Provocative Dose of Methacholine Causing a 20% Drop in FEV1 Should Be Used to Interpret Methacholine Challenge Tests with Modern Nebulizers

被引:34
|
作者
Dell, Sharon D. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Bola, Sundeep S. [1 ,3 ]
Foty, Richard G. [1 ,2 ]
Marshall, Laura C. [1 ,2 ]
Nelligan, Kathleen A. [1 ,2 ]
Coates, Allan L. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Sick Children, Div Resp Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Hosp Sick Children, Child Hlth Evaluat Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Pediat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
asthma; bronchial hyperreactivity; methacholine; diagnosis; nebulizers;
D O I
10.1513/AnnalsATS.201409-433OC
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Rationale: The American Thoracic Society guidelines (1999) for methacholine challenge tests (MCTs) using the 2-minute tidal breathing protocol were developed for the now-obsolete English-Wright (EW) nebulizer. In addition, the guideline recommendation to use the provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% drop in FEV1 (PC20) rather than the provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% drop in FEV1 (PD20) for determining the level of bronchial hyperresponsiveness has been challenged. Objectives: To determine if cumulative dose or concentration of methacholine delivered to the airways is the determinant for airway responsiveness and to validate use of the AeroEclipse* II BAN (Aero; Trudell Medical International, London, ON, Canada) nebulizer compared with use of the reference standard EW nebulizer. Methods: Subjects with asthma (10-18 yr old) participated in randomized, controlled cross-over experiments comparing four MCT protocols using standard methacholine concentrations, but varying: (1) methacholine starting concentration (testing for cumulative effect); (2) nebulizer (EW versus Aero); and (3) inhalation time. PD20 was calculated using nebulizer output rate, inhalation time, and preceding doses delivered. ANOVA analyses were used to compare geometric means of PC20 and PD20 between protocols. Results: A total of 32 subjects (17 male) participated. PC20 differed when starting concentration varied (0.46 vs. 0.80 mg/ml; P < 0.0001), whereas PD 20 did not (0.06 vs. 0.08 mg). PC20 differed with the EW versus the Aero nebulzer with 30-second inhalation (1.19 vs. 0.43 mg/ml; P = 0.0006) and the EW versus the Aero nebulizer with 20-second inhalation (1.91 vs. 0.89 mg/ml; P = 0.0027), whereas PD20 did not (0.07 vs. 0.06 mg and 0.11 vs. 0.09 mg, respectively). Conclusions: In MCTs, the cumulative dose (PD20), not the PC20, determines bronchial responsiveness. Modern nebulizers may be used for the test if clinical interpretation is based on PD20.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 363
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Variability Of Provocative Concentration Of Methacholine Causing A 20% Drop In FEV1 (PC20) Over Time In Asthmatics On A Stable Dose Of Inhaled Corticosteroid
    Sumino, K.
    Sugar, E. A.
    Holbrook, J. T.
    Wise, R. A.
    Castro, M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2011, 183
  • [2] Methacholine Challenge Testing and Baseline FEV1
    Moraes, T. J.
    Wilson, D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 197
  • [3] REFERENCE VALUES OF THE PROVOCATIVE CONCENTRATION OF METHACHOLINE CAUSING A 20-PERCENT FALL IN FEV1 (PC20) IN A NORMAL POPULATION
    MALO, JL
    CARTIER, A
    PINEAU, L
    MARTIN, RR
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1983, 71 (01) : 142 - 142
  • [4] REFERENCE VALUES OF THE PROVOCATIVE CONCENTRATION OF METHACHOLINE CAUSING A 20-PERCENT FALL IN FEV1 (PC20) IN A NORMAL POPULATION
    MALO, JL
    CARTIER, A
    PINEAU, L
    MARTIN, RR
    AMERICAN REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 1983, 127 (04): : 259 - 259
  • [5] Methacholine challenge testing - Safety of low starting FEV1
    Martin, RJ
    Wanger, JS
    Irvin, CG
    Bartelson, BB
    Cherniack, RM
    Drazen, JM
    Israel, E
    Martin, RJ
    Szefler, SJ
    Chinchilli, VM
    Mauger, EA
    Lemanske, RF
    Sorkness, C
    Ford, JG
    McLean, D
    Nochman, S
    Fish, JE
    Peters, SP
    Boushey, HA
    Lazarus, SC
    Fahy, J
    Cherniack, RR
    Hurd, SS
    CHEST, 1997, 112 (01) : 53 - 56
  • [6] Percentage fall in FVC at the provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 in symptomatic asthma and clinical remission during adolescence
    Yoo, Y
    Yu, JH
    Kim, DK
    Koh, YY
    CHEST, 2006, 129 (02) : 272 - 277
  • [7] Vocal biomarkers correlate with FEV1 variations during methacholine challenge
    Paoletti, Giovanni
    Costanzo, Giovanni
    Merigo, Morena
    Puggioni, Francesca
    Ferri, Sebastian
    Messina, Maria Rita
    Cordella, Fulvio
    Ranieri, Giuseppe
    Arienzo, Arianna
    Savevski, Victor
    Canonica, Giorgio Walter
    de Brito Martins, Ayana
    Heffler, Enrico
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL ALLERGY, 2025, 15 (04)
  • [8] Using FEV1/FVC to Predict Outcome of Methacholine Challenge Testing
    Wee, W.
    Wilson, D.
    Moraes, T. J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 199
  • [9] THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE RELATIVE REDUCTION OF FVC AND FEV1 AFTER METHACHOLINE CHALLENGE
    GROTH, S
    SIMONSSON, BG
    KABIRAJ, M
    BULOW, K
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY DISEASES, 1983, 64 : 409 - 412
  • [10] Methacholine Challenge Testing: Comparison of FEV1 and Airway Resistance Parameters
    Urbankowski, Tomasz
    Przybylowski, Tadeusz
    RESPIRATORY CARE, 2021, 66 (03) : 449 - 459