Mechanism and Predictors of Failed Transradial Approach for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions

被引:169
|
作者
Dehghani, Payam
Mohammad, Atif
Bajaj, Ravi
Hong, Tony
Suen, Colin M.
Sharieff, Waseem [2 ]
Chisholm, Robert J.
Kutryk, Michael J. B. [2 ]
Fam, Neil P.
Cheema, Asim N. [1 ]
机构
[1] St Michaels Hosp, Div Cardiol, Terrence Donnelly Heart Ctr, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
coronary intervention; radial artery; vascular access; ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; FEMORAL ACCESS; RADIAL ARTERY; STENT IMPLANTATION; RANDOMIZED-TRIALS; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; VASCULAR ACCESS; ANGIOPLASTY; IMPACT; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcin.2009.07.014
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives The study aimed to determine the mechanism and predictors of procedural failure in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from the transradial approach (TR). Background Transradial approach PCI reduces vascular complications compared with a transfemoral approach (TF). However, the mechanism and predictors of TR-PCI failure have not been well-characterized. Methods The study population consisted of patients undergoing TR-PCI by low-to-intermediate volume operators with traditional TF guide catheters. Baseline characteristics, procedure details, and clinical outcomes were prospectively collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine independent predictors of TR-PCI failure. Results A total of 2,100 patients underwent TR-PCI and represented 38% of PCI volume. Mean age was 64 12 years, and 17% were female. Vascular complications occurred in 22 (1%), and TR-PCI failure was observed in 98 (4.7%) patients. The mechanism of TR-PCI failure included inability to advance guide catheter to ascending aorta in 50 (51%), inadequate guide catheter support in 35 (36%), and unsuccessful radial artery puncture in 13 (13%) patients. The PCI was successful in 94 (96%) patients with TR-PCI failure by switching to TF. On multivariate analysis, age >75 years (odds ratio [OR]: 3.86; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.33 to 6.40, p = 0.0006), prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (OR: 7.47; 95% CI: 3.45 to 16.19, p = 0.0002), and height (OR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.95 to 0.99, p = 0.02) were independent predictors of TR-PCI failure. Conclusions Transradial approach PCI can be performed by low-to-intermediate volume operators with standard equipment with a low failure rate. Age >75 years, prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and short stature are independent predictors of TR-PCI failure. Appropriate patient selection and careful risk assessment are needed to maximize benefits offered by TR-PCI. (J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2009;2:1057-64) (C) 2009 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
引用
收藏
页码:1057 / 1064
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The transradial approach An increasingly used standard for coronary diagnosis and interventions
    Ludwig, J.
    Achenbach, S.
    Daniel, W. G.
    Arnold, M.
    HERZ, 2011, 36 (05) : 386 - 394
  • [42] Distal transradial access as default approach for coronary angiography and interventions
    Peixoto Oliveira, Marcos Danillo
    Navarro, Ednelson Cunha
    Kiemeneij, Ferdinand
    CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2019, 9 (05) : 513 - 519
  • [43] Factors predicting neurological complications following percutaneous coronary angiography and interventions in a large series of transfemoral and transradial approach
    Marcos, H. Tizon
    Barbeau, G. R.
    Nguyen, C. M.
    Noel, B.
    Bagur, R. H.
    Rodes-Cabau, J. R.
    Larose, E.
    Rinfret, S.
    Delarochelliere, R. H.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2009, 30 : 527 - 527
  • [44] BALLOON ASSISTED SHEATHLESS TRANSRADIAL INTERVENTION IN 5 FRENCH PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTIONS
    Ratcliffe, Justin A.
    Huang, Yili
    Liou, Michael
    Pancholy, Samir
    Kwan, Tak
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 59 (13) : E185 - E185
  • [45] Incidence and predictors of stroke after percutaneous coronary intervention in the era of transradial intervention
    Shoji, S.
    Kohsaka, S.
    Ueda, I.
    Sawano, M.
    Ikemura, N.
    Katsuki, T.
    Hiraide, T.
    Maekawa, Y.
    Yuasa, S.
    Hayashida, K.
    Noma, S.
    Suzuki, M.
    Numasawa, Y.
    Miyata, H.
    Fukuda, K.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2017, 38 : 414 - 415
  • [46] Predictors of emergency coronary artery bypass grafting in percutaneous coronary interventions
    Seshadri, N
    Acharya, N
    Houghtaling, P
    Blackstone, E
    Ellis, SG
    Whitlow, PL
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2002, 39 (05) : 334A - 335A
  • [47] ORIGINAL ARTICLES COMPARISON OF TRANSRADIAL APPROACH AND TRANSFEMORAL APPROACH FOR PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION
    孙玲
    LIMBRUNO Ugo
    ChinaMedicalAbstracts(InternalMedicine), 2003, (01) : 62 - 64
  • [48] Reducing the risk of emergency bypass surgery for failed percutaneous coronary interventions
    Bittl, JA
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 46 (11) : 2010 - 2012
  • [49] Sheathless Transradial Approach for Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Fang, Hsiu-Yu
    Wu, Chiung-Jen
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 109 (07): : 96S - 96S
  • [50] Transradial approach for percutaneous coronary stenting in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction
    de la Llera, LSD
    Andray, JAF
    Moreno, SG
    Rueda, EA
    Quero, MF
    Fernández-Cortacero, JAP
    Prada, SB
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2004, 57 (08): : 732 - 736