Simulation Training Improves Trainee Technical Skill and Procedural Attitudes in Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement

被引:0
|
作者
Wright, Andrew P. [1 ]
Patel, Anish H. [1 ]
Farida, Jeremy P. [2 ]
Suresh, Suraj [2 ,3 ]
Rizk, Rafat S.
Prabhu, Anoop [2 ]
机构
[1] Loma Linda Univ, Med Ctr, Div Gastroenterol, Loma Linda, CA USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Med Ctr, Div Gastroenterol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Henry Ford Hosp Hlth Syst, Div Gastroenterol, Detroit, MI USA
关键词
Percutaneous gastrostomy tube; simulation training; gastroenterology fellowship; FIDELITY;
D O I
10.1097/SIH.0000000000000580
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement remains a core competency of gastroenterology fellowship, although this procedure is performed infrequently. Some training programs lack sufficient procedural volume for trainees to develop confidence and competence in this procedure. We aimed to determine the impact of a simulation-based educational intervention on trainee technical skill and procedural attitudes in simulated PEG tube placement. Methods Gastroenterology fellows were invited to participate in the study. Baseline procedural attitudes toward PEG tube placement (self-confidence, perceived skill level, perceived level of required supervision) were assessed before simulation training using a Likert scale. Baseline technical skills were assessed by video recording-simulated PEG tube placement on a PEG tube simulator with scoring using a procedural checklist. Fellows next underwent individualized simulation training and repeated simulated PEG tube placement until greater than 90% of checklist items were achieved. Procedural attitudes were reassessed directly after the simulation. Technical skill and procedural attitudes were then reassessed 6 to 12 weeks later (delayed posttraining). Results Twelve fellows completed the study. Simulation training led to significant improvement in technical skill at delayed reassessment (52.9 +/- 14.3% vs. 78.0 +/- 8.9% correct, P = 0.0002). Simulation training also led to significant immediate improvements in self-confidence (2.1 +/- 0.7 vs. 3.1 +/- 0.3, P = 0.001), perceived skill level (2.2 +/- 1.0 vs. 4 +/- 1.1, P < 0.001), and perceived level of required supervision (2.2 +/- 0.9 vs. 3.2 +/- 0.6, P = 0.003). Conclusions Simulation training led to sustained improvements in gastroenterology fellows' technical skill and procedural attitudes in PEG tube placement. Incorporation of simulation curricula in gastroenterology fellowships for this infrequently performed procedure should be considered.
引用
收藏
页码:198 / 202
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Technical skill training improves the ability to learn
    Kurahashi, Allison M.
    Harvey, Adrian
    MacRae, Helen
    Moulton, Carol-Anne
    Dubrowski, Adam
    [J]. SURGERY, 2011, 149 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [32] Impact of upper endoscopic survey during percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement
    J.P. Regan
    B.J. Dunkin
    E.S. Cho
    J.L. Flowers
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 2002, 16 : 112 - 114
  • [33] Endoscopic Closure of GastroColoCutaneous Fistula: A Rare Complication of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement
    Zia, Hassaan
    Hayat, Maham
    Guild, Ralph
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 114 : S1061 - S1061
  • [34] NATIONAL TRENDS IN ENDOSCOPIC AND NON-ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY TUBE PLACEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES
    Bashir, Muhammad H.
    Chkhikvadze, Tamta
    Chan, Christine
    Gigauri, Nino
    Shi, Junxin
    Vignesh, Shivakumar
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 89 (06) : AB499 - AB500
  • [35] Safety of endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement compared with radiologic or surgical gastrostomy: nationwide inpatient assessment
    Kohli, Divyanshoo R.
    Kennedy, Kevin F.
    Desai, Madhav
    Sharma, Prateek
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 93 (05) : 1077 - +
  • [36] Accidental transhepatic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement with subtotal gastrectomy
    Jeong, Yeong Joo
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 93 (06) : 1425 - 1425
  • [37] External light source visualisation in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement
    Badov, D
    Lambert, JR
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1996, 43 (04) : 228 - 228
  • [38] ROUTINE POST-PROCEDURAL CLINIC VISIT AFTER ELECTIVE, OUTPATIENT PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY (PEG) TUBE PLACEMENT IS NOT NECESSARY
    Hu, Antoinette
    Kwok, Ellius J.
    Liu, Alexander T.
    Delong, Colin G.
    Reed, Michael F.
    Pauli, Eric M.
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 162 (07) : S1378 - S1378
  • [39] Utilization of an esophageal stent for subsequent placement of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube
    Seibert, DG
    Matulis, SR
    Gaskins, RD
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1997, 92 (06): : 1048 - 1050
  • [40] Lack of financial benefit of inpatient percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement
    Plonk, WM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2005, 100 (08): : 1894 - 1895