Comparison of methods of estimating coronary risk - Authors did not use latest version of Sheffield table

被引:0
|
作者
Wallis, EJ [1 ]
Ramsay, LE [1 ]
Yikona, JINM [1 ]
Jackson, PR [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Hallamshire Hosp, Sheffield S10 2JF, S Yorkshire, England
来源
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2000年 / 321卷 / 7254期
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.321.7254.175
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 176
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of concepts in easy-to-use methods for MSD risk assessment
    Roman-Liu, Danuta
    [J]. APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2014, 45 (03) : 420 - 427
  • [32] Use of mixed-treatment-comparison methods in estimating efficacy of treatments for heavy menstrual bleeding
    David C Hoaglin
    Anna Filonenko
    Mark E Glickman
    Radek Wasiak
    Risha Gidwani
    [J]. European Journal of Medical Research, 18
  • [33] Use of mixed-treatment-comparison methods in estimating efficacy of treatments for heavy menstrual bleeding
    Hoaglin, David C.
    Filonenko, Anna
    Glickman, Mark E.
    Wasiak, Radek
    Gidwani, Risha
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2013, 18
  • [34] Comparison of methods to identify individuals at increased risk of coronary disease from the general population
    Wilson, S
    Johnston, A
    Robson, J
    Poulter, N
    Collier, D
    Feder, G
    Caulfield, MJ
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 326 (7404): : 1436 - 1438B
  • [35] Comparison of Prognostic Value of Different Risk Score Methods on Outcome of Acute Coronary Syndrome
    Zhong, Bin
    Liu, Zengzhang
    Lan, Xianbin
    Chen, Yunqing
    Ling, Zhiyu
    Du, Huaan
    Yin, Yuehui
    [J]. CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 32 (08) : 434 - 438
  • [36] A COMPARISON OF 2 METHODS OF ESTIMATING A COMMON RISK DIFFERENCE IN A STRATIFIED ANALYSIS OF A MULTICENTER CLINICAL-TRIAL
    OGORMAN, TW
    WOOLSON, RF
    JONES, MP
    [J]. CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1994, 15 (02): : 135 - 153
  • [37] A COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR DIRECTLY ESTIMATING RISK RATIOS FROM COHORT OR CROSS-SECTIONAL INJURY STUDIES
    Rice, Thomas
    Troszak, Lara
    Zhu, Motao
    Smith, Gordon
    [J]. INJURY PREVENTION, 2015, 21 : A2 - A2
  • [38] A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF ESTIMATING FRACTURE RISK AND FRACTURE RISK REDUCTION IN COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSES OF THE OSTEOPOROSIS TREATMENT BAZEDOXIFENE
    Borgstrom, F.
    Coelho, J.
    Strom, O.
    McCloskey, E.
    Oden, A.
    Johansson, H.
    Kanis, J. A.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2009, 12 (03) : A67 - A67
  • [39] Risk assessment in primary prevention of coronary heart disease: randomised comparison of three scoring methods
    Isles, CG
    Ritchie, LD
    Murchie, P
    Norrie, J
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 320 (7236): : 690 - 691
  • [40] THE COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF FENTANYL USE IN THE EARLY POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD OF CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY
    Tur, H.
    Akpek, E. A.
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2011, 37 : S180 - S180