Effect of flow channel number in multi-channel tubular ceramic microfiltration membranes on flux and small protein transmission in milk protein fractionation

被引:8
|
作者
Schopf, Roland [1 ]
Desch, Felix [1 ]
Schmitz, Ramona [1 ]
Arar, Dilara [1 ]
Kulozik, Ulrich [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, TUM Sch Life Sci, Weihenstephaner Berg 1, D-85354 Freising Weihenstephan, Germany
关键词
Skim milk; Deposit layer formation; Transmembrane pressure; Pressure drop; Channel configuration; UNIFORM TRANSMEMBRANE PRESSURE; WALL SHEAR-STRESS; SKIM MILK; LIMITING FLUX; FILTRATION; CASEIN; REMOVAL; IMPACT; DIAMETER; GEOMETRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.memsci.2021.120153
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Ceramic multi-channel microfiltration (MF) membrane elements exist in various configurations, partially with high numbers of flow channels to increase the active membrane surface area and flux. The open question was how multi-channel membranes with different channel numbers perform in applications of protein fractionation, where not only flux, but more importantly, also transmission of components counts as decisive criteria. In this study, ceramic membrane elements with 1-, 7-, 19-, and 37-channels with the same outer diameter were compared with the task of milk protein fractionation in their main fractions (casein micelles, about d = 180 nm in diameter, and whey proteins, 4-8 nm in size) using 0.1 gm MF as technical example. Flux and therefore the advective protein transport towards the membrane surface was expected to differ between outer and inner channels owing to the different resistance to flow of the permeate from the inner channels to the outer rim of the ceramic element. In fact, the fouling intensity exerted by the retained biopolymers differed. Permeate flux, as well as whey protein transmission, depend on number and position of the individual channels. The 37-channel membrane element with more inner channels was found superior in terms of permeate volume flow and whey protein transmission. The results can be explained by the less pronounced deposit layer formation on the inner channels due to the higher backpressure for the permeate, which reduces the flux and, thus, the intensity of deposit layer formation of retained casein micelles rendering the membrane surface more open for whey protein transmission.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Effects of selective layer properties of ceramic multi-channel microfiltration membranes on the milk protein fractionation
    Schiffer, Simon
    Matyssek, Andreas
    Hartinger, Martin
    Bolduan, Peter
    Mund, Peter
    Kulozik, Ulrich
    SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 259
  • [2] Microfiltration: Effect of retentate protein concentration on limiting flux and serum protein removal with 4-mm-channel ceramic microfiltration membranes
    Hurt, E. E.
    Adams, M. C.
    Barbano, D. M.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2015, 98 (04) : 2234 - 2244
  • [3] Effect of low-frequency pulsatile crossflow microfiltration on flux and protein transmission in milk protein fractionation
    Weinberger, Maria E.
    Kulozik, Ulrich
    SEPARATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 56 (06) : 1112 - 1127
  • [4] Effect of low-frequency pulsatile crossflow microfiltration on flux and protein transmission in milk protein fractionation
    Weinberger, Maria E.
    Kulozik, Ulrich
    Separation Science and Technology (Philadelphia), 2021, 56 (06): : 1112 - 1127
  • [5] Effect of ceramic membrane channel geometry and uniform transmembrane pressure on limiting flux and serum protein removal during skim milk microfiltration
    Adams, Michael C.
    Hurt, Emily E.
    Barbano, David M.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2015, 98 (11) : 7527 - 7543
  • [6] Effect of ceramic membrane channel diameter on limiting retentate protein concentration during skim milk microfiltration
    Adams, Michael C.
    Barbano, David M.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2016, 99 (01) : 167 - 182
  • [7] Milk Protein Fractionation by Means of Spiral-Wound Microfiltration Membranes: Effect of the Pressure Adjustment Mode and Temperature on Flux and Protein Permeation
    Hartinger, Martin
    Heidebrecht, Hans-Juergen
    Schiffer, Simon
    Dumpler, Joseph
    Kulozik, Ulrich
    FOODS, 2019, 8 (06):
  • [8] Microfiltration: Effect of channel diameter on limiting flux and serum protein removal
    Hurt, E. E.
    Adams, M. C.
    Barbano, D. M.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2015, 98 (06) : 3599 - 3612
  • [9] Effect of different diafiltration process on the protein fractionation of skim milk by cross flow microfiltration
    Song, Bo
    Zhang, Yumeng
    Lu, Jing
    Pang, Xiaoyang
    Wei, Miaohong
    Zheng, Sifan
    Zhang, Min
    Zhang, Shuwen
    Lv, Jiaping
    LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 152
  • [10] Comparative Assessment of Tubular Ceramic, Spiral Wound, and Hollow Fiber Membrane Microfiltration Module Systems for Milk Protein Fractionation
    Schopf, Roland
    Schmidt, Florian
    Linner, Johanna
    Kulozik, Ulrich
    FOODS, 2021, 10 (04)