Hydrogen delivery scenario analysis model for hydrogen distribution options

被引:0
|
作者
Mintz, Marianne
Gillette, Jerry
Elgowainy, Amgad
Paster, Mark
Ringer, Matthew
Brown, Daryl
Li, James
机构
[1] Argonne Natl Lab, Argonne, IL 60439 USA
[2] Tennessee State Univ, Dept Mech & Mfg Engn, Nashville, TN 37209 USA
[3] US DOE, Off Hydrogen Fuel Cells & Infrastruct Technologie, Washington, DC 20585 USA
[4] Natl Renewable Energy Lab, Browns Mills, NJ USA
[5] Pacific NW Natl Lab, Richland, WA 99354 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
As with the distribution of any commodity, distribution of hydrogen depends on how the hydrogen is packaged, how far it must travel, and how much must be delivered. Few would argue that transporting a high-pressure gas is markedly different from transporting a cryogenic liquid-or even a liquid at standard temperature and pressure. Packaging affects not only density (weight/volume) but also the operation of potential delivery modes and onboard storage, a problem that has been called the grand challenge of the hydrogen economy. These three factors-packaging (which in turn affects shipment size and modal attributes), delivery distance, and demand-affect both the structure of potential delivery systems and their contribution to unit costs. This paper describes the hydrogen delivery scenario analysis model, a generalized model of hydrogen delivery that can be used to analyze the economic feasibility of various options for hydrogen distribution to markets of different sizes and types. Inputs may be user defined, or default values developed for the U.S. Department of Energy's Hydrogen Analysis project may be used. This paper describes the model's structure and capabilities, presents initial results, and discusses ongoing enhancements.
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 120
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] What are the options for hydrogen plant revamps?
    Dybkjær, I
    HYDROCARBON PROCESSING, 2005, 84 (02): : 63 - +
  • [32] Smart energy solutions with hydrogen options
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    Acar, Canan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2018, 43 (18) : 8579 - 8599
  • [33] An options approach to investment in a hydrogen infrastructure
    van Benthem, A. A.
    Kramer, G. J.
    Ramer, R.
    ENERGY POLICY, 2006, 34 (17) : 2949 - 2963
  • [34] Validation of a FLUENT CFD model for hydrogen distribution in a containment
    Visser, D. C.
    Houkema, M.
    Siccama, N. B.
    Komen, E. M. J.
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2012, 245 : 161 - 171
  • [35] Model Supported Business Case Scenario Analysis for Decentral Hydrogen Conversion, Storage and Consumption within Energy Hubs
    van Leeuwen, Richard P.
    Boerman, Annelies E.
    Schaefer, Edmund W.
    Hoogsteen, Gerwin
    Hajimolana, Yashar S.
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (06)
  • [36] Photovoltaics and hydrogen: Future energy options
    Lodhi, MAK
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 1997, 38 (18) : 1881 - 1893
  • [37] Hydrogen Refueling Stations and Carbon Emission Reduction of Coastal Expressways: A Deployment Model and Multi-Scenario Analysis
    Wang, Zhe
    Wang, Dongxing
    Zhao, Fan
    Han, Fenghui
    Ji, Yulong
    Cai, Wenjian
    JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 10 (07)
  • [38] Hydrogen microscopy - Distribution of hydrogen in buckled niobium hydrogen thin films
    Wagner, Stefan
    Moser, Marcus
    Greubel, Christoph
    Peeper, Katrin
    Reichart, Patrick
    Pundt, Astrid
    Dollinger, Guenther
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2013, 38 (31) : 13822 - 13830
  • [39] A scenario analysis of investment options for the Cuban power sector using the MARKAL model
    Wright, Evelyn L.
    Belt, Juan A. B.
    Chambers, Adam
    Delaquil, Pat
    Goldstein, Gary
    ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (07) : 3342 - 3355
  • [40] A renewable energy and hydrogen scenario for northern Europe
    Sorensen, Bent
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2008, 32 (05) : 471 - 500