Modelling the barriers of Lean Six Sigma for Indian micro-small medium enterprises An ISM and MICMAC approach

被引:51
|
作者
Singh, Mahipal [1 ]
Kumar, Pankaj [1 ]
Rathi, Rajeev [1 ]
机构
[1] Lovely Profess Univ, Sch Mech Engn, Phagwara, India
来源
TQM JOURNAL | 2019年 / 31卷 / 05期
关键词
Lean Six Sigma; LSS barriers; Interpretive structural modelling; Indian micro-small medium enterprises; MICMAC analysis; SUCCESS FACTORS; IMPLEMENTATION; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; PERFORMANCE; ENABLERS; PROJECTS;
D O I
10.1108/TQM-12-2018-0205
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the barriers of Lean Six Sigma (LSS) and develop the interrelationship among them using interpretive structural modelling (ISM) and Matriced Impact Croises Multiplication Appliquee a un Classement (MICMAC). Design/methodology/approachUsing systematic literature review and expert's opinions, 26 LSS barriers have been extracted and finalized through statistical analysis, that is importance-index analysis and corrected item minus total correlation methods. The statistical analysis of purified 22 LSS barriers has been carried out and consistency of finalized barriers has been checked through reliability statistical test in Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software. Finally, the contextual relationship among finalized LSS barriers is developed using ISM and MICMAC approach. FindingsThe ISM model indicates that insufficient management commitment and involvement, lack of resources, lack of training and education, lack of strategic thinking, lack of training funds are strategic factors; improper project selection, poor selection of employee for belt training, lack of total employee involvement, lack of awareness of about LSS are prudent factors; unclear vision, high implementation cost, resistance to culture change, weak supplier linkage, poor alignment between company's goal and customer demand are burst factors. Furthermore, MICMAC analysis is splitting the LSSBs in four clusters according to their driving power and dependency. These results provide a clear mind-set to engineering manager for focusing more on LSS barriers according to their driving power and dependency. Research limitations/implicationsThere may be biasness in making pairwise comparison matrix of barriers due to involvement of expert's opinion as human error. Practical implicationsThe outcome of this paper provides robust practical implication for LSS researchers and practitioners. The researcher and practitioners must consciously concentrate on the identified LSSBs more conventionally during LSS implementation, and they need to plan strategically to avoid any implementation failure. Originality/valueFor successful implementation of LSS in any organization, it is necessary and permeable to make strategy for controlling LSS barriers at initial stage. So this paper is a leading attempt to highlight main LSS barriers and interrelate them using ISM and MICMAC approach. It provides a clear path for tackling LSS barriers to engineering managers, researchers and consultants.
引用
收藏
页码:673 / 695
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Investigation and modelling lean six sigma barriers in service industries: a hybrid ISM-Fuzzy MICMAC approach
    Abu-Salim, Taghreed Y.
    Agarwal, Puneet
    Abu Elrub, Eman
    Haoum, Linda
    Almashgari, Maryam Hasan
    [J]. MEASURING BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2023, 27 (03) : 379 - 402
  • [2] Identification and investigation into the barriers to Green Lean Six Sigma implementation: a micro small and medium enterprises perspective
    Mohan, Jag
    Kaswan, Mahender Singh
    Rathi, Rajeev
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTERACTIVE DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING - IJIDEM, 2023, 18 (08): : 6161 - 6175
  • [3] Lean Six Sigma competitiveness for micro, small and medium enterprises (MSME): an action research in the Indian context
    Bhat, Shreeranga
    Gijo, E., V
    Rego, Anil Melwyn
    Bhat, Vinayambika S.
    [J]. TQM JOURNAL, 2021, 33 (02): : 379 - 406
  • [4] ISM and Fuzzy MICMAC application for analysis of Lean Six Sigma barriers with environmental considerations
    Ben Ruben, R.
    Vinodh, S.
    Asokan, P.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEAN SIX SIGMA, 2018, 9 (01) : 64 - 90
  • [5] Barriers in green lean six sigma product development process: an ISM approach
    Kumar, Sanjay
    Luthra, Sunil
    Govindan, Kannan
    Kumar, Naveen
    Haleem, Abid
    [J]. PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2016, 27 (7-8) : 604 - 620
  • [6] Study on Lean Six Sigma Applied in Small and Medium Sized Enterprises
    Shi Guohong
    Li Linsheng
    Huang Houqing
    [J]. SYSTEM MANAGEMENT AND INFORMATIONIZATION OF CHINA SME: THEORY & PRACTICE, 2011, : 27 - 31
  • [7] Lean Six Sigma for small and medium sized enterprises: a practical guide
    Perini, Alessandro
    [J]. PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2017, 28 (04) : 350 - 350
  • [8] Investigation and modeling of lean six sigma barriers in small and medium-sized industries using hybrid ISM-SEM approach
    Singh, Mahipal
    Rathi, Rajeev
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEAN SIX SIGMA, 2021, 12 (06) : 1115 - 1145
  • [9] Roadblocks in Integrating Lean Six Sigma and Industry 4.0 in Small and Medium Enterprises
    Alsaadi, Naif
    [J]. SYSTEMS, 2024, 12 (04):
  • [10] Profit enhancement for small, medium scale enterprises using Lean Six Sigma
    Kharub, Manjeet
    Ruchitha, Bandi
    Hariharan, Shashank
    Vamsi, N. Shanmukha
    [J]. MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2022, 56 : 2591 - 2595