Improved pre-hospital care efficiency due to the implementation of pre-hospital trauma life support (PHTLS®) algorithms

被引:16
|
作者
Teuben, Michel [1 ]
Lohr, Nikolaus [2 ]
Jensen, Kai Oliver [1 ]
Bruesch, Martin [3 ]
Muller, Stephan [4 ]
Pfeifer, Roman [1 ]
Mica, Ladislav [1 ]
Pape, Hans-Christoph [1 ]
Sprengel, Kai [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Zurich, Dept Traumatol, Raemistr 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Hosp Zurich, Inst Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Raemistr 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Hosp Zurich, Inst Anesthesiol, Raemistr 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Schutz & Rettung, City Zurich, Neumuehlequai 40, CH-8021 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Pre-hospital care; PHTLS; Polytrauma; Efficiency;
D O I
10.1007/s00068-019-01141-1
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Purpose Pre-hospital trauma life support (PHTLS (R)) includes a standardized algorithm for pre-hospital care. Implementation of PHTLS (R) led to improved outcome in less developed medical trauma systems. We aimed to determine the impact of PHTLS (R) on quality of pre-hospital care in a European metropolitan area. We hypothesized that the introduction of PHTLS (R) was associated with improved efficiency of pre-hospital care for severely injured patients and less emergency physician deployment. Methods We included adult polytrauma (ISS>15) patients that were admitted to our level one trauma center during a 7-year time period. Patients were grouped based on the presence or absence of a PHTLS (R)-trained paramedic in the pre-hospital trauma team. Group I (no-PHTLS group) included all casualties treated by no-PHTLS (R)-trained personnel. Group II (PHTLS group) was composed of casualties managed by a PHTLS (R) qualified team. We compared outcome between groups. Results During the study period, 187,839 rescue operations were executed and 280 patients were included. No differences were seen in patient characteristics, trauma severity or geographical distances between groups. Transfer times were significantly reduced in PHTLS (R) teams than non-qualified teams (9.3 vs. 10.5 min, P=0.006). Furthermore, the in-field operation times were significantly reduced in PHTLS (R) qualified teams (36.2 vs. 42.6 min, P=0.003). Emergency physician involvement did not differ between groups. Conclusion This is the first study to show that the implementation of PHTLS (R) algorithms in a European metropolitan area is associated with improved efficiency of pre-hospital care for the severely injured. We therefore recommend considering the introduction of PHTLS (R) in metropolitan areas in the first world.
引用
收藏
页码:1321 / 1325
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Pre-hospital care
    Vincent, R
    KEY ADVANCES IN THE EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION, 1999, : 5 - 11
  • [12] Anaesthetic priorities in pre-hospital trauma care
    Youngs, Paul
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2008, 9 (09): : 384 - 386
  • [13] Anaesthetic priorities in pre-hospital trauma care
    Docherty, Phil
    Mellor, Adrian
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2014, 15 (09): : 397 - 401
  • [14] Pre-hospital trauma care: systems and delivery
    Lockey, David
    Deakin, Charles D.
    BJA EDUCATION, 2005, 5 (06) : 191 - 194
  • [15] Anaesthetic priorities in pre-hospital trauma care
    Forrest, Mark
    van der Velde, Jason
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2005, 6 (09): : 303 - +
  • [16] Research questions in pre-hospital trauma care
    Lockey, David J.
    PLOS MEDICINE, 2017, 14 (07):
  • [17] Anaesthetic priorities in pre-hospital trauma care
    Fadden, Sarah
    Prior, Kate
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 21 (08): : 381 - 386
  • [18] PRE-HOSPITAL TRAUMA MANAGEMENT
    FAHEY, M
    NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1978, 87 (604) : 54 - 58
  • [19] Anaesthetic priorities in pre-hospital trauma care
    Webster, Brett
    Mellor, Adrian
    Smith, Dean
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2011, 12 (09): : 377 - 379
  • [20] IS ALS NECESSARY FOR PRE-HOSPITAL TRAUMA CARE
    TRUNKEY, DD
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1984, 24 (01): : 86 - 87