The influence of root diffusate and host age on hatching of the root-knot nematodes, Meloidogyne chitwoodi and M-fallax

被引:28
|
作者
Wesemael, Wim M. L.
Perry, Roland N.
Moens, Maurice
机构
[1] Inst Agr & Fisheries Res, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
[2] Rothamsted Res, Plant Pathogens Interact Div, Nematode Interact Unit, Harpenden AL5 2JQ, Herts, England
[3] Univ Ghent, Lab Agrozool, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
diapause; dormancy; hatching response; quiescence; survival;
D O I
10.1163/156854106779799204
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
The root-knot nematodes, Meloidogyne chitwoodi and M. fallax, cause severe damage to economically important crops and, in 1998, both species were listed as quarantine pests in Europe. Comparative studies were made on the effects of root diffusates and host age on the in vitro hatching of M. chitwoodi and M. fallax. There is a marked contrast in the hatching response of the two species. Hatching of second-stage juveniles (J2) of M. chitwoodi produced on young plants did not require host root diffusate stimulus, whereas at the end of the plant growing season, egg masses contained a percentage of unhatched J2 that require host root diffusate to cause hatch. This form of obligate quiescence at the end of the host growing season was not found in M. fallax. This species hatched well in water and did not require hatch stimulation from root diffusate, irrespective of the age of the plant on which the egg masses were produced. The number of eggs per egg mass for M.,fallax collected on senescing plants was significantly greater than the number of eggs per egg mass for M. chitwoodi. The number of eggs per egg mass of M. chitwoodi decreased with plant age. The results are discussed in the context of the differing survival strategies of the two species.
引用
收藏
页码:895 / 902
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Resistance to the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne fallax in Solanum sparsipilum:: analysis of the mechanisms
    Kouassi, AB
    Kerlan, MC
    Sobczak, M
    Dantec, JP
    Rouaux, C
    Ellissèche, D
    Mugniéry, D
    NEMATOLOGY, 2004, 6 : 389 - 400
  • [42] Manipulation of host gene expression by root-knot nematodes
    Bird, DM
    JOURNAL OF PARASITOLOGY, 1996, 82 (06) : 881 - 888
  • [43] A CULTURE UNIT FOR ANALYSIS OF HOST-PARASITE RELATIONSHIPS ROOT-KNOT NEMATODES (MELOIDOGYNE SP)
    DROPKIN, VH
    NEMATOLOGICA, 1966, 12 (01): : 89 - &
  • [44] Host reactions of sweetpotato genotypes to root-knot nematodes and variation in virulence of Meloidogyne incognita populations
    Cervantes-Flores, JC
    Yencho, GC
    Davis, EL
    HORTSCIENCE, 2002, 37 (07) : 1112 - 1116
  • [45] Host plant status and damage threshold of spinach (Spinacia oleracea) for the temperate root-knot nematode Meloidogyne chitwoodi
    Taning, Lirette M.
    Chann, Leakena
    Fleerakkers, Sander
    Cap, Nathalie
    Formesyn, Ellen
    Tirry, Luc
    Wesemael, Wim M. L.
    NEMATOLOGY, 2023, 25 (01) : 77 - 89
  • [46] DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ITS REGIONS OF ISOLATES OF ROOT-KNOT NEMATODES MELIODOGYNE HAPLA AND M-CHITWOODI
    ZIJLSTRA, C
    LEVER, AEM
    UENK, BJ
    VANSILFHOUT, CH
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1995, 85 (10) : 1231 - 1237
  • [47] The threat of root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) in Africa: a review
    Onkendi, E. M.
    Kariuki, G. M.
    Marais, M.
    Moleleki, L. N.
    PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2014, 63 (04) : 727 - 737
  • [48] Resistance to root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne species) in grape rootstock germplasm
    不详
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ENOLOGY AND VITICULTURE, 2005, 56 (03): : 293A - 294A
  • [50] DETERMINATION OF RACES OF ROOT-KNOT NEMATODES (MELOIDOGYNE SPP.) IN TURKEY
    Kacar, G.
    Elekcioglu, I. H.
    JOURNAL OF NEMATOLOGY, 2014, 46 (02) : 181 - 181