Profiles of teachers' general pedagogical knowledge: nature, causes and effects on beliefs and instructional quality

被引:6
|
作者
Nehls, Caroline [1 ]
Koenig, Johannes [1 ]
Kaiser, Gabriele [2 ,3 ]
Blomeke, Sigrid [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cologne, Fac Human Sci, Dept Educ & Social Sci, Gronewaldstr 2a, D-50931 Cologne, Germany
[2] Univ Hamburg, Fac Educ, Math Educ, Alsterterrasse 1, D-20354 Hamburg, Germany
[3] Australian Catholic Univ, Learning Sci Inst, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[4] Univ Oslo, Ctr Educ Measurement CEMO, Gaustadalleen 30D, N-0373 Oslo, Norway
来源
ZDM-MATHEMATICS EDUCATION | 2020年 / 52卷 / 02期
关键词
General pedagogical knowledge; In-service teachers; Knowledge profiles; Opportunities to learn; Teacher beliefs; Instructional quality; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT; FUTURE TEACHERS; LATENT CLASSES; SELF-EFFICACY; RASCH MODELS; EDUCATION; FOUNDATIONS; HETEROGENEITY; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1007/s11858-019-01102-3
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The aim of the research described in this paper was to identify qualitatively different profiles of teachers' general pedagogical knowledge (GPK) as a central component of their competence. We applied a mixed Rasch model to a sample of 462 mathematics and non-mathematics teachers who were tested using a short version of the TEDS-M test for GPK. The analysis revealed two profiles that were characterized by (quantitative) differences in their overall GPK level as well as (qualitative) differences in how well these groups did on specific items. The profiles differed mainly on items dealing with adaptivity, notably on a set related to Bruner's modes of representation. A person-focused comparison of the profiles showed that teachers who had undergone training for teaching mathematics had a higher chance of belonging to the profile with strength on these and other adaptivity items. The profiles were validated against teachers' beliefs and their instructional quality. The results showed that the two groups differed significantly in their epistemological as well as teaching and learning beliefs. Moreover, they differed significantly in the cognitive activation level of their instruction.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 357
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条