Radiography, Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Craniofacial Structures in Pig

被引:14
|
作者
Kyllar, M. [1 ]
Stembirek, J. [2 ,3 ]
Putnova, I. [1 ]
Stehlik, L. [4 ]
Odehnalova, S. [5 ]
Buchtova, M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vet & Pharmaceut Sci Brno, Dept Anat & Histol & Embryol, Fac Vet Med, Brno 61242, Czech Republic
[2] Acad Sci Czech Republ, Inst Anim Physiol & Genet, Vvi, Brno 60200, Czech Republic
[3] Univ Hosp Ostrava, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Ostrava 70852, Czech Republic
[4] Univ Vet & Pharmaceut Sci Brno, Dept Diagnost Imaging, Small Anim Clin, Fac Vet Med, Brno 61242, Czech Republic
[5] Sevaron Sro, Brno 61200, Czech Republic
关键词
DENTAL IMPLANTS; NASAL CAVITY; ANIMAL-MODEL; IN-VITRO; SWINE; DIAGNOSIS; IMMEDIATE; MINIPIGS; DELIVERY; MAXILLAE;
D O I
10.1111/ahe.12095
中图分类号
R602 [外科病理学、解剖学]; R32 [人体形态学];
学科分类号
100101 ;
摘要
The pig has recently become popular as a large animal experimental model in many fields of biomedical research. The aim of this study is to evaluate the basic anatomical structures in the head region of the pig to lay the groundwork for its practical clinical usage or pre-clinical research in the future. We used three different diagnostic imaging methods: radiography, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The analysis showed that radiographic imaging is suitable only for general evaluation of the facial area of the pig skull. CT images showed excellent spatial definition of bony structures of the whole craniofacial area, and MRI images revealed fine soft tissue details. Radiography is preferentially suited to general assessment of bone structures of the facial skeleton; however, the thick layer of adipose tissue in the craniofacial region of the pig makes the imaging of some parts difficult or even impossible. CT is useful for revealing morphological details of mineralized tissues, whereas MRI is more suitable for soft tissue analysis and the detection of subtle pathologic changes in both bone and soft tissues. Therefore, before using pigs as an experimental model in craniofacial research, it is necessary to evaluate the suitability and disadvantages of potential imaging methods and how appropriate they are for accurate visualization of desired structures.
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 452
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the equine head
    Tucker, RL
    Farrell, E
    VETERINARY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA-EQUINE PRACTICE, 2001, 17 (01) : 131 - +
  • [42] Determinants of the diffusion of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging
    Oh, EH
    Imanaka, Y
    Evans, E
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2005, 21 (01) : 73 - 80
  • [43] Coronary angiography by magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography
    Dewey, M
    Taupitz, M
    DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2003, 128 (1-2) : 33 - 35
  • [44] Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of colonic diseases
    Scharitzer, Martina
    Lampichler, Katharina
    Popp, Sabine
    Mang, Thomas
    RADIOLOGIE, 2023, 63 (06): : 441 - 450
  • [45] Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in pancreatic cancer
    Friedrich, JM
    DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURES IN PANCREATIC DISEASE, 1997, : 349 - 357
  • [46] Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Bone Tumors
    Ladd, Lauren M.
    Roth, Trenton D.
    SEMINARS IN ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 52 (04) : 209 - 226
  • [47] Rebalancing the risks of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance imaging
    S. Bruce Greenberg
    Pediatric Radiology, 2011, 41 : 951 - 952
  • [48] The basic principles of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging
    Caldemeyer, KS
    Buckwalter, KA
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1999, 41 (05) : 768 - 771
  • [49] COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY AND MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING
    BEST, J
    PRACTITIONER, 1986, 230 (1412) : 161 - 164
  • [50] Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography of Respiratory Mechanics
    Biederer, Jurgen
    Hintze, Christian
    Fabel, Michael
    Dinkel, Julien
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2010, 32 (06) : 1388 - 1397