Optimal sensor placement for structural response estimation

被引:5
|
作者
Chen Wei [1 ,2 ]
Zhao Wen-guang [1 ,2 ]
Zhu Hong-ping [1 ,2 ]
Chen Jun-feng [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Civil Engn & Mech, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Hubei Key Lab Control Struct, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
关键词
estimation error minimization (EEM); system equivalent reduction-expansion process (SEREP); optimal sensor placement (OSP); root mean square error (RMSE); ORBIT MODAL IDENTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1007/s11771-014-2387-4
中图分类号
TF [冶金工业];
学科分类号
0806 ;
摘要
A methodology, termed estimation error minimization (EEM) method, was proposed to determine the optimal number and locations of sensors so as to better estimate the vibration response of the entire structure. Utilizing the limited sensor measurements, the entire structure response can be estimated based on the system equivalent reduction-expansion process (SEREP) method. In order to compare the capability of capturing the structural vibration response with other optimal sensor placement (OSP) methods, the effective independence (EI) method, modal kinetic energy (MKE) method and modal assurance criterion (MAC) method, were also investigated. A statistical criterion, root mean square error (RMSE), was employed to assess the magnitude of the estimation error between the real response and the estimated response. For investigating the effectiveness and accuracy of the above OSP methods, a 31-bar truss structure is introduced as a simulation example. The analysis results show that both the maximum and mean of the RMSE value obtained from the EEM method are smaller than those from other OSP methods, which indicates that the optimal sensor configuration obtained from the EEM method can provide a more accurate estimation of the entire structure response compared with the EI, MKE and MAC methods.
引用
收藏
页码:3993 / 4001
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimal sensor placement for structural response estimation
    Wei Chen
    Wen-guang Zhao
    Hong-ping Zhu
    Jun-feng Chen
    [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2014, 21 : 3993 - 4001
  • [2] Optimal sensor placement for structural response estimation
    陈玮
    赵文光
    朱宏平
    陈骏锋
    [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2014, 21 (10) : 3993 - 4001
  • [3] Optimal Sensor Placement for Response Reconstruction in Structural Dynamics
    Papadimitriou, Costas
    [J]. MODEL VALIDATION AND UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION, VOL 3, 2020, : 205 - 210
  • [4] Optimal sensor placement for uncertain inverse problem of structural parameter estimation
    Liu, Jie
    Ouyang, Heng
    Han, Xu
    Liu, Guirong
    [J]. MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2021, 160
  • [5] Optimal sensor placement for parameter estimation of bridges
    Eskew, Edward
    Jang, Shinae
    [J]. HEALTH MONITORING OF STRUCTURAL AND BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS 2017, 2017, 10170
  • [6] Optimal sensor placement in structural control systems
    Lee, DG
    He, G
    Lee, W
    Lee, G
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, PT 1-3, 2004, 270-273 : 1454 - 1459
  • [7] Optimal sensor placement for structural parameter identification
    Corrado Chisari
    Lorenzo Macorini
    Claudio Amadio
    Bassam A. Izzuddin
    [J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2017, 55 : 647 - 662
  • [8] Optimal sensor placement for structural parameter identification
    Chisari, Corrado
    Macorini, Lorenzo
    Amadio, Claudio
    Izzuddin, Bassam A.
    [J]. STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2017, 55 (02) : 647 - 662
  • [9] Optimal Sensor Placement for Substructural Response Reconstruction
    Ye, Q.
    Law, S. S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED MECHANICS-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2014, 81 (06):
  • [10] Sensor Placement for Optimal Estimation in Power Distribution Grids
    Fusco, Francesco
    Villumsen, Jonas C.
    [J]. 2015 IEEE POWER & ENERGY SOCIETY INNOVATIVE SMART GRID TECHNOLOGIES CONFERENCE (ISGT), 2015,