A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of provocative tests of the neck for diagnosing cervical radiculopathy

被引:148
|
作者
Rubinstein, Sidney M.
Pool, Jan J. M.
van Tulder, Maurits W.
Riphagen, Ingrid I.
de Vet, Henrica C. W.
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Inst Res Extramural Med EMGO, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Fac Earth & Life Sci, Inst Hlth Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Library, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
sensitivity; specificity; diagnostic accuracy; systematic review; cervical radiculopathy; upper limb tension test; Spurling's test; shoulder abduction test;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-006-0225-6
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Clinical provocative tests of the neck, which position the neck and arm inorder to aggravate or relieve arm symptoms, are commonly used in clinical practice in patients with a suspected cervical radiculopathy. Their diagnostic accuracy, however, has never been examined in a systematic review. A comprehensive search was conducted in order to identify all possible studies fulfilling the inclusion criteria. A study was included if: (1) any provocative test of the neck for diagnosing cervical radiculopathy was identified; (2) any reference standard was used; (3) sensitivity and specificity were reported or could be (re-)calculated; and, (4) the publication was a full report. Two reviewers independently selected studies, and assessed methodological quality. Only six studies met the inclusion criteria, which evaluated five provocative tests. In general, Spurling's test demonstrated low to moderate sensitivity and high specificity, as did traction/neck distraction, and Valsalva's maneuver. The upper limb tension test (ULTT) demonstrated high sensitivity and low specificity, while the shoulder abduction test demonstrated low to moderate sensitivity and moderate to high specificity. Common methodological flaws included lack of an optimal reference standard, disease progression bias, spectrum bias, and review bias. Limitations include few primary studies, substantial heterogeneity, and numerous methodological flaws among the studies; therefore, a meta-analysis was not conducted. This review suggests that, when consistent with the history and other physical findings, a positive Spurling's, traction/neck distraction, and Valsalva's might be indicative of a cervical radiculopathy, while a negative ULTT might be used to rule it out. However, the lack of evidence precludes any firm conclusions regarding their diagnostic value, especially when used in primary care. More high quality studies are necessary in order to resolve this issue.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 319
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of provocative tests of the neck for diagnosing cervical radiculopathy
    Sidney M. Rubinstein
    Jan J. M. Pool
    Maurits W. van Tulder
    Ingrid I. Riphagen
    Henrica C. W. de Vet
    [J]. European Spine Journal, 2007, 16 : 307 - 319
  • [2] Value of physical tests in diagnosing cervical radiculopathy: a systematic review
    Thoomes, Erik J.
    van Geest, Sarita
    van der Windt, Danielle A.
    Falla, Deborah
    Verhagen, Arianne P.
    Koes, Bart W.
    Thoomes-de Graaf, Marloes
    Kuijper, Barbara
    Scholten-Peeters, Wendy G. M.
    Vleggeert-Lankamp, Carmen L.
    [J]. SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 18 (01): : 179 - 189
  • [3] Provocative Diagnostic Testing for Cervical Radiculopathy
    Over, Darrell R.
    [J]. AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2010, 82 (09) : 1051 - 1051
  • [4] The value of provocative tests in diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy
    Ghasemi, Majid
    Golabchi, Khodayar
    Mousavi, Seyed Ali
    Asadi, Bahador
    Rezvani, Majid
    Shaygannejad, Vahid
    Salari, Mehri
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2013, 18 : S35 - S38
  • [5] Diagnostic Test Accuracy of Genetic Tests in Diagnosing Psoriasis: A Systematic Review
    Mirghani, Hyder
    Alharfy, Abdulrahman Arshed N.
    Alanazi, Abeer Mohammed M.
    Aljohani, Jomanah Khalid M.
    Aljohani, Raghad Abdulrahman A.
    Albalawi, Raghad Hamdan A.
    Aljohani, Raneem Abdulrahman A.
    Albalawi, Danah Mohsen Alqasmi
    Albalawi, Rahaf Hamdan A.
    Mostafa, Mohamed, I
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (11)
  • [6] Diagnostic accuracy of patient interview items and clinical tests for cervical radiculopathy
    Sleijser-Koehorsta, Marije L. S.
    Coppieters, Michel W.
    Epping, Rob
    Rooker, Servan
    Verhagen, Arianne P.
    Scholten-Peeters, Gwendolyne G. M.
    [J]. PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2021, 111 : 74 - 82
  • [7] Diagnostic accuracy of upper limb neurodynamic tests in the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy
    Grondin, Francis
    Cook, Chad
    Hall, Toby
    Maillard, Olivier
    Perdrix, Yannick
    Freppel, Sebastien
    [J]. MUSCULOSKELETAL SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2021, 55
  • [8] Diagnostic Accuracy of Upper Cervical Spine Instability Tests: A Systematic Review
    Hutting, Nathan
    Scholten-Peeters, Gwendolijne G. M.
    Vijverman, Veerle
    Keesenberg, Martin D. M.
    Verhagen, Arianne P.
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2013, 93 (12): : 1686 - 1695
  • [9] Diagnostic Accuracy of the Neck Tornado Test as a New Screening Test in Cervical Radiculopathy
    Park, Juyeon
    Park, Woo Young
    Hong, Seungbae
    An, Jiwon
    Koh, Jae Chul
    Lee, Youn-Woo
    Kim, Yong Chan
    Choi, Jong Bum
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 14 (07): : 662 - 667
  • [10] Diagnostic Accuracy of Point of Care Tests for Diagnosing Celiac Disease A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Singh, Prashant
    Arora, Ananya
    Strand, Tor A.
    Leffler, Daniel A.
    Maki, Markku
    Kelly, Ciaran P.
    Ahuja, Vineet
    Makharia, Govind K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 53 (07) : 535 - 542