong
    [J]. GISCIENCE & REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 61 (01)
  • [3] Decision-Level and Feature-Level Integration of Remote Sensing and Geospatial Big Data for Urban Land Use Mapping
    Yin, Jiadi
    Fu, Ping
    Hamm, Nicholas A. S.
    Li, Zhichao
    You, Nanshan
    He, Yingli
    Cheshmehzangi, Ali
    Dong, Jinwei
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (08)
  • [4] The Review of Land Use/Land Cover Mapping AI Methodology and Application in the Era of Remote Sensing Big Data
    ZHANG Xinchang
    SHI Qian
    SUN Ying
    HUANG Jianfeng
    HE Da
    [J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geoinformation Science., 2024, 7 (03) - 23
  • [5] Classifying urban land use by integrating remote sensing and social media data
    Liu, Xiaoping
    He, Jialv
    Yao, Yao
    Zhang, Jinbao
    Liang, Haolin
    Wang, Huan
    Hong, Ye
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2017, 31 (08) : 1675 - 1696
  • [6] Big Geospatial Data or Geospatial Big Data? A Systematic Narrative Review on the Use of Spatial Data Infrastructures for Big Geospatial Sensing Data in Public Health
    Koh, Keumseok
    Hyder, Ayaz
    Karale, Yogita
    Boulos, Maged N. Kamel
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (13)
  • [7] ASSESSMENT AND MAPPING OF URBAN ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY USING REMOTE SENSING AND GEOSPATIAL DATA
    Danai, Ifanti
    Tsakiri, Maria-Strati
    Mallinis, Giorgos
    Georgiadis, Harris
    Kaimaris, Dimitris
    Patias, Petros
    [J]. SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON REMOTE SENSING AND GEOINFORMATION OF THE ENVIRONMENT (RSCY2018), 2018, 10773
  • [8] Land development, land use, and urban sprawl in Puerto Rico integrating remote sensing and population census data
    Martinuzzi, Sebastian
    Gould, William A.
    Ramos Gonzalez, Olga M.
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2007, 79 (3-4) : 288 - 297
  • [9] Mapping essential urban land use categories (EULUC) using geospatial big data: Progress, challenges, and opportunities
    Chen, Bin
    Xu, Bing
    Gong, Peng
    [J]. BIG EARTH DATA, 2021, 5 (03) : 410 - 441
  • [10] Community scale livability evaluation integrating remote sensing, surface observation and geospatial big data
    Zhang, Yuan
    Li, Qiangzi
    Wang, Hongyan
    Du, Xin
    Huang, Huiping
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2019, 80 : 173 - 186