Modelling the barriers of Lean Six Sigma for Indian micro-small medium enterprises An ISM and MICMAC approach

被引:51
|
作者
Singh, Mahipal [1 ]
Kumar, Pankaj [1 ]
Rathi, Rajeev [1 ]
机构
[1] Lovely Profess Univ, Sch Mech Engn, Phagwara, India
来源
TQM JOURNAL | 2019年 / 31卷 / 05期
关键词
Lean Six Sigma; LSS barriers; Interpretive structural modelling; Indian micro-small medium enterprises; MICMAC analysis; SUCCESS FACTORS; IMPLEMENTATION; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; PERFORMANCE; ENABLERS; PROJECTS;
D O I
10.1108/TQM-12-2018-0205
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the barriers of Lean Six Sigma (LSS) and develop the interrelationship among them using interpretive structural modelling (ISM) and Matriced Impact Croises Multiplication Appliquee a un Classement (MICMAC). Design/methodology/approachUsing systematic literature review and expert's opinions, 26 LSS barriers have been extracted and finalized through statistical analysis, that is importance-index analysis and corrected item minus total correlation methods. The statistical analysis of purified 22 LSS barriers has been carried out and consistency of finalized barriers has been checked through reliability statistical test in Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software. Finally, the contextual relationship among finalized LSS barriers is developed using ISM and MICMAC approach. FindingsThe ISM model indicates that insufficient management commitment and involvement, lack of resources, lack of training and education, lack of strategic thinking, lack of training funds are strategic factors; improper project selection, poor selection of employee for belt training, lack of total employee involvement, lack of awareness of about LSS are prudent factors; unclear vision, high implementation cost, resistance to culture change, weak supplier linkage, poor alignment between company's goal and customer demand are burst factors. Furthermore, MICMAC analysis is splitting the LSSBs in four clusters according to their driving power and dependency. These results provide a clear mind-set to engineering manager for focusing more on LSS barriers according to their driving power and dependency. Research limitations/implicationsThere may be biasness in making pairwise comparison matrix of barriers due to involvement of expert's opinion as human error. Practical implicationsThe outcome of this paper provides robust practical implication for LSS researchers and practitioners. The researcher and practitioners must consciously concentrate on the identified LSSBs more conventionally during LSS implementation, and they need to plan strategically to avoid any implementation failure. Originality/valueFor successful implementation of LSS in any organization, it is necessary and permeable to make strategy for controlling LSS barriers at initial stage. So this paper is a leading attempt to highlight main LSS barriers and interrelate them using ISM and MICMAC approach. It provides a clear path for tackling LSS barriers to engineering managers, researchers and consultants.
引用
收藏
页码:673 / 695
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ISM-ANP hybrid approach to prioritize the barriers in green lean Six Sigma implementation in construction sector
    Thomas, Dain
    Khanduja, Dinesh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEAN SIX SIGMA, 2022, 13 (02) : 502 - 520
  • [32] Implementation of lean six sigma (LSS) techniques for tyre manufacturing in small and medium-sized enterprises
    Gokilakrishnan, G.
    Meenakshi, R.
    Pradeep, G. M.
    Kamalakannan, R.
    Manivelmuralidaran, V.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEM ASSURANCE ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 14 (04) : 1208 - 1217
  • [33] Implementation of continuous improvement based on Lean Six Sigma in small- and medium-sized enterprises
    Timans, Werner
    Ahaus, Kees
    van Solingen, Rini
    Kumar, Maneesh
    Antony, Jiju
    TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2016, 27 (3-4) : 309 - 324
  • [34] Implementation of lean six sigma (LSS) techniques for tyre manufacturing in small and medium-sized enterprises
    G. Gokilakrishnan
    R. Meenakshi
    G. M. Pradeep
    R. Kamalakannan
    V. Manivelmuralidaran
    International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 2023, 14 : 1208 - 1217
  • [35] Establishing a Green, Lean and Six Sigma implementation model for sustainable construction industry: an analysis of driving forces through ISM-MICMAC approach
    Kramat Hussain
    Zhen He
    Naveed Ahmad
    Muzaffar Iqbal
    Muhammad Zubair Saeed
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 30462 - 30492
  • [36] Establishing a Green, Lean and Six Sigma implementation model for sustainable construction industry: an analysis of driving forces through ISM-MICMAC approach
    Hussain, Kramat
    He, Zhen
    Ahmad, Naveed
    Iqbal, Muzaffar
    Saeed, Muhammad Zubair
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (11) : 30462 - 30492
  • [37] Modelling the barriers to online banking in the Indian scenario: an ISM approach
    Katiyar, Rajesh
    Badola, Sneha
    JOURNAL OF MODELLING IN MANAGEMENT, 2018, 13 (03) : 550 - 569
  • [38] Analyzing barriers and strategies for implementing Lean Six Sigma in the context of Indian SMEs
    Gaikwad, Sandesh Kanhu
    Paul, Ananna
    Moktadir, Md Abdul
    Paul, Sanjoy Kumar
    Chowdhury, Priyabrata
    BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2020, 27 (08) : 2365 - 2399
  • [39] Lean Six Sigma in French and Polish small and medium-sized enterprises. The pilot research results
    Grudowski, Piotr
    Wisniewska, Malgorzata
    Leseure, Ewa
    Key Engineering Materials, 2015, 637 : 1 - 6
  • [40] Evaluation of critical success factors for successful implementation of Lean Six Sigma in Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in India
    Sumant, Mandar
    Mistry, Jitendra
    Agarwal, Pallavi
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2024,