A multicriteria decision analysis for the evaluation of microalgal growth and harvesting

被引:11
|
作者
Unay, Elifnaz [1 ]
Ozkaya, Bestami [1 ]
Yoruklu, Hulya Civelek [1 ]
机构
[1] Yildiz Tech Univ, Fac Civil Engn, Environm Engn Dept, Davutpasa Campus, TR-34220 Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Microalgae; Cultivation systems; Harvesting techniques; TOPSIS; Microalgae utilization; CROSS-FLOW MICROFILTRATION; WASTE-WATER TREATMENT; TUBULAR PHOTOBIOREACTOR; CHLORELLA-VULGARIS; BIOFUELS; CULTIVATION; BIOMASS; BIOFLOCCULANT; OPTIMIZATION; FLOCCULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130561
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Biomass obtained from microalgae research studies gained momentum in recent years because of their extensive application potential in multiple industries such as high-value nutraceuticals, bioproducts, cosmetics, animal feed industries, and biofuels while being a sustainable and environmentally friendly option. Although they have high biomass yields and rapid growth rates there are some limitations and challenges that remain for large-scale commercialized cultivation and harvesting methods of microalgae. Since there are multiple pathways related to efficient cultivation and harvesting methods to be viable, this study adopted, TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution), a multi-criteria decision-making tool, to find the most acceptable alternative by using excel spreadsheets to evaluate the information that is derived from literature and pilot-scale studies. As a result, tubular (helical) and plate (flat panel) photobioreactors (PBRs) for cultivation and chemical harvesting (with chitosan) and bio-flocculation for harvesting were deemed suitable, while plastic bag PBR and suspended air flotation were deemed unsuitable. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ANALYSIS OF MULTICRITERIA DECISION AID IN EUROPE
    VINCKE, P
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1986, 25 (02) : 160 - 168
  • [22] HYBRID METHOD OF MULTICRITERIA EVALUATION OF DECISION ALTERNATIVES
    Pankratova, N. D.
    Nedashkovskaya, N. I.
    CYBERNETICS AND SYSTEMS ANALYSIS, 2014, 50 (05) : 701 - 711
  • [23] GIS and multicriteria decision analysis.
    Carver, S
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2000, 14 (05) : 498 - 499
  • [24] Which statin? A multicriteria decision analysis
    Dolan, JG
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2003, 6 (03) : 326 - 326
  • [25] Multicriteria decision analysis and strategic uncertainties
    Yoe, C.
    Environmental Security in Harbors and Coastal Areas: MANAGEMENT USING COMPARATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT AND MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS, 2007, : 97 - 109
  • [26] A multicriteria decision support system for housing evaluation
    Natividade-Jesus, Eduardo
    Coutinho-Rodrigues, Joao
    Antunes, Carlos Henggeler
    DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2007, 43 (03) : 779 - 790
  • [27] Application of Multicriteria Decision Analysis in Environmental Decision Making
    Kiker, Gregory A.
    Bridges, Todd S.
    Varghese, Arun
    Seager, Thomas P.
    Linkov, Igor
    INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 1 (02) : 95 - 108
  • [28] University Employment Quality Evaluation System Based on Multicriteria Decision and Data Analysis
    Song, Longhao
    SCIENTIFIC PROGRAMMING, 2021, 2021
  • [29] Multicriteria decision analysis for the evaluation of water quality improvement and ecosystem service provision
    McInnes, Robert
    Smith, Graham
    Greaves, Julian
    Watson, David
    Wood, Nikki
    Everard, Mark
    WATER AND ENVIRONMENT JOURNAL, 2016, 30 (3-4) : 298 - 309
  • [30] Evaluation of COPD Treatments: A Multicriteria Decision Analysis of Aclidinium and Tiotropium in the United States
    Marsh, Kevin
    Zaiser, Erica
    Orfanos, Panagiotis
    Salverda, Suzanne
    Wilcox, Teresa
    Sun, Shawn
    Dixit, Shailja
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (01) : 132 - 140