Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Bipolar Fuzzy Environment

被引:95
|
作者
Alghamdi, M. A. [1 ]
Alshehri, Noura Omair [2 ]
Akram, Muhammad [3 ]
机构
[1] Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Math, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Abdulaziz Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Math, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[3] Univ Punjab, Dept Math, New Campus, Lahore, Pakistan
关键词
Bipolar fuzzy set; TOPSIS method; ELECTRE I method; TOPSIS METHOD; SETS;
D O I
10.1007/s40815-018-0499-y
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Bipolar fuzzy set theory, an extension of fuzzy set theory, deals with incomplete and vague information. The purpose of this research paper is to develop new methodologies in handling multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problems where the subjective data given by a decision maker are expressed with bipolar fuzzy information. Every alternative has a rating consists of two parts: positive and negative. The positive part represents the benefit (or satisfaction degree) and the negative part represents the cost (or dissatisfaction degree) of the alternative on the corresponding criterion. In this paper, we present bipolar fuzzy TOPSIS (BF-TOPSIS) method and bipolar fuzzy ELECTRE I (BF-ELECTRE I) method for solving MCDM problems that are equipped with bipolar fuzzy information. We illustrate our proposed methods with examples. We design algorithms of BF-TOPSIS method and BF-ELECTRE I method. We also give comparison of BF-TOPSIS method and BF-ELECTRE I method.
引用
收藏
页码:2057 / 2064
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Statistical and analytical comparison of multi-criteria decision-making techniques under fuzzy environment
    Zamani-Sabzi, Hamed
    King, James Phillip
    Gard, Charlotte C.
    Abudu, Shalamu
    [J]. OPERATIONS RESEARCH PERSPECTIVES, 2016, 3 : 92 - 117
  • [22] Cubic bipolar fuzzy Dombi averaging aggregation operators with application to multi-criteria decision-making
    Riaz, Muhammad
    Habib, Anam
    Aslam, Muhammad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2021, 41 (02) : 3373 - 3393
  • [23] A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model for trigeneration system
    Wang, Jiang-Jiang
    Jing, You-Yin
    Zhang, Chun-Fa
    Shi, Guo-Hua
    Zhang, Xu-Tao
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2008, 36 (10) : 3823 - 3832
  • [24] Stochastic multi-criteria decision-making methods based on new intuitionistic fuzzy distance
    Li, Peng
    Wu, Jun-Min
    Zhu, Jian-Jun
    [J]. Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2014, 34 (06): : 1517 - 1524
  • [25] Einstein Aggregation Operators under Bipolar Neutrosophic Environment with Applications in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Jamil, Muhammad
    Afzal, Farkhanda
    Akgul, Ali
    Abdullah, Saleem
    Maqbool, Ayesha
    Razzaque, Abdul
    Riaz, Muhammad Bilal
    Awrejcewicz, Jan
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (19):
  • [26] Structure of multi-criteria decision-making
    Brugha, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2004, 55 (11) : 1156 - 1168
  • [27] A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods for bioenergy systems
    Scott, James A.
    Ho, William
    Dey, Prasanta K.
    [J]. ENERGY, 2012, 42 (01) : 146 - 156
  • [28] Stochastic multi-criteria decision-making: an overview to methods and applications
    Celik, Erkan
    Gul, Muhammet
    Yucesan, Melih
    Mete, Suleyman
    [J]. BENI-SUEF UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF BASIC AND APPLIED SCIENCES, 2019, 8 (01)
  • [29] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Fuzzy Decision Problems: A Case Study in the Frozen Shrimp Industry
    Wang, Chia-Nan
    Nguyen, Van Thanh
    Kao, Jui-Chung
    Chen, Chih-Cheng
    Nguyen, Viet Tinh
    [J]. SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2021, 13 (03): : 1 - 18
  • [30] Comparison of fuzzy and crisp decision matrices: An evaluation on PROBID and sPROBID multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Wang, Zhiyuan
    Baydas, Mahmut
    Stevic, Zeljko
    Ozcil, Abdullah
    Irfan, Sayed Ameenuddin
    Wu, Zhe
    Rangaiah, Gade Pandu
    [J]. DEMONSTRATIO MATHEMATICA, 2023, 56 (01)