Optimization of couch angles and number of arcs in non-coplanar VMAT for pituitary adenomas

被引:0
|
作者
Limpichotikul, N. [1 ]
Yongvithisatid, P. [2 ]
Pairat, K. [2 ]
Dechsupa, P. [2 ]
Changkaew, P. [3 ]
Suphaphong, S. [3 ]
Stansook, N. [3 ]
Savaphatiboon, S. [1 ,3 ]
Tangboonduangjit, P. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Mahidol Univ, Ramathibodi Hosp, Fac Med, Master Sci Program Med Phys, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
[2] Mahidol Univ, Ramathibodi Hosp, Fac Med, Radiosurg Ctr, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
[3] Mahidol Univ, Ramathibodi Hosp, Fac Med, Dept Diagnost & Therapeut Radiol, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
关键词
THERAPY VMAT; RADIATION; BRAIN; EXPOSURE; COPLANAR; CANCER;
D O I
10.1088/1742-6596/1248/1/012059
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Non-coplanar VMAT spares critical organs with short delivery time while maintaining PTV coverage. Due to the growth patterns of pituitary adenoma, the beam angle selection step was simplified by finding the optimal couch angles and number of arcs. The 2 clinical cases with difference PTV sizes were selected to study the results of dose distribution between coplanar and non-coplanar techniques. Later, couch angles were varied from 30 degrees to 90 degrees and 270 degrees to 330 degrees with a 15 degrees interval. The numbers of arcs were varied from 3 to 4 arcs. Then, the selected protocol was applied to 5 pituitary adenoma patients. It was found that 90 degrees and 270 degrees couch angle showed the highest scores. However, these beams passed directly through the body, so the second couch angles of 75 degrees and 285 degrees were selected instead. For number of arcs optimization, 3-arc plan and 4-arc plan demonstrated a similar score. However, the 3-arc plan illustrated an obviously shorter treatment time. After the selection was proven to the 5 patients, there were 4 patients who passed the criteria, while 1 patient did not pass the hippocampal planning criteria. In conclusion, the suggested couch angles were 75 degrees and 285 degrees. The optimal number of arcs for pituitary adenoma was 3 arcs.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of a Hybrid IMRT/VMAT technique with non-coplanar VMAT and non-coplanar IMRT for unresectable olfactory neuroblastoma using the RayStation treatment planning system-EUD, NTCP and planning study
    Raturi, Vijay P.
    Motegi, Atsushi
    Zenda, Sadamoto
    Nakamura, Naoki
    Hojo, Hidehiro
    Kageyama, Shin-Ichiro
    Okumura, Masayuki
    Rachi, Toshiya
    Ohyoshi, Hajime
    Tachibana, Hidenobu
    Motegi, Kana
    Ariji, Takaki
    Nakamura, Masaki
    Hirano, Yasuhiro
    Hirata, Hidenari
    Akimoto, Tetsuo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2021, 62 (03) : 540 - 548
  • [32] Fully Integrated Computerized Beam Angle Optimization for Coplanar and Non-Coplanar IMRT Treatments of Head and Neck-Cancer Patients and Implications for VMAT
    Dirkx, M.
    Voet, P.
    Breedveld, S.
    Heijmen, B.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (06)
  • [33] Dosimetric Comparison of coplanar or non-coplanar IMRT and VMAT in the Irradiation of malignant Tumors of the Scalp (total scalp irradiation)
    Ostheimer, C.
    Janich, M.
    Huebsch, P.
    Gerlach, R.
    Vordermark, D.
    [J]. STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2014, 190 : 67 - 67
  • [34] Evaluation of the RUBY modular QA phantom for planar and non-coplanar VMAT and stereotactic radiations
    Poppinga, Daniela
    Kretschmer, Jana
    Brodbek, Leonie
    Meyners, Jutta
    Poppe, Bjoern
    Looe, Hui Khee
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 21 (10): : 69 - 79
  • [35] Dosimetric comparison of coplanar, non-coplanar and multi-planar VMAT for radiotherapy patients with primary brain tumor
    Cheung, Eva Y. W.
    Cheng, Dominic Y. T.
    Cheng, Janice K. Y.
    Yung, Sapphire H. Y.
    Cheng, Fandy Y. C.
    Ng, Shirley
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2022, 33 : S527 - S527
  • [36] Dosimetric Differences of VMAT, Non-Coplanar IMRT and IMPT for Treatment Planning of Glioblastoma Multiforme
    Nguyen, T.
    Algan, O.
    Ahmad, S.
    Herman, T.
    Herman, T. De La Fuente
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E330 - E330
  • [37] Dose distribution comparison for WBRT with hippocampal sparing using HyperArc and non-coplanar VMAT
    Tolstoukhova, V.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 170 : S1295 - S1295
  • [38] Dose plan assessment of coplanar and non-coplanar beam angle optimization algorithms
    Ventura, T.
    Rocha, H.
    Ferreira, B. C.
    Khouri, L.
    Dias, J.
    Lopes, M. C.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 119 : S764 - S764
  • [39] Automated Non-Coplanar VMAT for Dose Escalation in Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer Patients
    Woods, Kaley
    Chin, Robert K.
    Cook, Kiri A.
    Sheng, Ke
    Kishan, Amar U.
    Hegde, John V.
    Tenn, Stephen
    Steinberg, Michael L.
    Cao, Minsong
    [J]. CANCERS, 2021, 13 (08)
  • [40] A two-beam non-coplanar class solution to supplement VMAT in prostate SBRT
    Sharfo, A. W.
    Rossi, L.
    Dirkx, M.
    Aluwini, S.
    Breedveld, S.
    Heijmen, B.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 133 : S275 - S275