Measurement properties of self-report physical activity assessment tools for patients with stroke: a systematic review

被引:18
|
作者
Martins, Julia Caetano [1 ]
Aguiar, Larissa Tavares [1 ,2 ]
Nadeau, Sylvie [2 ]
Scianni, Aline Alvim [1 ]
Teixeira-Salmela, Luci Fuscaldi [1 ]
Coelho De Morais Faria, Christina Danielli [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Dept Phys Therapy, Ave Antonio Carlos 6627,Campus Pampulha, BR-31270901 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[2] Univ Montreal UdeM, CIUSSS Ctr Sud Ile Montreal, IRGLM, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
Stroke; Physical activity; Self-report; Measurement properties; Outcome measures; FRENCHAY ACTIVITIES INDEX; OUTCOME MEASURES; BARTHEL INDEX; INSTRUMENTAL ACTIVITIES; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; EXTENDED ACTIVITIES; VALIDITY; VALIDATION; PEOPLE; RESPONSIVENESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjpt.2019.02.004
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Individuals with stroke demonstrate low levels of physical activity. Self-report measures of physical activity are frequently used and the choice of the best one to use for each purpose and context should take into account the measurement properties of these instruments. Objective: To summarize the measurement properties and clinical utility of self-report measures of physical activity of post-stroke subjects and to evaluate both the methodological quality of the studies and the quality of the measurement properties. Methods: Searches were made in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PEDro, LILACS, and SCIELO. Two reviewers independently screened studies that investigated measurement properties or clinical utility of self-report measures of physical activity in post-stroke subjects. The studies' methodological quality, quality of the measurement properties, and clinical utility were evaluated. Results: From the 11,826 identified studies, 19 were included. Six self-report tools were evaluated: The Activity card sort, Coded activity diary, Frenchay activities index (FAI), Human activity profile (HAP), Multimedia activity recall for children and adults, and the Nottingham leisure questionnaire. The methodological quality of the studies ranged from "poor'' to "good''. Most of the results regarding the quality of the measurement properties were doubtful. None of the self-report tools had their content validity investigated. The FAI and HAP showed the highest clinical utility scores. Conclusions: Content validity needs to be better investigated to determine if the instruments actually measure the physical activity domain. Further studies with good methodological quality are required to assist clinicians and researchers in selecting the best instrument to measure physical activity levels. (C) 2019 Associacao Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Fisioterapia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:476 / 490
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review
    Stéphanie A Prince
    Kristi B Adamo
    Meghan E Hamel
    Jill Hardt
    Sarah Connor Gorber
    Mark Tremblay
    International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 5
  • [22] A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review
    Prince, Stephanie A.
    Adamo, Kristi B.
    Hamel, Meghan E.
    Hardt, Jill
    Gorber, Sarah Connor
    Tremblay, Mark
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL NUTRITION AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2008, 5 (1)
  • [23] Measurement properties of assessment tools of Kinesophobia in patients with cardiovascular disease: A systematic review
    Jia, Yingying
    Cui, Nianqi
    Jia, Tingting
    Hamoudi, Hammza Jabbar Abdl Sattar
    Song, Jianping
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING SCIENCES, 2024, 11 (01) : 57 - 65
  • [24] A systematic review of the measurement properties of self-report screening tools to detect risk or exposure to child sexual abuse for children under 12
    do Bomfim, Karla Danielle Xavier
    Leite, Umbelina do Rego
    de Goes, Paulo Savio Angeiras
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (11)
  • [25] Measurement properties of self-report instruments to assess health literacy in older adults: a systematic review
    Slatyer, Susan
    Toye, Christine
    Burton, Elissa
    Jacinto, Alessandro Ferrari
    Hill, Keith D.
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 44 (11) : 2241 - 2257
  • [26] Physical activity measurement in older adults: Wearables versus self-report
    VandeBunte, Anna
    Gontrum, Eva
    Goldberger, Lauren
    Fonseca, Corrina
    Djukic, Nina
    You, Michelle
    Kramer, Joel H.
    Casaletto, Kaitlin B.
    FRONTIERS IN DIGITAL HEALTH, 2022, 4
  • [27] Self-Report Measures of Physical Activity
    Healey, Emma L.
    Allen, Kelli D.
    Bennell, Kim
    Bowden, Jocelyn L.
    Quicke, Jonathan G.
    Smith, Robert
    ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2020, 72 : 717 - 730
  • [28] A Self-Report Measure of Physical Activity
    Siegel, Donald
    Morgan, Jessica
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION RECREATION AND DANCE, 2005, 76 (07): : 11 - 11
  • [29] Self-report scales/checklists for the measurement of concussion symptoms: a systematic review
    Alla, S.
    Sullivan, S. J.
    Hale, L.
    McCrory, P.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2009, 43 : I3 - I12
  • [30] Trans-diagnostic measurement of impulsivity and compulsivity: A review of self-report tools
    Hook, Roxanne W.
    Grant, Jon E.
    Ioannidis, Konstantinos
    Tiego, Jeggan
    Yucel, Murat
    Wilkinson, Paul
    Chamberlain, Samuel R.
    NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2021, 120 : 455 - 469