Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of subcutaneous injection of long-acting human insulin analog glargine, NPH insulin, and ultralente human insulin and continuous subcutaneous infusion of insulin lispro

被引:598
|
作者
Lepore, M [1 ]
Pampanelli, S [1 ]
Fanelli, C [1 ]
Porcellati, F [1 ]
Bartocci, L [1 ]
Di Vincenzo, A [1 ]
Cordoni, C [1 ]
Costa, E [1 ]
Brunetti, P [1 ]
Bolli, GB [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Perugia, Dept Internal Med, I-06126 Perugia, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.2337/diabetes.49.12.2142
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To compare the pharmacokinetics/dynamics of the long-acting insulin analog glargine with NPH, ultralente, and continuous subcutaneous (SC) infusion of insulin lispro (continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion [CSII]), 20 C-peptide-negative type 1 diabetic patients mere studied on four occasions during an isoglycemic 24-h clamp. Patients received SC injection of either 0.3 U/kg glargine or NPH insulin (random sequence, crossover design). On two subsequent occasions, they received either an SC injection of ultralente (0.3 U/kg) or CSII (0.3 U.kg(-1).24 h(-1)) (random sequence, crossover design). After SC insulin injection or CSII, intravenous (IV) insulin was tapered, and glucose was infused to clamp plasma glucose at 130 mg/dl for 24 h. Onset of action (defined as reduction of TV insulin >50%) was earlier with NPH (0.8 +/- 0.2 h), CSII (0.5 +/- 0.1 h), and ultralente (1 +/- 0.2 h) versus glargine (1,5 +/- 0.3 h) (P < 0.05) (mean +/- SE). End of action (defined as an increase in plasma glucose >150 mg/dl) occurred later with glargine (22 +/- 4 h) than with NPH (14 +/- 3 h) (P < 0.05) but was similar with ultralente (20 +/- 6 h). NPH and ultralente exhibited a peak concentration and action (at 4.5 +/- 0.5 and 10.1 +/- 1 h, respectively) followed by waning, whereas glargine had no peak but had a fiat concentration/action profile mimicking CSII. Interindividual variability (calculated as differences in SD of plasma insulin concentrations and glucose infusion rates in different treatments) was lower with glargine than with NPH and ultralente (P < 0.05) but was similar with glargine and CSII (NS). In conclusion, NPH and ultralente are both peak insulins. Duration of action of ultralente is greater, but intersubject variability is also greater than that of NPH. Glargine is a peakless insulin, it lasts nearly 24 h, it has lower intersubject variability than NPH and ultralente, and it closely mimics CSII, the gold standard of basal insulin replacement.
引用
收藏
页码:2142 / 2148
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A comparison of basal insulin delivery - Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus glargine
    King, AB
    Armstrong, D
    DIABETES CARE, 2003, 26 (04) : 1322 - 1322
  • [22] CONTINUOUS SUBCUTANEOUS INSULIN INFUSION - THE INSULIN PUMP
    DENOBEL, E
    NETHERLANDS JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1984, 27 (05): : 173 - 176
  • [23] Insulin aspart for continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion
    Barrio Castellanos, Raquel
    Martin Frias, Maria
    AVANCES EN DIABETOLOGIA, 2012, 28 : 10 - 14
  • [24] Pharmacodynamics (PD) and pharmacokinetics (PK) of subcutaneous insulin and insulin lispro in 3 ethnic groups.
    Wise, SD
    Seah, ES
    Koivisto, V
    DIABETOLOGIA, 1999, 42 : A238 - A238
  • [25] Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion is superior to subcutaneous insulin injection in the desensitisation therapy of insulin allergic diabetic patients
    Yuan, T.
    Li, N. S.
    Zhao, W. G.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2012, 55 : S87 - S88
  • [26] Counterregulatory hormone responses after long-term continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion with lispro insulin
    Tsui, EYL
    Chiasson, JL
    Tildesley, H
    Barnie, A
    Simkins, S
    Strack, T
    Zinman, B
    DIABETES CARE, 1998, 21 (01) : 93 - 96
  • [27] Insulin aspart efficacy and safety compared to buffered regular insulin (Velosulin®) and insulin lispro for continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion
    Bode, B
    Weinstein, R
    Bell, D
    McGill, J
    Nadeau, D
    Raskin, P
    Davidson, J
    Kim, D
    Reinhardt, R
    DIABETES, 2001, 50 : A106 - A106
  • [28] Use of insulin lispro in continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion treatment -: Results of a multicenter trial
    Renner, R
    Pfútzner, A
    Trautmann, M
    Harzer, O
    Sauter, K
    Landgraf, R
    DIABETES CARE, 1999, 22 (05) : 784 - 788
  • [29] Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Human Regular U-500 Insulin Administered via Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Versus Subcutaneous Injection in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes and High-Dose Insulin Requirements
    Ma, Xiaosu
    Benson, Charles T.
    Prescilla, Randy
    Zhang, Shuyu
    Linnebjerg, Helle
    LaBell, Elizabeth S.
    Morrow, Linda A.
    Jackson, Jeffrey A.
    Nguyen, Alex
    Ilag, Liza L.
    Johnson, Jennal L.
    Leishman, Derek
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 16 (02): : 401 - 407
  • [30] Pharmacokinetics following continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion of insulin aspart with or without initial subcutaneous bolus
    Petersen, S. B.
    Kildegaard, J.
    Nielsen, F. S.
    Sondergaard, E.
    Parkner, T.
    Laursen, T.
    Lauritzen, T.
    Skyggebjerg, O.
    Christiansen, J. S.
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2010, 12 (04): : 334 - 340