The influence of a joint displacement on torque, angle and angular velocity during isokinetic knee extension/flexion. An experimental investigation

被引:3
|
作者
Verdonck, AJ
Reimann, U [1 ]
Wiek, M
机构
[1] Univ Gesamthsch Siegen, Inst Mech & Regelungstech, D-57068 Siegen, Germany
[2] Krankenhaus Sportverletzte Hellersen, Abt Sportmed, Bereich Biokinet & Biomech EDV, D-58515 Ludenscheid, Germany
关键词
isokinetics; angle; torque; angular velocity; joint displacement; measurement error;
D O I
10.3233/IES-1997-6405
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
In this article we investigated the influence of a displacement of the knee joint in relation to the axis of the isokinetic device on the measured torque, angle and angular velocity during isokinetic knee extension/flexion. We analysed the motion of the knee joint of four young men with the CCD-camera system KINEMETRIX (ORTHODATA GmbH, Ludenscheid, Germany) at different isokinetic speed (60 degrees/s and 180 degrees/s), using a device with a stationary (CYBEX 6000, LUMEN Inc., Ronkonkoma, NY) and a device with an instationary (LIDO ACTIVE, LOREDAN Biomedical Inc., Davies, California) tibial pad. The results show that the displacement of the knee joint in relation to the axis of the device using the instationary (sliding) input cuff is greater than using the stationary cuff. The torque errors range from 0% to -15% using the stationary pad and from +10% to -20% using the instationary cuff. While it is impossible to correct the torque values using the stationary pad (the displacement cannot be measured), the sliding cuff allows a mathematical correction of the torque values after the exercise. The max, torque error can be reduced below 2%. The largest deviations in angle occur at the higher speed (180 degrees/s). At the moment the knee is in full extension, the max. error amounts approximately 20 degrees. At lower speed (60 degrees/s) the max. error amounts around 10 degrees. The device with the stationary input cuff produces more accurate results. The measurement errors are below 10 degrees. Using the instationary cuff, the selected isokinetic speed of 60 degrees/s and 180 degrees/s had been kept well. Considering the angular velocity of the knee joint during a test session, no real isokinetic state could be found. The device with the stationary input cuff has no real isokinetic state of the knee joint during the ROM too. In addition, the speed control during the motion is insufficient. Analysing the different factors which can influence the test results, it must be said that a comparison of test results, receiving from different isokinetic devices, is not possible resp. very questionable at today's state of the art.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 233
页数:11
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [21] Influence of Increasing Joint Angle, Angular Velocity and External Load in the Extension Movement of the Elbow in Two Different Group Ages
    Romero Avila, E.
    Perez Sanpablo, A., I
    Disselhorst-Klug, C.
    Meneses Penaloza, A.
    Arellano Saldana, M. E.
    Gutierrez Martinez, J.
    Ibarra Zannatha, J. M.
    2019 GLOBAL MEDICAL ENGINEERING PHYSICS EXCHANGES/PAN AMERICAN HEALTH CARE EXCHANGES (GMEPE/PAHCE), 2019,
  • [22] A mathematical modelling study investigating the influence of knee joint flexion angle and extension moment on patellofemoral joint reaction force and stress (vol 26, pg 1323, 2019)
    Takabayashi, Tomoya
    Edama, Mutsuaki
    Inai, Takuma
    Tokunaga, Yuta
    Kubo, Masayoshi
    KNEE, 2020, 27 (02): : 614 - 614
  • [23] Estimations of relative effort during sit-to-stand increase when accounting for variations in maximum voluntary torque with joint angle and angular velocity
    Bieryla, Kathleen A.
    Anderson, Dennis E.
    Madigan, Michael L.
    JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY, 2009, 19 (01) : 139 - 144
  • [24] Hip and knee joints are more stabilized than driven during the stance phase of gait: An analysis of the 3D angle between joint moment and joint angular velocity
    Dumas, R.
    Cheze, L.
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2008, 28 (02) : 243 - 250