Outcome-Oriented Predictive Process Monitoring: Review and Benchmark

被引:200
|
作者
Teinemaa, Irene [1 ]
Dumas, Marlon [1 ]
La Rosa, Marcello [2 ]
Maggi, Fabrizio Maria [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tartu, J Liivi 2, EE-50409 Tartu, Estonia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Level 10,Doug McDonell Bldg, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Business process; predictive monitoring; sequence classification; EARLY CLASSIFICATION; CLASSIFIERS;
D O I
10.1145/3301300
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Predictive business process monitoring refers to the act of making predictions about the future state of ongoing cases of a business process, based on their incomplete execution traces and logs of historical (completed) traces. Motivated by the increasingly pervasive availability of fine-grained event data about business process executions, the problem of predictive process monitoring has received substantial attention in the past years. In particular, a considerable number of methods have been put forward to address the problem of outcome-oriented predictive process monitoring, which refers to classifying each ongoing case of a process according to a given set of possible categorical outcomes-e.g., Will the customer complain or not? Will an order be delivered, canceled, or withdrawn? Unfortunately, different authors have used different datasets, experimental settings, evaluation measures, and baselines to assess their proposals, resulting in poor comparability and an unclear picture of the relative merits and applicability of different methods. To address this gap, this article presents a systematic review and taxonomy of outcome-oriented predictive process monitoring methods, and a comparative experimental evaluation of eleven representative methods using a benchmark covering 24 predictive process monitoring tasks based on nine real-life event logs.
引用
收藏
页数:57
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Empirical research on instruction and special didactics - Outcome-oriented examination and the process quality of instruction
    Klieme, Eckhard
    Rakoczy, Katrin
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PADAGOGIK, 2008, 54 (02): : 222 - 237
  • [22] A NEW METHOD FOR OUTCOME-ORIENTED APPRAISAL OF QUALITY OF CARE
    LICHTENSTEIN, JL
    HORWITZ, RI
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1982, 30 (02): : A302 - A302
  • [23] Correction: Corrigendum: Outcome-oriented moral evaluation in terrorists
    Sandra Baez
    Eduar Herrera
    Adolfo M. García
    Facundo Manes
    Liane Young
    Agustín Ibáñez
    Nature Human Behaviour, 1 (1)
  • [24] The Impact of Process- vs. Outcome-Oriented Reviews on the Sales of Healthcare Services
    Li, Hongfei
    Peng, Jing
    Wang, Gang
    Bai, Xue
    INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2024,
  • [25] DUES FOR THE 90S - MULTICENTERED, OUTCOME-ORIENTED
    SWANSON, KA
    HOSPITAL FORMULARY, 1994, 29 : S26 - S31
  • [26] A second frontier: the physicians' journey to outcome-oriented medicine
    Sherwood, L
    EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE: A CRITICAL ASSESSMENT, 2002, 252 : 49 - 60
  • [27] Transferring an Outcome-Oriented Learning Architecture to an IT Learning Game
    Schmitz, Birgit
    Klemke, Roland
    Totschnig, Michael
    Czauderna, Andre
    Specht, Marcus
    TOWARDS UBIQUITOUS LEARNING, EC-TEL 2011, 2011, 6964 : 483 - +
  • [28] Outcome-Oriented Deep Temporal Phenotyping of Disease Progression
    Lee, Changhee
    Rashbass, Jem
    Van der Schaar, Mihaela
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 68 (08) : 2423 - 2434
  • [29] Outcome-oriented case planning in child and family services
    Traglia, JJ
    Pecora, PJ
    Paddock, G
    Wilson, L
    SYSTEM OF CARE FOR CHILDREN'S MENTAL HEALTH: EXPANDING THE RESEARCH BASE, ANNUAL RESEARCH CONFERENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 1996, : 237 - 239
  • [30] Deliverables of student engagement: developing an outcome-oriented model
    Malik, Sahil
    Hazarika, Deepti Dabas
    Dhaliwal, Amandeep
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION IN BUSINESS, 2022, 15 (02) : 221 - 249