Alcohol brief intervention, specialty treatment and drinking outcomes at 12 months: Results from a systematic alcohol screening and brief intervention initiative in adult primary care

被引:12
|
作者
Chi, Felicia W.
Parthasarathy, Sujaya
Palzes, Vanessa A.
Kline-Simon, Andrea H.
Metz, Verena E.
Weisner, Constance
Satre, Derek D.
Campbell, Cynthia I.
Elson, Joseph
Ross, Thekla B.
Lu, Yun
Sterling, Stacy A.
机构
[1] Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, 94612, CA
[2] Department of Psychiatry, Weill Institute of Neurosciences, University of California, 401 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, 94143, CA
[3] The Permanente Medical Group, 1600 Owens Street, San Francisco, 94158, CA
关键词
Unhealthy alcohol use; Alcohol brief intervention; Systematic primary care -based SBIRT; Electronic health records; Causal inference; Effect heterogeneity; MARGINAL STRUCTURAL MODELS; USE DISORDER; PHARMACOTHERAPY; EMULATE; TRIALS; STATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109458
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Alcohol screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment (SBIRT) in adult primary care is an evidence-based, public health strategy to address unhealthy alcohol use, but evidence of effectiveness of alcohol brief intervention (ABI) in real-world implementation is lacking. Methods: We fit marginal structural models with inverse probability weighting to estimate the causal effects of ABI on 12-month drinking outcomes using longitudinal electronic health records data for 312,056 adults with a positive screening result for unhealthy drinking between 2014 and 2017 in a large healthcare system that implemented systematic primary care-based SBIRT. We examined effects of ABI with and without adjusting for receipt of specialty alcohol use disorder (AUD) treatment, and whether effects varied by patient demographic characteristics and alcohol use patterns. Results: Receiving ABI resulted in significantly greater reductions in heavy drinking days (mean difference [95% CI] = -0.26 [-0.45, - 0.08]), drinking days per week (-0.04 [-0.07, - 0.01]), drinks per drinking day (-0.05 [-0.08, - 0.02]) and drinks per week (-0.16 [-0.27, -0.04]). Effects of ABI on 12-month drinking outcomes varied by baseline consumption level, age group and whether patients already had an AUD, with better improvement in those who were drinking at levels exceeding only daily limits, younger, and without an AUD. Conclusions: Systematic ABI in adult primary care has the potential to reduce drinking among people with unhealthy drinking considerably on both an individual and population level. More research is needed to help optimize ABI, in particular tailoring it to diverse sub-populations, and studying its long-term public health impact.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Screening and brief intervention for alcohol misuse in primary care settings in Singapore: A missed opportunity?
    Zhang, Bei
    Namasivayam, Vikneswaran
    Lim, Reina
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 33 : 395 - 395
  • [32] Alcohol screening and brief intervention among drug users in primary care: a discussion paper
    C. A. Field
    J. Klimas
    J. Barry
    G. Bury
    E. Keenan
    S. Lyons
    B. P. Smyth
    W. Cullen
    Irish Journal of Medical Science, 2012, 181 : 165 - 170
  • [33] Implementing alcohol screening and brief intervention in primary care: identifying barriers, proposing solutions
    J Aaron Johnson
    J Paul Seale
    Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, 10 (Suppl 1)
  • [34] Impact of Resident Training on Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention Services in Primary Care Clinic
    Dhabliwala, Jason
    Johnson, Aaron
    Seale, J. Paul
    SUBSTANCE ABUSE, 2013, 34 (02) : 208 - 209
  • [35] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Health Care Utilization Outcomes in Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention Trials
    Bray, Jeremy W.
    Cowell, Alexander J.
    Hinde, Jesse M.
    MEDICAL CARE, 2011, 49 (03) : 287 - 294
  • [36] Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral for Alcohol Use in Adolescents: A Systematic Review
    Yuma-Guerrero, Paula J.
    Lawson, Karla A.
    Velasquez, Mary M.
    von Sternberg, Kirk
    Maxson, Todd
    Garcia, Nilda
    PEDIATRICS, 2012, 130 (01) : 115 - 122
  • [37] GENDER DIFFERENCES IN ALCOHOL SCREENING, BRIEF INTERVENTION AND REFERRAL TO TREATMENT: FINDINGS FROM AN IMPLEMENTATION STUDY IN PRIMARY CARE SETTING
    Weisner, C.
    Chi, F.
    Ross, T.
    Sterling, S.
    Mertens, J.
    ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2017, 41 : 337A - 337A
  • [38] Alcohol Electronic Screening and Brief Intervention A Community Guide Systematic Review
    Tansil, Kristin A.
    Esser, Marissa B.
    Sandhu, Paramjit
    Reynolds, Jeffrey A.
    Elder, Randy W.
    Williamson, Rebecca S.
    Chattopadhyay, Sajal K.
    Bohm, Michele K.
    Brewer, Robert D.
    McKnight-Eily, Lela R.
    Hungerford, Daniel W.
    Toomey, Traci L.
    Hingson, Ralph W.
    Fielding, Jonathan E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2016, 51 (05) : 801 - 811
  • [39] BRIEF INTERVENTIONS FOR ALCOHOL IN GENERAL PRACTICE Encouraging results from the Scottish alcohol brief intervention programme
    Rice, Peter
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 356
  • [40] Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention in Primary Health Care in Kazakhstan-Results of a Cluster Randomised Pilot Study
    Verthein, Uwe
    Lahusen, Harald
    Martens, Marcus Sebastian
    Prilutskaya, Mariya
    Yussopov, Oleg
    Kaliyeva, Zhanar
    Schulte, Bernd
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 67