Robotic mitral valve repair: Experience with the da Vinci system

被引:139
|
作者
Nifong, LW
Chu, VF
Bailey, BM
Maziarz, DM
Sorrell, VL
Holbert, D
Chitwood, WR
机构
[1] E Carolina Univ, Dept Surg, Brody Sch Med, Greenville, NC 27858 USA
[2] E Carolina Univ, Ctr Minimally Invas & Robot Surg, Brody Sch Med, Greenville, NC 27858 USA
[3] E Carolina Univ, Med Ctr, Brody Sch Med, Greenville, NC 27858 USA
[4] E Carolina Univ, Ctr Stat, Brody Sch Med, Greenville, NC 27858 USA
来源
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY | 2003年 / 75卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0003-4975(02)04554-X
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. As part of a Food and Drug Administration trial, mitral repairs were performed in 38 patients using the robotic da Vinci surgical system (Intuitive Surgical, Inc, Mountain View, CA). Prospectively, we evaluated safety and efficacy in performing both simple and complex mitral repairs. Methods. Eligible patients had nonischemic moderate to severe mitral insufficiency. Operative techniques included peripheral cardiopulmonary perfusion, a 4- to 5-cm mini-thoracotomy, transthoracic aortic occlusion, and antegrade blood cardioplegia. Transesophageal echocardiograrns were done intraoperatively with three-dimensional reconstructions. Successful repairs were defined as mild or less residual regurgitation. Results. Enhanced three-dimensional visualization of mitral leaflets and the subvalvar apparatus allowed safe, dexterous intracardiac tissue manipulation. All patients had successful valve repairs including quadrangular resections, sliding plasties, and edge-to-edge approximations, as well as both chordal transfers and replacements. There were no operative deaths, strokes, or device- related complications. One patient required valve replacement for hemolysis and 1 was reexplored for bleeding. There were no incisional conversions. Both robotic repair and total operating times decreased significantly from 1.9 +/- 0.1 and 5.1 +/- 0.1 hours (mean standard error of the mean) for the first 19 patients to 1.5 +/- 0.1 (p = 0.002) and 4.4 +/- 0.1 hours (p = 0.04) for the last 19 operations, respectively. Total hospital length of stay for patients was 3.8 +/- 0.6 days. Of all patients, 31 (82%) had a 4-day or less length of stay. Seven patients (18%) had stays between 5 and 9 days (6.4 +/- 1.0). Conclusions. This study shows that the da Vinci surgical system (Intuitive Surgical, Inc) has few limitations in performing complex valve repairs. Articulated wrist-like instruments and three-dimensional visualization enabled precise tissue telernanipulation. Future robotic design advances and adjunctive suture technologies may promote continuing evolution of robotic cardiac operations. (C) 2003 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:438 / 442
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Early experience with robotic mitral valve repair with intra-aortic occlusion
    Kesavuori, Risto
    Raivio, Peter
    Jokinen, Janne J.
    Sahlman, Antero
    Teittinen, Kari
    Vento, Antti
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 155 (04): : 1463 - 1471
  • [42] Concomitant Atrial Septal Defect Closure and Tricuspid Repair Using the da Vinci Robotic System
    Onan, Burak
    Guden, Mustafa
    Bakir, Ihsan
    ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2014, 38 (10) : 903 - U134
  • [43] Robotic Transaxillary Hemithyroidectomy Using the da Vinci SP Robotic System: Initial Experience With 10 Consecutive Cases
    Kim, Kwangsoon
    Kang, Sang-Wook
    Kim, Jin Kyong
    Lee, Cho Rok
    Lee, Jandee
    Jeong, Jong Ju
    Nam, Kee-Hyun
    Chung, Woong Youn
    SURGICAL INNOVATION, 2020, 27 (03) : 256 - 264
  • [44] The periareolar approach to robotic mitral valve repair
    Musumeci, Francesco
    Ranocchi, Federico
    Lio, Antonio
    ANNALS OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2022, : 548 - 549
  • [45] Robotic mitral valve repair: The steps to success
    Mick, Stephanie L.
    Kohlbacher, Brian
    Gillinov, A. Marc
    JTCVS TECHNIQUES, 2023, 22 : 49 - 52
  • [46] Is robotic mitral valve repair a reproducible approach?
    Cheng, Wen
    Fontana, Gregory P.
    De Robertis, Michele A.
    Mirocha, James
    Czer, Lawrence S. C.
    Kass, Robert M.
    Trento, Alfredo
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 139 (03): : 628 - 633
  • [47] Is a Robotic Operation Safe for Mitral Valve Repair?
    Cao, Christopher
    Virk, Sohaib
    Wolfenden, Hugh
    Yan, Tristan
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2015, 100 (06): : 2416 - 2416
  • [48] Robotic mitral valve repair: algorithmic approach in degenerative mitral valve disease
    Javadikasgari, Hoda
    Suri, Rakesh M.
    Gillinov, A. Marc
    ANNALS OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2016, 5 (06) : 586 - 588
  • [49] Robotic mitral valve repair in infective endocarditis
    Chi, Nai-Hsin
    Huang, Chi-Hsiang
    Huang, Shu-Chien
    Yu, Hsi-Yu
    Chen, Yih-Sharng
    Wang, Shoei-Shen
    Wu, I-Hui
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2014, 6 (01) : 56 - 60
  • [50] Mitral valve repair robotic versus sternotomy
    Folliguet, T
    Vanhuyse, F
    Constantino, X
    Realli, M
    Laborde, F
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2006, 29 (03) : 362 - 366