Reaction of soil water repellency to artificially induced changes in soil pH

被引:54
|
作者
Diehl, D. [1 ]
Bayer, J. V. [1 ,2 ]
Woche, S. K. [3 ]
Bryant, R. [2 ]
Doerr, S. H. [4 ]
Schaumann, G. E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Koblenz Landau, Inst Environm Sci, Dept Environm & Soil Chem, D-76829 Landau, Germany
[2] Univ Coll Swansea, Sch Engn, Swansea SA2 8PP, W Glam, Wales
[3] Leibniz Univ Hannover, Inst Soil Sci, D-30419 Hannover, Germany
[4] Univ Coll Swansea, Dept Geog, Swansea SA2 8PP, W Glam, Wales
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
Soil water repellency; pH; Surface charge; HUMIC SUBSTANCES; ORGANIC-MATTER; CONTACT-ANGLE; SANDY SOILS; ACID; SURFACE; WETTABILITY; SAMPLES; IMPACT; FUNGI;
D O I
10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.06.005
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Soil water repellency (SWR) is widely thought to be influenced by soil pH, however, few studies have systematically investigated the relationship between these variables. Specifically the hypothesis that the pH may control repellency via changes in the variable surface charge of soil material has not yet been tested. In previous work, methods for changing soil pH have also involved changes in soil moisture, but it has been argued that the potential influence of soil moisture changes needs to be eliminated before the actual relationship between pH and SWR can be isolated. The paper addresses this research gap using a new method, which enables adjustment of the pH of soils with low moisture content via the gas phase and thus involves minimal change in moisture content, allowing the response of SWR to pH changes to be evaluated. The method was applied to 14 soil samples from Germany, The Netherlands, the UK, and Australia, using the water drop penetration time (WDPT) as the indicator of SWR. Additionally, sessile drop contact angles (theta(ess)) were measured on the four samples from Germany and the titratable surface charge of these four soils was measured at selected pH values using a particle charge detector (PCD). Changes in SWR with soil pH were found to be influenced by the density and type of sites able to interact with protons at the available surfaces of organic and mineral materials in soil. The maximum SWR occurred for soil at natural pH and where the charge density was minimal. As pH increased, negative surface charge increased due to deprotonation of sites and WDPT decreased. Two types of behaviour were observed: i) a decrease in repellency with decreasing pH, probably because of a sufficient number of proton accepting surface sites with a significant amount of positive surface charge, ii) no decrease in repellency with decreasing pH in soils with insufficient proton accepting surface sites to develop significant positive surface charge. The data suggest that the availability and relative abundance of proton active sites at mineral surfaces, and those at organic functional groups influence the response of the soil samples to changes in pH. The variety of geographic origins and histories of the soils examined provides a distinction between site specific and more widely applicable soil characteristics of pH dependent SWR. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:375 / 384
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Understanding the mechanism of soil water repellency at nanoscale
    Mao, Jiefei
    Chen, Baoliang
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2018, 256
  • [32] Rethinking soil water repellency and its management
    Katinka X. Ruthrof
    Anna J. M. Hopkins
    Melissa Danks
    Graham O’Hara
    Richard Bell
    David Henry
    Rachel Standish
    Mark Tibbett
    John Howieson
    Treena Burgess
    Richard Harper
    [J]. Plant Ecology, 2019, 220 : 977 - 984
  • [33] Rethinking soil water repellency and its management
    Ruthrof, Katinka X.
    Hopkins, Anna J. M.
    Danks, Melissa
    O'Hara, Graham
    Bell, Richard
    Henry, David
    Standish, Rachel
    Tibbett, Mark
    Howieson, John
    Burgess, Treena
    Harper, Richard
    [J]. PLANT ECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (10) : 977 - 984
  • [34] Small variations in soil properties control fire-induced water repellency
    Mataix-Solera, J.
    Arcenegui, V
    Zavala, L. M.
    Perez-Bejarano, A.
    Jordan, A.
    Morugan-Coronado, A.
    Barcenas-Moreno, G.
    Jimenez-Pinilla, P.
    Lozano, E.
    Granged, A. J. P.
    Gil-Torres, J.
    [J]. SPANISH JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2014, 4 (01): : 51 - 60
  • [35] Extent and persistence of soil water repellency induced by pines in different geographic regions
    Iovino, Massimo
    Pekarova, Pavla
    Hallett, Paul D.
    Pekar, Jan
    Lichner, L'ubomir
    Mataix-Solera, Jorge
    Alagna, Vincenzo
    Walsh, Richard
    Raffan, Annette
    Schacht, Karsten
    Rodny, Marek
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY AND HYDROMECHANICS, 2018, 66 (04) : 360 - 368
  • [36] Soil water repellency and chemical soil properties in a beech forest soil Spatial variability and interrelations
    Krueger, Jiem
    Boettcher, Juergen
    Schmunk, Christian
    Bachmann, Joerg
    [J]. GEODERMA, 2016, 271 : 50 - 62
  • [37] Impact of fungal and bacterial biocides on microbial induced water repellency in arable soil
    Feeney, Debbie S.
    Hallett, Paul D.
    Rodger, Sheena
    Bengough, A. Glyn
    White, Nia A.
    Young, Lain M.
    [J]. GEODERMA, 2006, 135 : 72 - 80
  • [38] Plant and soil communities are associated with the response of soil water repellency to environmental stress
    Seaton, Fiona M.
    Jones, Davey L.
    Creer, Simon
    George, Paul B. L.
    Smart, Simon M.
    Lebron, Inma
    Barrett, Gaynor
    Emmett, Bridget A.
    Robinson, David A.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 687 : 929 - 938
  • [39] Relationship between soil water repellency and some of soil properties in northern Iran
    Mirbabaei, Seiyde Mehrnoosh
    Shahrestani, Mahmoud Shabanpour
    Zolfaghari, Aliasghar
    Abkenar, Kambiz Taheri
    [J]. CATENA, 2013, 108 : 26 - 34
  • [40] Post-fire soil water repellency: Persistence and soil moisture thresholds
    MacDonald, LH
    Huffman, EL
    [J]. SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2004, 68 (05) : 1729 - 1734