Carcinoid Tumors of the Orbit and Ocular Adnexa

被引:7
|
作者
Mustak, Hamzah [1 ]
Liu, Wenjing [1 ]
Murta, Fabiola [2 ]
Ozgur, Omar [3 ]
Couch, Steven [4 ]
Garrity, James [5 ]
Shinder, Roman [6 ]
Kazim, Michael [7 ]
Callahan, Alison [8 ]
Hayek, Brent [9 ]
Kim, HeeJoon [9 ]
Yu, Fei [1 ]
Esmaeli, Bita [10 ]
Rose, Geoffrey [2 ]
Rootman, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Stein Eye Inst, Div Orbital & Ophthalm Plast Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Moorfields Eye Hosp, London, England
[3] Adv Eye Med Grp, Mission Viejo, CA USA
[4] Washington Univ, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Dept Ophthalmol, Rochester, MN USA
[6] Suny Downstate Med Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol, Brooklyn, NY 11203 USA
[7] Columbia Univ Coll Phys & Surg, Dept Ophthalmol, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 USA
[8] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[9] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[10] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Plast Surg, Houston, TX 77030 USA
来源
关键词
NEUROENDOCRINE CARCINOMA; CHOROIDAL METASTASIS; CLINICAL-FEATURES; EYE; MUSCLE; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1097/IOP.0000000000001715
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: Well-differentiated neuroendocrine or carcinoid tumors are found most commonly in the gastrointestinal tract. When metastatic to the orbit, they tend to have a propensity for the extraocular muscles. The purpose of this study was to better understand the diversity in presentation of orbital carcinoid disease and to determine predictors for survival. Methods: In this observational cross-sectional cohort study, data from 8 tertiary orbital practices were compiled. Demographic, clinical, pathologic, American Joint Committee on Cancer stage and grade, imaging, and management data were extracted for all the patients. Descriptive statistics were calculated. Subgroups were compared utilizing analysis of variance analyses and Kaplan-Meier curves. Time to progression and disease-specific and overall mortality were calculated. Comparisons were performed for the following a priori pairs: unknown versus known primary tumor, single versus multiple extraocular muscle involvement, unilateral versus bilateral orbital disease, extraocular muscle versus other orbital involvement, and excisional versus incisional surgery. Results: A total of 28 patients with carcinoid tumors of the orbit were identified. Of these, 57.1% of patients were female, the mean age at diagnosis of the primary tumor was 58.8 years and the mean age at diagnosis of orbital disease was 62.6 years. At primary presentation, all patients were American Joint Committee on Cancer stage III or IV and 21.4% demonstrated carcinoid syndrome. Muscle involvement was noted in 78.6% of patients, and of these, 72% were noted to have single muscle disease. Eight patients had no primary tumor identified; 3 of these 8 demonstrated disseminated disease at the time of diagnosis. The overall 5-year survival rate was 81.8% from diagnosis of primary tumor and 50% from diagnosis of orbital disease. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with unilateral orbital disease when compared with bilateral orbital disease had a longer progression-free survival and time to death from all causes (p = 0.025). Patients with disease localized to the orbit at presentation had longer time to death than those with disseminated disease. Treatment with surgery, radiation, or octreotide did not appear to affect survival. Patients managed with systemic chemotherapy had a shorter time of survival than the rest of the group. All other subgroup comparisons were not found to be statistically significant. Conclusions: Neuroendocrine tumors of the orbit represent a wide spectrum of disease, with some cases being part of disseminated disease, while others being localized presentations. This heterogeneity may be responsible for the slightly higher overall survival in these patients than others with metastatic carcinoid tumors in other locations.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 225
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] CARCINOMA OF THE ORBIT AND ADNEXA
    BENEDICT, WL
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1952, 50 : 77 - 86
  • [32] LYMPHOMA OF THE OCULAR ADNEXA
    RODRIGUEZ, JN
    CANAVATE, M
    AMIAN, A
    MUNIZ, R
    PRADOS, D
    REVISTA CLINICA ESPANOLA, 1994, 194 (10): : 913 - 915
  • [33] Lymphoma of the ocular adnexa
    Kakkassery, V.
    Stuebiger, N.
    Adamietz, I. A.
    Tischoff, I.
    Baraniskin, A.
    Wunderlich, I. M.
    OPHTHALMOLOGE, 2015, 112 (03): : 210 - 216
  • [34] Sarcoidosis of the ocular adnexa
    Mukherjee, Bipasha
    Ambreen, Asra
    Alam, Md. Shahid
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2017, 118 (04) : 512 - 513
  • [35] Lymphoma of the Ocular Adnexa
    Frimmel, S. A. F.
    Kniestedt, C.
    Toeteberg-Harms, M.
    Chaloupka, K.
    KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 2014, 231 (04) : 394 - 404
  • [36] KERATOACANTHOMA OF THE OCULAR ADNEXA
    CHRISTENSEN, L
    FITZPATRICK, TB
    ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1955, 53 (06) : 857 - 859
  • [37] Adult xanthogranulomatous disease of the orbit and ocular adnexa: new immunohistochemical findings and clinical review
    Sivak-Callcott, JA
    Rootman, J
    Rasmussen, SL
    Nugent, RA
    White, VA
    Paridaens, D
    Currie, Z
    Rose, G
    Clark, B
    McNab, AA
    Buffam, FV
    Neigel, JM
    Kazim, M
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2006, 90 (05) : 602 - 608
  • [38] Fine needle aspiration of the orbit and ocular adnexa.: A retrospective study of 59 cases
    Fonseca, RR
    Cabral, J
    Mendonça, E
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2005, 18 : 65A - 65A
  • [39] Fine needle aspiration of the orbit and ocular adnexa.: A retrospective study of 59 cases
    Fonseca, RR
    Cabral, J
    Mendonça, E
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2005, 85 : 65A - 65A
  • [40] Clinicopathological features of 30 patients with primary lymphoid tumors in the ocular-adnexa
    Pérez-Encinas, M
    Alonso, N
    Rodríguez, M
    Rodríguez, R
    Díaz, J
    Rabuñal, J
    Bendaña, A
    González, S
    Abuín, I
    Prada, C
    Pérez, J
    Bello, JL
    7TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE EUROPEAN HAEMATOLOGY ASSOCIATION, 2002, : 223 - 227