Drivers and barriers in the transition to open science: the perspective of stakeholders in the Spanish scientific community

被引:7
|
作者
Gonzalez-Teruel, Aurora [1 ]
Lopez-Borrull, Alexandre [2 ]
Santos-Hermosa, Gema [3 ]
Abad-Garcia, Francisca [1 ]
Olle, Candela [2 ]
Serrano-Vicente, Rocio [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valencia, Fac Med & Odontol, Dept Hist Ciencia & Documentacio, Avda Blasco Ibanez 15, Valencia 46010, Spain
[2] Univ Oberta Catalunya, Estudis Ciencies Informac & Comunicac, Av Tibidabo 39-43, Barcelona 08035, Spain
[3] Univ Barcelona, Fac Informac & Mitjans Audiovisuals, Melcior de Palau 140, Barcelona 08014, Spain
[4] Univ Navarra, Apartado 177, Pamplona 31009, Spain
来源
PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION | 2022年 / 31卷 / 03期
关键词
Open science; Open access; Open research data; Research assessment; Open peer review; Scientific system; Legislation; Research funding; Feasibility; Spain; OPEN ACCESS; ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.3145/epi.2022.may.05
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This paper presents the results of a research study whose objective was to identify the facilitating factors and barriers that, in the opinion of representatives of the Spanish scientific community, impact the implementation of the new open science model in four areas: open access, open research data, research assessment and open peer review. A qualitative study was designed in which information was obtained through interviews with researchers, editors of scientific journals, representatives of assessment agencies and vice-chancellors, and through a focus group of librarians with expertise in aspects of open science. The enabling factors and barriers identified were related to the researcher and the fruit of their research, as well as to the scientific ecosystem, which provides direct institutional support and backing (universities/research centres), the regulatory framework (management of the science system) and the science communication system (media). The results indicate that a shift in scientific practices toward the open science model can only be achieved if there is a policy framework that integrates all initiatives and links into the scientific assessment and reward system, and if the necessary funding is in place to support this transition.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [21] Science policy: Policy, politics and perspective - The scientific community must distinguish analysis from advocacy.
    Pielke, RA
    [J]. NATURE, 2002, 416 (6879) : 367 - 368
  • [22] NEARCHOS. Networked Archaeological Open Science: Advances in Archaeology Through Field Analytics and Scientific Community Sharing
    Nicolò Marchetti
    Ivana Angelini
    Gilberto Artioli
    Giacomo Benati
    Gabriele Bitelli
    Antonio Curci
    Gustavo Marfia
    Marco Roccetti
    [J]. Journal of Archaeological Research, 2018, 26 : 447 - 469
  • [23] NEARCHOS. Networked Archaeological Open Science: Advances in Archaeology Through Field Analytics and Scientific Community Sharing
    Marchetti, Nicolo
    Angelini, Ivana
    Artioli, Gilberto
    Benati, Giacomo
    Bitelli, Gabriele
    Curci, Antonio
    Marfia, Gustavo
    Roccetti, Marco
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 26 (04) : 447 - 469
  • [24] Information sites for professional scientometrics community: The overview of the Third Scientific Conference "Scientometrics, bibliometrics, open data and publications in science"
    Guskov, Andrey E.
    Mazov, Nikolay A.
    Gureev, Vadim N.
    Borgoyakova, Kristina S.
    [J]. NAUCHNYE I TEKHNICHESKIE BIBLIOTEKI-SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL LIBRARIES, 2021, (12): : 125 - 142