Statistical Analysis on the Cost and Duration of Public Building Projects

被引:31
|
作者
Abu Hammad, Ayman A. [1 ]
Ali, Souma M. Alhaj [2 ]
Sweis, Ghaleb J. [3 ]
Sweis, Rateb J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Appl Sci Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Coll Engn, Amman 11931, Jordan
[2] Hashemite Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Zarqa 13115, Jordan
[3] Univ Jordan, Dept Civil Engn, Coll Engn, Amman 11942, Jordan
[4] Univ Jordan, Coll Business Adm, Amman 11942, Jordan
关键词
Construction costs; Construction management; Project delivery; Regression analysis; Regression models; CONSTRUCTION; DELAY;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2010)26:2(105)
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
A probabilistic model is proposed to predict the risk effects on time and cost of public building projects. The research goal is to utilize a real history data in estimating project cost and duration. The model results can be used to adjust floats and budgets of the planning schedule before project commencement. Statistical regression models and sample tests are developed using real data of 113 public projects. The model outputs can be used by project managers in the planning phase to validate the schedule critical path time and project budget. The comparison of means analysis for project cost and time performance indicated that the sample projects tend to finish over budget and almost on schedule. Regression models were developed to model project cost and time. The regression analysis showed that the project budgeted cost and planned project duration provide a good basis for estimating the cost and duration. The regression model results were validated by estimating the prediction error in percent and through conducting out-of-sample tests. In conclusion, the models were validated at a probability of 95%, at which the proposed models predict the project cost and duration at an error margin of 0.035% of the actual cost and time.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 112
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Green Building Construction Projects in Singapore: Cost Premiums and Cost Performance
    Hwang, Bon-Gang
    Zhu, Lei
    Wang, Yinglin
    Cheong, Xinyi
    [J]. PROJECT MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2017, 48 (04) : 67 - 79
  • [42] Survival analysis for the duration of software projects
    Sentas, P
    Angelis, L
    [J]. 2005 11TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SOFTWARE METRICS (METRICS), 2005, : 24 - 33
  • [43] Cost-based analysis of quality in developing countries: a case study of building projects
    Kazaz, A
    Birgonul, MT
    Ulubeyli, S
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 40 (10) : 1356 - 1365
  • [44] Statistical Characteristics of Cost Contingency in Water Infrastructure Projects
    Baccarini, David
    Love, Peter E. D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 140 (03)
  • [45] Knowledge based decision support tool for duration and cost overrun analysis of highway construction projects
    Arun, C.
    Rao, B.N.
    [J]. Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India): Civil Engineering Division, 2007, 88 (AUG.): : 27 - 33
  • [46] Critical cost factors of building construction projects in Malaysia
    Toh, Tien-Choon
    Ting, Connie
    Ali, Kherun-Nita
    Aliagha, Godwin-Uche
    Munir, Omar
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ASIA PACIFIC BUSINESS INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2012, 57 : 360 - 367
  • [47] Comparing contributors to time and cost performance in building projects
    Dissanayaka, SM
    Kumaraswamy, MM
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 1999, 34 (01) : 31 - 42
  • [48] Causative Factors of Cost Overrun in Building Projects of Pakistan
    Sohu, Samiullah
    Abdullah, Abd Halid
    Nagapan, Sasitharan
    Memon, Nafees Ahmed
    Yunus, Riduan
    Hasmori, Muhammad Fikri
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED ENGINEERING, 2018, 10 (09): : 122 - 126
  • [49] Time-cost model for building projects in Nigeria
    Ogunsemi, D. R.
    Jagboro, G. O.
    [J]. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2006, 24 (03) : 253 - 258
  • [50] Assessment of rework cost of selected building projects in Nigeria
    Oke, Ayodeji
    Ugoje, O.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITY & RELIABILITY MANAGEMENT, 2013, 30 (07) : 799 - 810