Indirect approaches to individual aircraft structural monitoring

被引:10
|
作者
Wallace, M
Azzam, H
Newman, S
机构
[1] Smith Aerosp Elect Syst, Southampton SO53 4YG, Hants, England
[2] Univ Southampton, Sch Engn Sci, Southampton, Hants, England
关键词
aircraft structural monitoring; individual aircraft tracking (IAT); recorded flight parameters;
D O I
10.1243/0954410042467059
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
At present, aircraft structural integrity is maintained by equally applying to an entire fleet knowledge obtained during the design phase and/or from a fleet sample and by introducing conservative assumptions, load surveys, costly inspections and maintenance procedures to safeguard airworthiness. Several investigations have highlighted the significant variations in individual aircraft usage and have indicated the inadequacy of applying 'conservative' assumptions and updating the assumptions by monitoring a fleet sample. They have, in addition, suggested the importance of individual aircraft tracking (IAT). IAT can be achieved by fitting each aircraft with strain gauges to monitor critical component loads directly, but maintaining a large number of strain gauges entails high operational costs. Affordable IAT can be achieved by analysing recorded flight parameters to indicate usage, loads and fatigue indirectly. This paper reviews the key investigations into indirect IAT structural monitoring methods.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 346
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Individual aircraft life monitoring: An engineering approach for fatigue damage evaluation
    Rui JIAO
    Xiaofan HE
    Yuhai LI
    Chinese Journal of Aeronautics , 2018, (04) : 727 - 739
  • [32] Theories on climate awareness: structural, institutional and individual approaches
    Daniel, Muth
    TER ES TARSADALOM, 2022, 36 (04): : 86 - 107
  • [33] Active Learning Approaches to Structural Health Monitoring
    Bull, L.
    Manson, G.
    Worden, K.
    Dervilis, N.
    SPECIAL TOPICS IN STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, VOL 5, 2019, : 157 - 159
  • [34] Integrated Structural Health Monitoring System for Civil Aircraft Structures
    Qing, Xinlin P.
    Sun, Hu
    Lu, Mingyu
    STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING 2015: SYSTEM RELIABILITY FOR VERIFICATION AND IMPLEMENTATION, VOLS. 1 AND 2, 2015, : 79 - 86
  • [35] Thin-film sensors for structural health monitoring of aircraft
    不详
    MATERIALS EVALUATION, 2006, 64 (10) : 1026 - 1026
  • [36] Wireless and Battery less Accelerometry for Aircraft Structural Health Monitoring
    Montheard, R.
    Escriba, C.
    Fourniols, J. -Y.
    Lastapis, M.
    Prunet, J. -M.
    Bafleur, M.
    Dilhac, J. -M.
    STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING 2011: CONDITION-BASED MAINTENANCE AND INTELLIGENT STRUCTURES, VOL 1, 2011, : 471 - +
  • [37] Structural Health Monitoring Cost Estimation of a Piezosensorized Aircraft Fuselage
    Giannakeas, Ilias N.
    Khodaei, Zahra Sharif
    Aliabadi, M. H. Ferri
    SENSORS, 2022, 22 (05)
  • [38] An Innovative Structural Fatigue Monitoring Solution for General Aviation Aircraft
    Keryk, Christopher
    Sabatini, Roberto
    Kourousis, Kyriakos
    Gardi, Alessandro
    Silva, Jose M.
    JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 10
  • [39] Aircraft Maintenance: Structural Health Monitoring Influence on Costs and Practices
    Manco, Pasquale
    Caterino, Mario
    Macchiaroli, Roberto
    Rinaldi, Marta
    Fera, Marcello
    MACROMOLECULAR SYMPOSIA, 2021, 396 (01)
  • [40] Acoustic Emission: An Indispensable Structural Health Monitoring Means for Aircraft
    Geng, Rongsheng
    Jing, Peng
    ADVANCES IN ACOUSTIC EMISSION TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 158 : 503 - 512