Provocative Dose of Methacholine Causing a 20% Drop in FEV1 Should Be Used to Interpret Methacholine Challenge Tests with Modern Nebulizers

被引:34
|
作者
Dell, Sharon D. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Bola, Sundeep S. [1 ,3 ]
Foty, Richard G. [1 ,2 ]
Marshall, Laura C. [1 ,2 ]
Nelligan, Kathleen A. [1 ,2 ]
Coates, Allan L. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Sick Children, Div Resp Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Hosp Sick Children, Child Hlth Evaluat Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Pediat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
asthma; bronchial hyperreactivity; methacholine; diagnosis; nebulizers;
D O I
10.1513/AnnalsATS.201409-433OC
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Rationale: The American Thoracic Society guidelines (1999) for methacholine challenge tests (MCTs) using the 2-minute tidal breathing protocol were developed for the now-obsolete English-Wright (EW) nebulizer. In addition, the guideline recommendation to use the provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% drop in FEV1 (PC20) rather than the provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% drop in FEV1 (PD20) for determining the level of bronchial hyperresponsiveness has been challenged. Objectives: To determine if cumulative dose or concentration of methacholine delivered to the airways is the determinant for airway responsiveness and to validate use of the AeroEclipse* II BAN (Aero; Trudell Medical International, London, ON, Canada) nebulizer compared with use of the reference standard EW nebulizer. Methods: Subjects with asthma (10-18 yr old) participated in randomized, controlled cross-over experiments comparing four MCT protocols using standard methacholine concentrations, but varying: (1) methacholine starting concentration (testing for cumulative effect); (2) nebulizer (EW versus Aero); and (3) inhalation time. PD20 was calculated using nebulizer output rate, inhalation time, and preceding doses delivered. ANOVA analyses were used to compare geometric means of PC20 and PD20 between protocols. Results: A total of 32 subjects (17 male) participated. PC20 differed when starting concentration varied (0.46 vs. 0.80 mg/ml; P < 0.0001), whereas PD 20 did not (0.06 vs. 0.08 mg). PC20 differed with the EW versus the Aero nebulzer with 30-second inhalation (1.19 vs. 0.43 mg/ml; P = 0.0006) and the EW versus the Aero nebulizer with 20-second inhalation (1.91 vs. 0.89 mg/ml; P = 0.0027), whereas PD20 did not (0.07 vs. 0.06 mg and 0.11 vs. 0.09 mg, respectively). Conclusions: In MCTs, the cumulative dose (PD20), not the PC20, determines bronchial responsiveness. Modern nebulizers may be used for the test if clinical interpretation is based on PD20.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 363
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [21] Sensitivity and specificity of airway hyperreactivity (AHR) based on methacholine challenge (MCH) tests - Comparison of sGeff with FEV1 and MEF50 as target parameter
    Kraemer, Richard
    Giger, Gabi
    Sigrist, Thomas
    Frey, Martin
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2012, 40
  • [22] Predictive Value of sGaw, FEF25-75, and FEV1 for Development of Asthma after a Negative Methacholine Challenge Test
    Khalid, Imran
    Obeid, Imad
    DiGiovine, Bruno
    Khalid, Usama
    Morris, Zachary Q.
    JOURNAL OF ASTHMA, 2009, 46 (03) : 284 - 290
  • [23] Greater than 12% improvement in FEV1 or 25% improvement in FEF25-75 as predictors of a positive methacholine challenge
    Bshouty, Z
    Rodgers, G
    CHEST, 2005, 128 (04) : 393S - 393S
  • [24] MEASUREMENT OF RESPONSE TO METHACHOLINE INHALATION CHALLENGE IN ASTHMA AND ALLERGIC RHINITIS - PC20 OR PC35FEV1
    PRIETO, L
    MARIN, J
    ALLERGOLOGIA ET IMMUNOPATHOLOGIA, 1990, 18 (05) : 285 - 289
  • [25] The value of small airway function parameters and fractional exhaled nitric oxide for predicting positive methacholine challenge test in asthmatics of different ages with FEV1 ≥ 80% predicted
    Hou, Lili
    Hao, Huijuan
    Huang, Gang
    Liu, Jinkai
    Yu, Li
    Zhu, Lei
    Shen, Huahao
    Zhang, Min
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL ALLERGY, 2021, 11 (01)