Removing Malachite Green and Leucomalachite Green From Freshwater and Seawater With Four Water Treatment Agents

被引:7
|
作者
Lin, Yu-Ru [1 ]
Hu, Yeh-Fang [1 ]
Huang, Chih-Yang [1 ]
Huang, Huai-Ting [1 ]
Liao, Zhen-Hao [1 ]
Lee, An-Ting [1 ]
Wu, Yu-Sheng [2 ]
Nan, Fan-Hua [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Ocean Univ, Dept Aquaculture, Keelung City, Taiwan
[2] Natl Pingtung Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Aquaculture, Neipu Township, Pingtung Cty, Taiwan
关键词
malachite green (MG); leucomalachite green (LMG); adsorbent; chlorine dioxide (ClO2); liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS; MS); HUMIC-ACID; RAINBOW-TROUT; LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY; CHLORINE DIOXIDE; AQUEOUS-SOLUTION; WASTE-WATER; PESTICIDE-RESIDUES; ADSORPTION; DYE; BINDING;
D O I
10.3389/fenvs.2022.906886
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Malachite green (MG) residue in aquatic environments can adversely affect food chains. To solve this problem, many adsorbents have been developed to remove MG from aqueous solutions. These adsorbents exhibit benefits in different aspects such as low cost, nontoxicity, and environment friendliness. Zeolite, oyster shell powder (OSP), humic acid (HA), and Chloride dioxide (ClO2) are widely used agents for water purification, indicating their potential to remove MG from both freshwater and seawater. Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry was performed as a valid analytical method for measuring MG and its metabolite leucomalachite green (LMG). The analysis examined linearity, specificity, accuracy, precision, and limit of quantification. We found that three agents-zeolite, OSP, and HA-have high affinity for MG and LMG in both freshwater and seawater because of their physicochemical properties; ClO2 exhibited even greater efficiency for MG and LMG degradation due to its oxidation capacity. The MG removal efficiency of zeolite, OSP and HA in freshwater was 100%, 87.52%, and 100%, respectively. In the MG-containing seawater, the removal efficiency of zeolite, OSP and HA was 95.24%, 6.57%, and 89.36%, respectively. The LMG removal efficiency of zeolite, OSP and HA in freshwater was 100%, 53.56%, and 100%, while in seawater, the LMG removal efficiency of zeolite, OSP and HA was 100%, 62.70%, and 84.65%, respectively. ClO2 treatments in both freshwater and seawater expressed 100% removal efficiency. The adsorption capacity of three water agents in MG-containing freshwater decreased in the order: zeolite = HA > OSP; in MG-containing seawater: zeolite > HA > OSP. Whereas the adsorption capacity of three water agents in LMG-containing freshwater decreased in the order: zeolite = HA > OSP; in LMG-containing seawater: zeolite > HA > OSP. In this study, four water treatment agents are reported to remove MG and LMG from freshwater and seawater, indicating their potential for reducing the amount of hazardous MG and LMG residue in aquatic environments.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Simultaneous and rapid determination of malachite green and leucomalachite green by a label-free colorimetric aptasensor
    Wu Wenwei
    Yi, Wang
    Liu Kexin
    Li Tiansong
    Yang Yongjie
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY, 2020, 38 (11) : 1332 - 1339
  • [32] Determination of malachite green and leucomalachite green in carp muscle by liquid chromatography with visible and fluorescence detection
    Mitrowska, K
    Posyniak, A
    Zmudzki, J
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2005, 1089 (1-2) : 187 - 192
  • [33] Preparation and Application of Polymerized High Internal Phase Emulsion Monoliths for the Preconcentration and Determination of Malachite Green and Leucomalachite Green in Water Samples
    Jiang, Li-Ping
    Li, Na
    Liu, Lin-Qi
    Zheng, Xian
    Du, Fu-You
    Ruan, Gui-Hua
    JOURNAL OF ANALYSIS AND TESTING, 2020, 4 (04) : 264 - 272
  • [34] Preparation and Application of Polymerized High Internal Phase Emulsion Monoliths for the Preconcentration and Determination of Malachite Green and Leucomalachite Green in Water Samples
    Li-Ping Jiang
    Na Li
    Lin-Qi Liu
    Xian Zheng
    Fu-You Du
    Gui-Hua Ruan
    Journal of Analysis and Testing, 2020, 4 : 264 - 272
  • [35] Determination of malachite green and leucomalachite green residues in water using liquid chromatography with visible and fluorescence detection and confirmation by tandem mass spectrometry
    Mitrowska, Kamila
    Posyniak, Andrzej
    Zmudzki, Jan
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2008, 1207 (1-2) : 94 - 100
  • [36] Carcinogenicity of gentian violet, leucogentian violet, malachite green, leucomalachite green, and CI Direct Blue 218
    Le Curieux, Frank
    Gohlke, Julia M.
    Pronk, Anjoeka
    Andersen, Wendy C.
    Chen, Guosheng
    Fang, Jia-Long
    Mitrowska, Kamila
    Sanders, Pascal J. J.
    Sun, Meng
    Umbuzeiro, Gisela A.
    Umemura, Takashi
    Benbrahim-Tallaa, Lamia
    El Ghissassi, Fatiha
    Grosse, Yann
    Gwinn, William
    Middleton, Daniel
    Suonio, Eero
    Chung, Felicia
    Miranda-Filho, Adalberto
    Mattock, Heidi
    Guyton, Kathryn Z.
    Schubauer-Berigan, Mary K.
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2021, 22 (05): : 585 - 586
  • [37] SIMULTANEOUS DETERMINATION OF MALACHITE GREEN AND ITS METABOLITE LEUCOMALACHITE GREEN IN EEL PLASMA USING POSTCOLUMN OXIDATION
    HAJEE, CAJ
    HAAGSMA, N
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY B-ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN THE BIOMEDICAL AND LIFE SCIENCES, 1995, 669 (02): : 219 - 227
  • [38] Liquid chromatographic determination of malachite green and leucomalachite green (LMG) residues in salmon with in situ LMG oxidation
    Andersen, WC
    Roybal, JE
    Turnipseed, SB
    JOURNAL OF AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 88 (05) : 1292 - 1298
  • [39] Effects of malachite green and its major metabolite, leucomalachite green, in micromass cultures of rat embryonic cells
    Minta, Maria
    Wilk-Zasadna, Iwona
    BULLETIN OF THE VETERINARY INSTITUTE IN PULAWY, 2007, 51 (04) : 695 - 700
  • [40] Determination of malachite green and leucomalachite green in a variety of aquacultured products by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry detection
    van de Riet, JM
    Murphy, CJ
    Pearce, JN
    Potter, RA
    Burns, BG
    JOURNAL OF AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 88 (03) : 744 - 749