Sublingual Sufentanil versus Standard-of-Care (Patient-Controlled Analgesia with Epidural Ropivacaine/Sufentanil or Intravenous Morphine) for Postoperative Pain Following Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Randomized Trial

被引:2
|
作者
Groen, Jesse Vincent [1 ]
Boon, S. C. [2 ]
Minderhoud, M. W. [2 ]
Bonsing, Bert A. [1 ]
Martini, C. H. [2 ]
Putter, H. [3 ]
Vahrnneijer, A. L. [1 ]
van Velzen, Monique [2 ]
Vuijk, J. [2 ]
Mieoe, J. S. D. [1 ]
Dahan, A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Dept Surg, Med Ctr, Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Med Ctr, Albinusdreef 2, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Leiden Univ, Dept Med Stat, Med Ctr, Leiden, Netherlands
来源
JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH | 2022年 / 15卷
关键词
postoperative pain; pancreatoduodenectomy; sufentanil; epidural analgesia; morphine; TABLET SYSTEM; PANCREATIC SURGERY; MANAGEMENT; 1ST;
D O I
10.2147/JPR.S363545
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The optimal treatment strategy for postoperative pain following pancreatoduodenectomy remains unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate whether sublingual sufentanil tablet (SST) is a non-inferior analgesic compared to our standard-of-care (patient-controlled epidural analgesia [PCEA] or PCA morphine) in the treatment of pain following pancreatoduodenectomy. Methods: This was a pragmatic, strategy, open-label, non-inferiority, parallel group, randomized (1:1) trial. The primary outcome was an overall mean pain score (Numerical Rating Scale: 0-10) on postoperative days 1 to 3 combined. The non-inferiority margin was - 1.5 since this difference was considered clinically relevant. Results: Between October 2018 and July 2021, 190 patients were assessed for eligibility and 36 patients were included in the final analysis: 17 patients were randomized to SST and 19 patients to standard-of-care. Early treatment failure in the SST group occurred in 2 patients (12%) due to inability to operate the SST system and in 2 patients (12%) due to severe nausea despite antiemetics. Early treatment failure in the standard-of-care group occurred in 2 patients (11%) due to preoperative PCEA placement failure and in 1 patient (5%) due to hemodynamic instability caused by PCEA. The mean difference in pain score on postoperative day 1 to 3 was - 0.10 (95% CI -0.72-0.52), and therefore the non-inferiority of SST compared to standard-of-care was demonstrated. The mean pain score, number of patients reporting unacceptable pain (pain score >4), Overall Benefit of Analgesia Score, and patient satisfaction per postoperative day, perioperative hemodynamics and postoperative outcomes did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusion: This first randomized study investigating the use of SST in 36 patients following pancreatoduodenectomy showed that SST is non-inferior compared to our standard-of-care in the treatment of pain on postoperative days 1 to 3. Future research is needed to confirm that these are applicable to other settings.
引用
收藏
页码:1775 / 1786
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Epidural versus intravenous sufentanil by patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain
    Menigaux, C
    Dupont, X
    Alfonsi, P
    Chauvin, M
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1996, 85 (3A) : A762 - A762
  • [2] PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA AFTER CESAREAN DELIVERY - EPIDURAL SUFENTANIL VERSUS INTRAVENOUS MORPHINE
    GRASS, JA
    ZUCKERMAN, RL
    SAKIMA, NT
    HARRIS, AP
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA, 1994, 19 (02) : 90 - 97
  • [3] Intravenous butorphanol as an adjunct to patient-controlled epidural analgesia with ropivacaine and sufentanil in labor: a randomized controlled study
    Zhou, Ting
    Nong, FengYuan
    Wang, MengXia
    Liang, ZhaoJia
    Li, YaLan
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 49 (03):
  • [4] Sufentanil Sublingual Tablet System vs. Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia with Morphine for Postoperative Pain Control: A Randomized, Active-Comparator Trial
    Melson, Timothy I.
    Boyer, David L.
    Minkowitz, Harold S.
    Turan, Alparslan
    Chiang, Yu-Kun
    Evashenk, Mark A.
    Palmer, Pamela P.
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2014, 14 (08) : 679 - 688
  • [5] PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA WITH SUFENTANIL - A COMPARISON OF EPIDURAL VERSUS INTRAVENOUS ADMINISTRATION
    SINATRA, RS
    SEVARINO, FB
    PAIGE, D
    DOMBROWSKI, J
    CHUNG, J
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1993, 79 (3A) : A838 - A838
  • [6] Extradural versus iv sufentanil by patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain
    Menigaux, C
    Maitrepierre, J
    Levron, JC
    Assoune, P
    Chauvin, M
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1996, 76 : A393 - A393
  • [7] A randomised comparison of intravenous remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia with epidural ropivacaine/sufentanil during labour
    Douma, M. R.
    Middeldorp, J. M.
    Verwey, R. A.
    Dahan, A.
    Stienstrad, R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2011, 20 (02) : 118 - 123
  • [8] Comparison of bupivacaine, ropivacaine and levobupivacaine with sufentanil for patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor: a randomized clinical trial
    Wang Li-zhong
    Chang Xiang-yang
    Liu Xia
    Hu Xiao-xia
    Tang Bei-lei
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 123 (02) : 178 - 183
  • [9] Randomized controlled trial of patient-controlled epidural analgesia after orthopaedic surgery with sufentanil and ropivacaine 0.165% or levobupivacaine 0.125%
    Smet, I.
    Vlaminck, E.
    Vercauteren, M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2008, 100 (01) : 99 - 103
  • [10] A multicentre trial comparing different concentrations of ropivacaine plus sufentanil with bupivacaine plus sufentanil for patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labour
    Gogarten, W
    Van de Velde, M
    Soetens, F
    Van Aken, H
    Brodner, G
    Gramke, HF
    Soetens, M
    Marcus, MAE
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2004, 21 (01) : 38 - 45