Software Effort Estimation Using ISBSG Dataset: Multiple Case Studies

被引:0
|
作者
Unlu, Huseyin [1 ]
Yalcin, Ali Gorkem [1 ]
Ozturk, Dilek [1 ]
Akkaya, Guliz [1 ]
Kalecik, Mert [1 ]
Ekici, Nazim Umut [1 ]
Orhan, Oguzhan [1 ]
Ciftci, Okan [1 ]
Yumlu, Selen [1 ]
Demirors, Onur [1 ]
机构
[1] Izmir Yuksek Teknol Enstitusu, Bilgisayar Muhendisligi Bolumu, Izmir, Turkey
关键词
software effort estimation; software size measurement; COSMIC; ISO; 19761; ISBSG; case study;
D O I
10.1109/UYMS54260.2021.9659655
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Effort estimation is one of the base activities in software project planning. There are two base inputs needed for the effort estimation: software size and effort data. The size of the software can be measured in different stages of the project. However, there are known problems regarding effort data collection in the industry. In these circumstances, effort estimation can be difficult in organizations. International Software Benchmarking Standards Group (ISBSG) dataset includes many projects including the size and effort data provided by different organizations. This dataset can be used in organizations for effort estimation. In this study, we performed case studies with graduate students to explore if the ISBSG dataset is beneficial for the effort estimation in their organizations. Firstly, students measured the size of a project from their organizations using the COSMIC Functional Size Measurement Method. Then, they formed an effort estimation model using ISBSG data and predicted the effort for their project. Our study shows the applicability of using ISBSG for effort estimation when there is no effort data in an organization.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 112
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Software Effort Estimation with Use Case Points using Ensemble Machine Learning Models
    Marapelli, Bhaskar
    Carie, Anil
    Islam, Sardar M. N.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL, COMPUTER AND ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES (ICECET 2021), 2021, : 333 - 338
  • [32] Software effort estimation using machine learning methods
    Baskeles, Bilge
    Turhan, Burak
    Bener, Ayse
    [J]. 2007 22ND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AND INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2007, : 208 - 213
  • [33] Effort Estimation in Agile Software Development Using Autoencoders
    Rodriguez Sanchez, Eduardo
    Vazquez Santacruz, Eduardo
    Cervantes Maceda, Humberto
    [J]. 2023 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT, CIMPS 2023, 2023, : 1 - 7
  • [34] Software Effort Estimation Using Data Mining Techniques
    Benala, Tirimula Rao
    Mall, Rajib
    Srikavya, P.
    HariPriya, M. Vani
    [J]. ICT AND CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 48TH ANNUAL CONVENTION OF COMPUTER SOCIETY OF INDIA - VOL I, 2014, 248 : 85 - 92
  • [35] Software Effort Estimation using Machine Learning Technique
    Rahman, Mizanur
    Roy, Partha Protim
    Ali, Mohammad
    Goncalves, Teresa
    Sarwar, Hasan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2023, 14 (04) : 822 - 827
  • [36] SOFTWARE EFFORT ESTIMATION USING MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS
    Lavingia, Kruti
    Patel, Raj
    Patel, Vivek
    Lavingia, Ami
    [J]. SCALABLE COMPUTING-PRACTICE AND EXPERIENCE, 2024, 25 (02): : 1276 - 1285
  • [37] An optimized case-based software project effort estimation using genetic algorithm
    Hameed, Shaima
    Elsheikh, Yousef
    Azzeh, Mohammad
    [J]. INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 153
  • [38] Developing and using checklists to improve software effort estimation: A multi-case study
    Usman, Muhammad
    Petersen, Kai
    Borstler, Jurgen
    Neto, Pedro Santos
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2018, 146 : 286 - 309
  • [39] Two case studies in measuring software maintenance effort
    Niessink, F
    van Vliet, P
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE, PROCEEDINGS, 1998, : 76 - 85
  • [40] Effort estimation in agile software development: A method and a case study
    Machado, F
    Joyanes, L
    [J]. SERP '05: Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Software Engineering Research and Practice, Vols 1 and 2, 2005, : 470 - 475