Emergency cervical cerclage: A study between duration of cerclage in situ with gestation at cerclage, herniation of forewater, and cervical dilatation at presentation

被引:29
|
作者
Yip, SK [1 ]
Fung, HYM [1 ]
Fung, TY [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Prince Wales Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Shatin, Hong Kong
关键词
emergency cervical cerclage; gestation; herniation of forewater; pregnancy outcome;
D O I
10.1016/S0301-2115(98)00023-2
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of emergency cerclage in prolonging pregnancy and its effect on pregnancy outcome in patients with cervical incompetence. Study Design: Retrospective review of patients who had emergency cervical cerclage performed for cervical incompetence. 19 patients between 16 and 30 weeks' gestation with (1) cervical effacement, (2) cervical dilatation of at least cm, (3) herniation of intact fetal membranes through the cervical os, (4) absence of established labor, and (5) absence of clinical evidence of infection were studied. The duration of cerclage in situ, gestation at delivery and birth weight were analyzed. Results: The mean duration of cerclage in situ was 47.5+/-48.6 days. The mean gestation at delivery was 30.5+/-6.6 weeks and the mean birth weight was 1730+/-1105 grams. The duration of cerclage in situ was significantly longer when the procedure was performed at or before 20 weeks' gestation (Mann-Whitney U test, P<0.02), or when there had been no herniation of forewater (HFW) at the time of presentation (Mann-Whitney U rest, P<0.05). Conclusions: Gestation at cerclage and the presence of herniation of forewater (HFW) at presentation of cervical incompetence significantly affect the duration of emergency cerclage in situ. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 67
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Emergency cervical cerclage. Is there a role for amnioreduction?
    Cerqui, AJ
    Olive, E
    Bennett, MJ
    Challis, D
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 1999, 39 (02): : 155 - 158
  • [22] Emergency cervical cerclage training: A simple simulator
    Kotlinska, M.
    Merrick, K.
    Rajesh, U.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 123 : 214 - 214
  • [23] Emergency cervical cerclage: A review of 15 cases
    Al-Takroni, AMB
    Aslam, A
    Parvathi, CK
    Shamdeen, M
    Hanbali, M
    Ahmed, MS
    Khatun, A
    Ali, AM
    Mendis, KBL
    [J]. ANNALS OF SAUDI MEDICINE, 1999, 19 (01) : 23 - 26
  • [24] Balloon tamponade for successful emergency cervical cerclage
    Lv, Min
    Zhao, Baihui
    Chen, Yuan
    Xi, Fangfang
    Zhan, Qitao
    Wang, Yayun
    Pu, Yuqun
    Luo, Qiong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2020, 46 (03) : 418 - 424
  • [26] Emergency cerclage in singleton pregnancies with painless cervical dilatation: A meta-analysis
    Chatzakis, Christos
    Efthymiou, Athina
    Sotiriadis, Alexandros
    Makrydimas, George
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2020, 99 (11) : 1444 - 1457
  • [27] Emergency cerclage - A successful challenge despite advanced second trimester cervical dilatation
    Soliman, KB
    Abbas, MM
    Aref, NK
    Zada, ZM
    [J]. SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 27 (04) : 544 - 546
  • [28] An extraordinary complication of emergency cervical cerclage in a 20 weeks' gestation: cervicoisthmic rupture
    Aydin, T.
    Yucel, B.
    Cinar, E.
    Aksoy, H.
    Aksoy, U.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 35 (08) : 849 - +
  • [29] Management of painless mid-trimester cervical dilatation: Prophylactic vs emergency placement of cervical cerclage
    Ventolini, G.
    Neiger, R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2008, 28 (01) : 24 - 27
  • [30] Does amnioreduction increase success of emergency cervical cerclage in cases with advanced cervical dilatation and protruding membranes?
    Cakiroglu, Y.
    Doger, E.
    Kopuk, S. Yildirim
    Gunlemez, A.
    Oguz, D.
    Caliskan, E.
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 43 (05): : 708 - 712