A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of provocative tests of the neck for diagnosing cervical radiculopathy

被引:148
|
作者
Rubinstein, Sidney M.
Pool, Jan J. M.
van Tulder, Maurits W.
Riphagen, Ingrid I.
de Vet, Henrica C. W.
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Inst Res Extramural Med EMGO, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Fac Earth & Life Sci, Inst Hlth Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Library, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
sensitivity; specificity; diagnostic accuracy; systematic review; cervical radiculopathy; upper limb tension test; Spurling's test; shoulder abduction test;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-006-0225-6
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Clinical provocative tests of the neck, which position the neck and arm inorder to aggravate or relieve arm symptoms, are commonly used in clinical practice in patients with a suspected cervical radiculopathy. Their diagnostic accuracy, however, has never been examined in a systematic review. A comprehensive search was conducted in order to identify all possible studies fulfilling the inclusion criteria. A study was included if: (1) any provocative test of the neck for diagnosing cervical radiculopathy was identified; (2) any reference standard was used; (3) sensitivity and specificity were reported or could be (re-)calculated; and, (4) the publication was a full report. Two reviewers independently selected studies, and assessed methodological quality. Only six studies met the inclusion criteria, which evaluated five provocative tests. In general, Spurling's test demonstrated low to moderate sensitivity and high specificity, as did traction/neck distraction, and Valsalva's maneuver. The upper limb tension test (ULTT) demonstrated high sensitivity and low specificity, while the shoulder abduction test demonstrated low to moderate sensitivity and moderate to high specificity. Common methodological flaws included lack of an optimal reference standard, disease progression bias, spectrum bias, and review bias. Limitations include few primary studies, substantial heterogeneity, and numerous methodological flaws among the studies; therefore, a meta-analysis was not conducted. This review suggests that, when consistent with the history and other physical findings, a positive Spurling's, traction/neck distraction, and Valsalva's might be indicative of a cervical radiculopathy, while a negative ULTT might be used to rule it out. However, the lack of evidence precludes any firm conclusions regarding their diagnostic value, especially when used in primary care. More high quality studies are necessary in order to resolve this issue.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 319
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Accuracy a diagnostic tests read with and without clinical information - A systematic review
    Loy, CT
    Irwig, L
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (13): : 1602 - 1609
  • [42] Diagnostic accuracy of tests for leprosy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gurung, P.
    Gomes, C. M.
    Vernal, S.
    Leeflang, M. M. G.
    [J]. CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2019, 25 (11) : 1315 - 1327
  • [43] Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis - A systematic review of the accuracy of diagnostic tests
    de Graaf, I
    Prak, A
    Bierma-Zeinstra, S
    Thomas, S
    Peul, W
    Koes, B
    [J]. SPINE, 2006, 31 (10) : 1168 - 1176
  • [44] Diagnostic Accuracy of Tuning Fork Tests for Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review
    Kelly, Elizabeth A.
    Li, Bin
    Adams, Meredith E.
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2018, 159 (02) : 220 - 230
  • [45] Diagnostic accuracy of the upper limb neurodynamic test with median bias (ULNT1) for cervical radiculopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shen, Peng
    Tsang, Raymond Chi-Chung
    Liang, Ying
    Chen, Xiwen
    [J]. PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2023, 120 : 17 - 25
  • [46] Accuracy of FENO for diagnosing asthma: a systematic review
    Karrasch, Stefan
    Linde, Klaus
    Ruecker, Gerta
    Sommer, Harriet
    Karsch-Voelk, Marlies
    Kleijnen, Jos
    Joerres, Rudolf A.
    Schneider, Antonius
    [J]. THORAX, 2017, 72 (02) : 109 - 116
  • [47] The diagnostic accuracy of serum microRNAs in detection of cervical cancer: a systematic review protocol
    Ssedyabane, Frank
    Niyonzima, Nixon
    Ngonzi, Joseph
    Tusubira, Deusdedit
    Ocan, Moses
    Akena, Dickens
    Namisango, Eve
    Apunyo, Robert
    Kinengyere, Alison Annet
    Obuku, Ekwaro A.
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC AND PROGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2023, 7 (01)
  • [48] Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests of the hip: a systematic review with meta-analysis
    Reiman, Michael P.
    Goode, Adam P.
    Hegedus, Eric J.
    Cook, Chad E.
    Wright, Alexis A.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2013, 47 (14) : 893 - 902
  • [49] Diagnosis of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis An Updated Systematic Review of the Accuracy of Diagnostic Tests
    de Schepper, Evelien I. T.
    Overdevest, Gijsbert M.
    Suri, Pradeep
    Peul, Wilco C.
    Oei, Edwin H. G.
    Koes, Bart W.
    Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita M. A.
    Luijsterburg, Pim A. J.
    [J]. SPINE, 2013, 38 (08) : E469 - E481
  • [50] Diagnostic accuracy of scapular physical examination tests for shoulder disorders: a systematic review
    Wright, Alexis A.
    Wassinger, Craig A.
    Frank, Mason
    Michener, Lori A.
    Hegedus, Eric J.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2013, 47 (14) : 886 - 892