Gleason score vs Gleason predominant grade 4/5 as predictors of progression following radical prostatectomy

被引：0
|
作者：
Guimaraes, MS [1 ]
Billis, A [1 ]
Magna, LA [1 ]
Quintal, MM [1 ]
Ruano, T [1 ]
机构：
[1] UNICAMP, Sch Med, Campinas, SP, Brazil
来源：
MODERN PATHOLOGY | 2005年 / 18卷
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号：
100104 ;
摘要：
657
引用
收藏
页码：143A / 143A
页数：1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Predicting radical prostatectomy outcome: Cell cycle progression (CCP) score compared with primary Gleason grade among men with clinical Gleason less than 7 who are upgraded to Gleason 7
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Freedland, Stephen J.
    Schlomm, Thorsten
    Reid, Julia E.
    Stone, Steven
    Brawer, Michael K.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (04)
  • [42] CONSISTENCIES AND INCONSISTENCIES OF GLEASON SCORE AND GRADE GROUP SYSTEM IN PROSTATE BIOPSY AND RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Timofte, A. D.
    Giusca, Simona-Eliza
    Manole, Mariana Bianca
    Girlescu, Nona
    Profire, Bianca
    Prutianu, I
    Rusu, Andreea
    Caruntu, Irina-Draga
    MEDICAL-SURGICAL JOURNAL-REVISTA MEDICO-CHIRURGICALA, 2021, 125 (02): : 280 - 290
  • [43] Gleason score and margin status are the strongest predictors for benefit of radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy
    Van der Kwast, TH
    Bolla, M
    Van Poppel, H
    Van Cangh, PJ
    De Reijke, TM
    Vekemans, K
    Da Pozzo, L
    Bosset, JF
    Schröder, FH
    Collette, L
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (04): : 449 - 449
  • [44] The main grade of Gleason score 7 of the operative specimen is correlated with laboratory progression of patients treated by radical prostatectomy - Commentary
    Villers, A
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2002, 12 (01): : 35 - 35
  • [45] The main grade of Gleason score 7 of the operative specimen is correlated with laboratory progression of patients treated by radical prostatectomy.
    Tiguert, R
    Ravery, V
    Grignon, DJ
    Sakr, W
    Wood, DP
    Pontes, JE
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2002, 12 (01): : 31 - 36
  • [46] Is biopsy Gleason sum an independent predictor of biochemical progression following radical prostatectomy after adjusting for the pathological Gleason sum?
    Fitzsimons, N. J.
    Freedland, S.
    Presti, J., Jr.
    Amling, C.
    Kane, C.
    Terris, M.
    Aronson, W.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (18) : 254S - 254S
  • [47] The Effect of Higher Tertiary Gleason Patterns at Radical Prostatectomy on Biochemical Recurrence Free Survival Is Most Prominent With Gleason Score 4+4=8, Intermediate With Gleason Score 7, and Only Marginal With Gleason Score 6
    Baras, Alexander
    Parwani, Anil
    Epstein, Jonathan
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2015, 95 : 206A - 207A
  • [48] Significance of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in patients with Gleason score 7 after radical prostatectomy: a retrospective cohort study
    Li, Jiakun
    Guo, Yaochuan
    Qiu, Shi
    He, Mingjing
    Jin, Kun
    Zheng, Xiaonan
    Tu, Xiang
    Liao, Xinyang
    Yang, Lu
    Wei, Qiang
    ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2019, 12 : 7157 - 7164
  • [49] Increasing the number of biopsy cores improves the accuracy of the Gleason score when compared to radical prostatectomy Gleason score
    Coogan, CL
    Latchamsetty, KC
    Greenfield, J
    Corman, JM
    Porter, CR
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (04): : 479 - 479
  • [50] THE IMPACT OF DOWNGRADING FROM BIOPSY GLEASON SCORE 7 TO RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY GLEASON SCORE 6 ON BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE
    Ham, Won Sik
    Chalfin, Heather J.
    Feng, Zhaoyong
    Trock, Bruce J.
    Humphreys, Elizabeth
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Partin, Alan W.
    Han, Misop
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E713 - E713
12345