Sublingual Sufentanil versus Standard-of-Care (Patient-Controlled Analgesia with Epidural Ropivacaine/Sufentanil or Intravenous Morphine) for Postoperative Pain Following Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Randomized Trial

被引:2
|
作者
Groen, Jesse Vincent [1 ]
Boon, S. C. [2 ]
Minderhoud, M. W. [2 ]
Bonsing, Bert A. [1 ]
Martini, C. H. [2 ]
Putter, H. [3 ]
Vahrnneijer, A. L. [1 ]
van Velzen, Monique [2 ]
Vuijk, J. [2 ]
Mieoe, J. S. D. [1 ]
Dahan, A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Dept Surg, Med Ctr, Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Med Ctr, Albinusdreef 2, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Leiden Univ, Dept Med Stat, Med Ctr, Leiden, Netherlands
来源
JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH | 2022年 / 15卷
关键词
postoperative pain; pancreatoduodenectomy; sufentanil; epidural analgesia; morphine; TABLET SYSTEM; PANCREATIC SURGERY; MANAGEMENT; 1ST;
D O I
10.2147/JPR.S363545
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The optimal treatment strategy for postoperative pain following pancreatoduodenectomy remains unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate whether sublingual sufentanil tablet (SST) is a non-inferior analgesic compared to our standard-of-care (patient-controlled epidural analgesia [PCEA] or PCA morphine) in the treatment of pain following pancreatoduodenectomy. Methods: This was a pragmatic, strategy, open-label, non-inferiority, parallel group, randomized (1:1) trial. The primary outcome was an overall mean pain score (Numerical Rating Scale: 0-10) on postoperative days 1 to 3 combined. The non-inferiority margin was - 1.5 since this difference was considered clinically relevant. Results: Between October 2018 and July 2021, 190 patients were assessed for eligibility and 36 patients were included in the final analysis: 17 patients were randomized to SST and 19 patients to standard-of-care. Early treatment failure in the SST group occurred in 2 patients (12%) due to inability to operate the SST system and in 2 patients (12%) due to severe nausea despite antiemetics. Early treatment failure in the standard-of-care group occurred in 2 patients (11%) due to preoperative PCEA placement failure and in 1 patient (5%) due to hemodynamic instability caused by PCEA. The mean difference in pain score on postoperative day 1 to 3 was - 0.10 (95% CI -0.72-0.52), and therefore the non-inferiority of SST compared to standard-of-care was demonstrated. The mean pain score, number of patients reporting unacceptable pain (pain score >4), Overall Benefit of Analgesia Score, and patient satisfaction per postoperative day, perioperative hemodynamics and postoperative outcomes did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusion: This first randomized study investigating the use of SST in 36 patients following pancreatoduodenectomy showed that SST is non-inferior compared to our standard-of-care in the treatment of pain on postoperative days 1 to 3. Future research is needed to confirm that these are applicable to other settings.
引用
收藏
页码:1775 / 1786
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of continuous epidural infusion of ropivacaine and sufentanil with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after total hip replacement
    Kampe, S
    Randebrock, G
    Kiencke, P
    Hünseler, U
    Cranfield, K
    König, DP
    Diefenbach, C
    ANAESTHESIA, 2001, 56 (12) : 1189 - 1193
  • [22] Lung function after lobectomy: A randomized, doubled-blinded trial comparing thoracic epidural ropivacaine/sufentanil and intraveneous morphine for patient-controlled analgesia
    Bauer, Christian
    Hentz, Jean-Gustave
    Ducrocq, Xavier
    Nicolas, Meyer
    Oswald-Mammosser, Monique
    Steib, Annick
    Dupeyron, Jean-Pierre
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2007, 105 (01): : 238 - 244
  • [23] Patient-controlled sublingual sufentanil tablet system versus intravenous opioid analgesia for postoperative pain management after lumbar spinal fusion surgery
    Lindemann, Chris
    Strube, Patrick
    Fisahn, Christian
    Sgroi, Mirco
    Dornacher, Daniel
    Zippelius, Timo
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 32 (01) : 321 - 328
  • [24] What concentration of sufentanil should be combined with ropivacaine 0.2% wt/vol for postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia?
    Brodner, G
    Mertes, N
    Van Aken, H
    Möllhoff, T
    Zahl, M
    Wirtz, S
    Marcus, MAE
    Buerkle, H
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2000, 90 (03): : 649 - 657
  • [25] Efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine-ropivacaine versus sufentanil-ropivacaine for epidural labor analgesia: a randomized controlled trial
    Fan, Mei
    Li, Juan
    Cao, Rong
    Hu, Lili
    Lu, Sunshan
    ANNALS OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (04) : 1410 - 1420
  • [26] Randomized Controlled Trial of Epidural versus Patient-controlled Intravenous Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Control after Laparoscopic Gastrectomy
    Kikuchi, Satoru
    Kuroda, Shinji
    Nishizaki, Masahiko
    Matsusaki, Takashi
    Mitsuhashi, Toshiharu
    Kuwada, Kazuya
    Kagawa, Shunsuke
    Morimatsu, Hiroshi
    Fujiwara, Toshiyoshi
    ACTA MEDICA OKAYAMA, 2018, 72 (01) : 95 - 98
  • [27] A randomized trial of patient-controlled epidural versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia during labor
    Sharma, SK
    Leveno, KJ
    Messick, G
    Alexander, JM
    Sidawi, JE
    Wiley, J
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, : U8 - U8
  • [28] A randomized, double-blinded comparison of intrathecal morphine, sufentanil and their combination versus IV morphine patient-controlled analgesia for postthoracotomy pain
    Liu, N
    Kuhlman, G
    Dalibon, N
    Moutafis, M
    Levron, JC
    Fischler, M
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2001, 92 (01): : 31 - 36
  • [29] LABOR PAIN RELIEF USING BUPIVACAINE AND SUFENTANIL - PATIENT-CONTROLLED EPIDURAL ANALGESIA VERSUS INTERMITTENT INJECTIONS
    VANDERMEULEN, EP
    VANAKEN, H
    VERTOMMEN, JD
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1995, 59 : S47 - S54
  • [30] Lung function after lobectomy: A randomized, double-blinded trial comparing thoracic epidural ropivacaine/sufentanil and intravenous morphine for patient-controlled analgesia (vol 105, pg 238, 2007)
    Bauer, C.
    Hentz, J-G
    Ducrocq, X.
    Nicolas, M.
    Oswald-Mammosser, M.
    Steib, A.
    Dupeyron, J-P
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2008, 106 (04): : 1283 - 1283