The masking-level difference in low-noise noise

被引:24
|
作者
Hall, JW [1 ]
Grose, JH
Hartmann, WM
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Sch Med, Div Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1121/1.422778
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
In experiment 1 NoSo and NoS pi thresholds for a 500-Hz pure tone were obtained in a low-fluctuation masking noise and a high-fluctuation masking noise for six normal-hearing listeners. The noise bandwidth was 10 Hz. In agreement with previous investigations, the NoSo thresholds were lower in low-fluctuation noise than in high-fluctuation noise. For three listeners, NoS pi thresholds were similar for the two types of noise, while for the other three Listeners, NoS pi thresholds were higher for low-fluctuation noise than for high-fluctuation noise. In experiment 2, the masker was created by amplitude modulating a 500-Hz pure tone by a 0-10-Hz low-pass noise. The degree of masker fluctuation was controlled by adjusting the average modulation depth (100%, 63%, 40%, and 25%). The signal was a 10-Hz-wide noise centered on 500 Hz. Results were similar to those of experiment I: for the NoSo conditions, signal detection improved with decreasing degree of fluctuation, and for NoS pi conditions, the results were subject dependent. For three Listeners, NoS pi thresholds were again similar in the two types of noise, while for the other three listeners, NoS pi thresholds were again higher in low-fluctuation noise than in high-fluctuation noise. The results showed that a high degree of masker fluctuation sometimes facilitates NoS pi detection. It is possible that the binaural detection mechanism utilizes the relatively good signal-to-noise ratios that occur in the low power or "dip" regions of fluctuating masker waveforms. (C) 1998 Acoustical Society of America.
引用
收藏
页码:2573 / 2577
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] BINAURAL AMPLITUDE DISCRIMINATION AND THE BINAURAL MASKING-LEVEL DIFFERENCE
    HENNING, GB
    HEARING RESEARCH, 1991, 55 (02) : 188 - 194
  • [32] DIFFERENTIATION OF TYPES OF PRESBYCUSIS USING THE MASKING-LEVEL DIFFERENCE
    NOVAK, RE
    ANDERSON, CV
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1982, 25 (04): : 504 - 508
  • [33] The Binaural Masking-Level Difference of Mandarin Tone Detection and the Binaural Intelligibility-Level Difference of Mandarin Tone Recognition in the Presence of Speech-Spectrum Noise
    Ho, Cheng-Yu
    Li, Pei-Chun
    Chiang, Yuan-Chuan
    Young, Shuenn-Tsong
    Chu, Woei-Chyn
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (04):
  • [34] The normalized interaural correlation:: Accounting for NoSπ thresholds obtained with Gaussian and "low-noise" masking noise
    Bernstein, LR
    van de Par, S
    Trahiotis, C
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1999, 106 (02): : 870 - 876
  • [35] Fully Differential Difference Amplifier for Low-Noise Applications
    Arbet, Daniel
    Nagy, Gabriel
    Kovac, Martin
    Stopjakova, Viera
    2015 IEEE 18TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON DESIGN AND DIAGNOSTICS OF ELECTRONIC CIRCUITS & SYSTEMS (DDECS 2015), 2015, : 57 - 62
  • [36] The effect of diotic and dichotic level-randomization on the binaural masking-level difference
    Henning, GB
    Richards, VM
    Lentz, JJ
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2005, 118 (05): : 3229 - 3240
  • [37] LOW-NOISE AMPLIFIER
    WALLMAN, H
    MACNEE, AB
    GADSDEN, CP
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTE OF RADIO ENGINEERS, 1948, 36 (03): : 370 - 370
  • [38] Low-noise chains
    Anon
    Machine Design, 2002, 74 (10)
  • [39] EFFECTS OF NOISE BANDWIDTH ON THE LATE-POTENTIAL MASKING LEVEL DIFFERENCE
    FOWLER, CG
    MIKAMI, CM
    ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1992, 84 (02): : 157 - 163
  • [40] LOW-NOISE PREAMPLIFIER
    LEONTEV, GE
    ARMONAVICHYUS, VP
    MIKOLAITIS, GS
    INSTRUMENTS AND EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUES, 1984, 27 (01) : 139 - 140