How do spine instrumentation parameters influence the 3D correction of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? A patient-specific biomechanical study

被引:7
|
作者
La Barbera, Luigi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Larson, A. Noelle [4 ]
Aubin, Carl-Eric [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Polytech Montreal, Dept Mech Engn, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] St Justine Univ Hosp Ctr, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Politecn Milan, Dept Chem Mat & Chem Engn, Milan, Italy
[4] Mayo Clin, Dept Orthoped Surg, Rochester, MN USA
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Deformity correction; Screw pattern; Implant density; Rod contour; Spine biomechanics; Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS); CORRECTION OBJECTIVES; IMPLANT DISTRIBUTION; SURGICAL-CORRECTION; ROD SHAPE; LENKE; STIFFNESS; DENSITY; FUSION; SCREWS;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105346
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Background: Patient-specific models promises to support the surgical decision-making process, particularly in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The present computational biomechanical study investigates how specific instrumentation parameters impact 3D deformity correction in thoracic scoliosis. Methods: 1080 instrumentation simulations of a representative patient were run. The independent instrumentation parameters were: screw pattern, upper and lower instrumented vertebrae, rod curvature and rod stiffness. ANOVA and correlation analyses analyzed how the instrumentation parameters influenced the 3D correction. Findings: Coronal plane correction was affected by the lower instrumented vertebra and rod stiffness (explaining 84% and 11%, respectively, of its overall variance). The sagittal profile was controlled by rod curvature and the upper vertebra (56% and 36%). The transverse plane vertebral rotation was influenced by lower, upper instrumented vertebra and screw pattern (35%, 32% and 19%). The Cobb angle correction was strongly correlated with the number of fused vertebrae, particularly when grouped by the upper instrumented vertebra (r = -0.91) and rod stiffness (r = -0.73). Thoracic kyphosis was strongly correlated with the number of fused vertebrae grouped by rod curvature (r = 0.84). Apical vertebral rotation was moderately correlated with the number of fused vertebrae grouped by upper/lower instrumented vertebra (r = 0.55/0.58), although variations were minimal. Interpretation: Instrumenting the last vertebra touching the central sacral vertical line improves 3D correction. A trade-off between a more cranial vs. caudal upper instrumented vertebra, respectively beneficial for coronal/sagittal vs. transverse plane correction, is required. High rod stiffness, differential rod contouring, and screw pattern were effective for coronal correction, thoracic kyphosis, and axial vertebral derotation, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Characterizing the differences between the 2D and 3D measurements of spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
    Pasha, Saba
    Cahill, Patrick J.
    Dormans, John P.
    Flynn, John M.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 25 (10) : 3137 - 3145
  • [32] Characterizing the differences between the 2D and 3D measurements of spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
    Saba Pasha
    Patrick J. Cahill
    John P. Dormans
    John M. Flynn
    European Spine Journal, 2016, 25 : 3137 - 3145
  • [33] The 3D Sagittal Profile of Thoracic Versus Lumbar Major Curves in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
    Newton, Peter O.
    Osborn, Emily J.
    Bastrom, Tracey P.
    Doan, Joshua D.
    Reighard, Fredrick G.
    SPINE DEFORMITY, 2019, 7 (01) : 60 - 65
  • [34] Surgical outcome differences between the 3D subtypes of right thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
    Saba Pasha
    Keith Baldwin
    European Spine Journal, 2019, 28 : 3076 - 3084
  • [35] Surgical outcome differences between the 3D subtypes of right thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
    Pasha, Saba
    Baldwin, Keith
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2019, 28 (12) : 3076 - 3084
  • [36] The 3D Sagittal Profile of Thoracic Versus Lumbar Major Curves in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
    Peter O. Newton
    Emily J. Osborn
    Tracey P. Bastrom
    Joshua D. Doan
    Fredrick G. Reighard
    Spine Deformity, 2019, 7 : 60 - 65
  • [37] Restoration of thoracic kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with patient-specific rods: did the preoperative plan match postoperative sagittal alignment?
    Thomas, Evelyn S.
    Boyer, Noah
    Meyers, Andrew
    Aziz, Hossein
    Aminian, Afshin
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 32 (01) : 190 - 201
  • [38] Restoration of thoracic kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with patient-specific rods: did the preoperative plan match postoperative sagittal alignment?
    Evelyn S. Thomas
    Noah Boyer
    Andrew Meyers
    Hossein Aziz
    Afshin Aminian
    European Spine Journal, 2023, 32 : 190 - 201
  • [39] Biomechanical study of new treatment approaches for 3D orthotic correction of scoliosis
    Gignac, D
    Aubin, CE
    Dansereau, J
    Poulin, F
    Labelle, H
    ANNALES DE CHIRURGIE, 1998, 52 (08): : 795 - 800
  • [40] Basal osteotomy of the first metacarpal using patient-specific guides and instrumentation: biomechanical and 3D CT-based analysis
    Nuesch, Clea
    Schweizer, Andreas
    Weber, Andreas
    Reissner, Lisa
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2024, 144 (01) : 551 - 558